HOME | DD

dyanbc — Cross

Published: 2011-05-01 20:20:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 147; Favourites: 7; Downloads: 9
Redirect to original
Description my first attempt at macro photography with my 18-55mm kit lens. taken in natural light on our sofa (the fibers!)
i used the poor man's macro lens or the reverse lens technique and focused on my rosary ring (today's the beatification of Pope John Paul II, i thought it fitting)
basic tweaking of levels and curves on PS
i used my camera's Live View function, timer and L O T S of P A T I E N C E!


related posts:
green and gold
odd stack
Related content
Comments: 8

josephacheng [2011-05-02 10:30:44 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, looks hard due to the low light. It also gets confusing because you can't control the aperture of the lens...

The only reason why I don't recommend the technique is due to dust. Awesome photo nonetheless!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dyanbc In reply to josephacheng [2011-05-03 20:12:49 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

yeah..i'm worried about dust entering the camera body and settling on the image sensor
but i won't mind damaging the kit lens... it was pretty much collecting dust in my cabinet anyway. talagang inaapi ang kit lens haha!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

josephacheng In reply to dyanbc [2011-05-04 10:28:58 +0000 UTC]

Well, it is a standard kit lens.
Generally, people don't use them. They but it and keep it as a back-up lens, then buy a real kit lens... like those 24-70mm F/2.8 primes or an 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 which have more range.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dyanbc In reply to josephacheng [2011-05-04 16:32:28 +0000 UTC]

i know...
ahhhh, i can't afford the canon 24-70mm. i'm looking for a great third party lens alternative @ f/2.8 or something similar.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

josephacheng In reply to dyanbc [2011-05-05 11:15:40 +0000 UTC]

I actually prefer more range than a F/2.8 kit lens; they're not only cheaper but usually offer sharper images. The only time you're really supposed to use F/2.8 is on low lighting... and if you want subject isolation, you're either supposed to use a long focal length or much wider aperture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

woofwoof1996 [2011-05-01 20:30:47 +0000 UTC]

Awwww very pretty !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dyanbc In reply to woofwoof1996 [2011-05-01 20:38:08 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much! appreciate it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

woofwoof1996 In reply to dyanbc [2011-05-01 21:14:56 +0000 UTC]

Ur welcome !!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0