HOME | DD

DragonLoreStudios — Human to Dragon Leg Anatomy Tutorial by-nc-nd

Published: 2016-01-26 22:14:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 10327; Favourites: 168; Downloads: 64
Redirect to original
Description I decided I should go ahead and do the dragon Anatomy Tutorial Series starting with the legs! so um..hope its helpful i showed the difference between a human leg and arm and a dragons back and front leg~ I am not a anatomy expert but it should be accurate enough to get a good idea how the muscle structure of a Dragon's leg functions! The hind legs could of been a bit more muscular but for space saving i make them a bit slimmer.
Related content
Comments: 13

WingedWilly [2016-01-29 21:30:01 +0000 UTC]

I'd rather draw dragons my way then like that.
 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonLoreStudios In reply to WingedWilly [2016-01-30 02:25:35 +0000 UTC]

I was just stating various things that can be used as a guideline to better bring out the detail of your design >.> your front legs need knees <.< thats my biggest gripe. You don't even have a knee join in your contruction lines. straight leg or not you still need to indicate there's a knee joint.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

calamitasCorvus In reply to DragonLoreStudios [2016-04-09 01:04:07 +0000 UTC]

i checked his gallery out of curiosity and even checked his old art. I'm unsure of what you mean by "front legs need knees"
Front legs don't have knees. Sure, the forearm is too short, but the elbow is still there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonLoreStudios In reply to calamitasCorvus [2016-04-09 11:40:39 +0000 UTC]

My grammar and knowledge of English is poor cause of disabilities sorry. And I guess I used knees cause the front leg of a dragon would have a knee considering the wing is arm anatomy wise more then a legs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

calamitasCorvus In reply to DragonLoreStudios [2016-04-09 20:10:05 +0000 UTC]

Yes, wings have the same anatomy as arms, but you were talking about front legs, not wings. 
He's not really missing anything in how the legs were drawn, the proportions were just bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonLoreStudios In reply to calamitasCorvus [2016-04-11 00:36:49 +0000 UTC]

That's fine he's the one who asked for critique on the images not the other way around not my fault he didn't like it and decided to flame my page instead.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

WingedWilly In reply to DragonLoreStudios [2016-01-31 09:26:40 +0000 UTC]

hey you can also critique my oldest pictures, why would you stop in just middle of my gallery line?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonLoreStudios In reply to WingedWilly [2016-01-31 18:31:02 +0000 UTC]

I just havn't gotten around to looking at more of your stuff ^-^ being the founder of this Studio and the only artist for the project keeps me busy. Plus i do all my weekly and monthly content for the community. It piles up easily. anyways I'll look and give feedback or other artwork when i have the moment to do so ^-^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WingedWilly In reply to DragonLoreStudios [2016-02-01 16:53:00 +0000 UTC]

I mean two years deviation need no critique.
critique after two years is not constructive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonLoreStudios In reply to WingedWilly [2016-02-01 20:57:18 +0000 UTC]

two years old or not people still look it today. It was the first time I saw it. regardless of it being 2 years old.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WingedWilly In reply to DragonLoreStudios [2016-02-02 18:54:29 +0000 UTC]

yeah well, you can go critique caveman drawings as well, 
perphaps people still look it today. :\

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonLoreStudios In reply to WingedWilly [2016-02-03 02:48:15 +0000 UTC]

yes you could and if i could critique a caveman drawing I would treat it accordingly for it's age of art.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

WingedWilly In reply to DragonLoreStudios [2016-02-03 15:18:18 +0000 UTC]

whatever

👍: 0 ⏩: 0