HOME | DD
Elmic-Toboo — Billy Dee Two-Face
Published: 2012-07-29 06:17:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 9786; Favourites: 59; Downloads: 129
Redirect to original
Description
If Batman Forever was a Tim Burton Film! (Did this manip of Billy Dee Williams into Two-Face in about an hour using Gimp!)Related content
Comments: 36
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I wish. Do you think those movies would have made more sense to have had at least someone of the same ethnicity playing Two-Face in the third one?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
At least there be a villain who is African-American. There's not a lot of them in the dc comic world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tim Burton hadn't intended on using Two-Face in his third Batman film, although he had left the door open as a possibility of Billy Dee Williams returning and becoming Two-Face in a future installment. Tim Burton reportedly wanted to make a Hallowe'en Batman film with Brad Dourif as the Scarecrow. www.theguardian.com/film/2013/…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You might be right if Billy Dee Williams did Two-face and Robin Williams did Riddler. It'd probably would've been better. And if it was by Tim Burton, it would've been a lot better.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SUPERB!
I have made a few Returns figures and plan on making Two face Bill-Dee to fit in - I love the design you have here, I was thinking along the same lines - a kind of grey white to contrast against his skin! I will save this pic as reference
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hah, cool 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ahh what could have been if Mr. Williams had his way. Nice work Elmic-Toboo
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Why thank you, and thanks for the fave too
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Question what font did you use for the text?
Please reply cause i been looking for that font for awhile!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh it's called Danmark URW Bold 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No offence but Burton had little interest in the character and had no intentions of using him. He wasn't even going to appear in Forever had Burton made it. Burton reportedly had no fully-fledged plans for his so called Batman III and I'm sure I would have heard of it before now if it were true.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"No offense but"? Seriously? That's just a piss-weak excuse to try and actually offend someone!
Anyway, your point being? This is just how I pictured it, okay! Calm yo Farm! I'm just having fun!
btw, "Burton reportedly had no fully-fledged plans for his so called Batman III" so what, he didn't have any "fully-fledged plans" because when he went in to see if he were going to make another movie the guys at Warner Brothers told him to piss off! They said, wouldn't you like to do a smaller film now? And Burton was all like, you don't want me to do another one, do you! And that clearly offended him a bit so he basically told them to get screwed! Anyway that's just how I understand the situation
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Um, i was just trying to explain it without offending you in some way.
From everything I have ever read and even the interviews with the crew members, etc, Burton had nothing to do with BF. Correct me if I am wrong, but Burton did not enter any kind of production on BF. He says on the DVD that directly after BR came out, he stepped down and was not asked to helm the third. He had some involvement (although likely very very little), because he's credited as a Producer on Batman Forever. He had some meeting with Schumacher and the Batchlers, like giving them a blessing to go on and do their thing (as they tell it). But after his first meeting with Warner execs post-Returns, about the potential for a third film, they basically pushed him out, and he went on to his next project apparently without much objection.
Burton claims the producer credit was a contractual obligation rather than a representation of his creative input. He says he contributed absolutely nothing to Batman Forever. Schumacher claiming otherwise was just to keep the Burton fans on-board.
Burton also said that he had no full fledged plans for his so called Batman 3. The so-called Burton scripts, storyboards, etc are pure fan fiction.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thats true, he had little to do with Batman forever, and "Batman III" is just a rumor, but he had wanted Robin Williams to play the riddler if he ever used it, and had ideas about how he would do said character (riddlers hair would be shaved in the shape of a question mark), and he had planned to use two-face eventually (Just not in III), and I heard somewhere that two-face's face would be charred. SO, this persons rendition of a burton two-face is the best I've seen, as the rest are just giving Billy-Dee Williams the Tommy-Lee Jones purple face.
So yeah.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
What is known for sure is that Joel Schumacher definitely, definitely went to Robin Williams first, not Tim Burton. Schumacher says Robin Williams kept saying yes, then no, then yes again, and finally turned it down. Robin Williams was still upset about how Warner Bros. had treated him over the Joker casting (as bait to bring in Jack Nicholson). Only then was Jim Carrey bought, and the rest is history.
"I asked Robin," bemoans Schumacher. "I spent a year trying to talk Robin into it. He said, 'I'm going to do it Joel, I'm going to do it, but I just can't say yes today.' It's like asking someone to marry you; when they don't say yes, you start looking around. I don't quite know what Robin's hesitations were. Maybe it was me, maybe it was the part. I immediately thought of Jim, and the minute he walked through the door he looked exactly like The Riddler in the comic books - pencil thin. It's almost like Plastic Man, in a way. You know, he has no stunt person in the movie? All the stuff with the cane, all that stuff is him."
As for Burton so called Two-Face, he had the chance to add Harvey Dent to Batman Returns but decided skip him and not make any reference to his existence on it because from what i understood Burton's his only interest was Catwoman and that was it. Penguin was something that Burton didn't want to use but it was forced on him by WB.
👍: 1 ⏩: 3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0