HOME | DD

Panamatt [2006-11-26 05:13:38 +0000 UTC]

Ok...um...wow? This is an extremely creative presentation in my opinion (you had me wondering there for a little bit). I actually needed your reassurance in document 3 to know for sure.

I was also impressed with your knowledge of terms (I'm looking at "Trilobal with CW Twist" thinking 'wah?'). My guess is that you are either a genius of biological science or you did some internet searches to find out what you needed. No matter what the case may be, it shows to me a dedication to accuracy that is great to see.

This looks like fun! I look forward to reading what you write about this. Keep em coming.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

felineflames [2006-11-25 15:32:34 +0000 UTC]

It really looks like you've done your homework for all these! Kudos to you for the Diapsid category and all. It makes my (not so) inner biology nerd squee with glee.

Alas, I must make a suggestion to make this look even more accurate: You've labled the genus of this species as Homo. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, you can't have organisms of different orders with the same genus name. :-\ This is because most species aren't listed with the rest of their taxonomic name, just the genus and species name. I'd suggest making the name Homodraconis or something equivocal. ^_^ Also, the species name is always supposed to be lower case. So, Homo sapiens instead of Homo Sapiens.

These are looking totally awesome. You almost had me for a couple seconds. ^__^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nargus [2006-11-25 02:59:18 +0000 UTC]

darn That's good idea you got there You almost got me in the first document

Can I volunteer to be a test subject anyway?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1