HOME | DD

emilyaddisonScorch [NSFW]

Published: 2011-02-20 05:21:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 67645; Favourites: 1416; Downloads: 1817
Redirect to original
Description Photographer: GW Burns

Location: Costa Rica

I am posing on a giant formation of volcanic rock
Related content
Comments: 318

Zach3893 In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 05:44:24 +0000 UTC]

How much time did you just waste writing that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Typhloser In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 05:47:34 +0000 UTC]

Not much. At least you didn't copy/paste it. But still, I think on the whole 'she looks like she has a male jaw', it's due to the shading in that area. Lighten up. No human body is perfect.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to Typhloser [2011-12-07 05:51:29 +0000 UTC]

I said my opinion and everyone jumped on me for it.... last time I do that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Typhloser In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 11:05:24 +0000 UTC]

If you wouldn't copy-paste your replies...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to Typhloser [2011-12-07 19:50:08 +0000 UTC]

Why would I waste my time writing unique replies to the same messages of middle-aged men being butt-hurt that they just fapped to dude?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Typhloser In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 20:16:56 +0000 UTC]

If you weren't retarded, you'd see that some of them are women or young guys who know what they're talking about. The model looks female to me, I should know, 'cause I'm female and have medical books with pictures on female anatomy. And I read the book often. And if you would look at their replies, they're not saying the same thing word-for-word. At least you could do the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to Typhloser [2011-12-07 20:46:26 +0000 UTC]

Don't care..... go harass someone else.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Typhloser In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 21:41:54 +0000 UTC]

If only what I was doing was called harassment. But, alas, it is not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to Typhloser [2011-12-07 21:47:24 +0000 UTC]

Harass (verb) - to disturb persistently; torment, as with troubles or cares; bother continually; pester; persecute.

Yes you are, and I will kindly ask you to stop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Typhloser In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 22:33:43 +0000 UTC]

I'm not doing any of those things. I'm simply having a conversation with you. We are at a disagreement, no namecalling is being done, and no flaming is happening.

To break it down,
You disturbed the artist first,
I'm not tormenting you,
You're the one who keeps replying that you want to be left alone, yet you can just stop replying altogether,
Again, I'm not pestering, as you started the conversation string and continue to reply to me,
I haven't called or accused you of anything other than what is true, that you're copy-pasting the same reply to anyone that makes a tl;dr message about how they disagree with your critique.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to Typhloser [2011-12-07 22:37:01 +0000 UTC]

reported... thanks for replying

👍: 0 ⏩: 9

CCarnelian666 In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-08 03:59:11 +0000 UTC]

Uttering the word "Reported" publicly is now considered harassment by dA's admins, and is a bannable offense.
The more times you see it, the better. c:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thorn21 In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-08 01:31:06 +0000 UTC]

Report's gonna come back negative...thanks for playing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShadowMaker-241 In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-08 00:50:32 +0000 UTC]

Public reporting counts as harassment and can get you in trouble now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zetsu-0-Sakura In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 23:59:54 +0000 UTC]

And watch that report of yours become invalid, Zach.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MilukiSama In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 23:49:52 +0000 UTC]

Saying reported gets you in trouble not her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BomKosh In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 23:17:01 +0000 UTC]

> Tells user that she's harassing you.
> Tells her in public that she has been reported.
> deviantART considers telling users that they're reported in public is considered harassment.

Hypocrite, much?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Accelgors In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 23:02:07 +0000 UTC]

There's no reportable offense here, dipshit

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

h-irsch In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 22:48:57 +0000 UTC]


Saying to publicly report someone is considered harassment on DA and can get you banned. Good luck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Typhloser In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 22:39:16 +0000 UTC]

Saying that you've reported me is harassment! Did you know that? So I should be the one filing a report!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShugarSketch In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 04:13:02 +0000 UTC]

Dissproportionate breasts? Oddly shaped vagina? Those comments seem to me more a matter of opinion than fact.
Also how does this picture even look like it's trying to hide these features, when they are all in plain sight?

There isn't one shape for breasts and vaginas.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to ShugarSketch [2011-12-07 04:16:14 +0000 UTC]

Exactly..... opinion............. why are you wasting your time restating my message then adding nonsense that I don't care about? I have my opinion so please go call your best bud up and complain to him instead of me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShugarSketch In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 04:18:33 +0000 UTC]

It seems you read my comment w/o reading my comment. I stated why I thought so and I will leave it at that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to ShugarSketch [2011-12-07 04:22:55 +0000 UTC]

What are you 10 years-old? Go to tell your dad to turn the mature content block back on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShugarSketch In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 04:56:58 +0000 UTC]

It seems you read my comment w/o reading my comment. I stated why I thought so and I will leave it at that.

Because that honestly had no relevence to anything I said, lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Twistedsnail In reply to ShugarSketch [2011-12-07 05:42:24 +0000 UTC]

win

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Battledress In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 02:47:07 +0000 UTC]

You have a very narrow view point of what it takes to look feminine....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to Battledress [2011-12-07 04:01:50 +0000 UTC]

It seems you read my comment w/o reading my comment. I stated why I thought so and I will leave it at that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Battledress In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 04:56:11 +0000 UTC]

Nope.
I can read.
You're postulating that the model looks post-op transgender.

My comment stands. You have a very narrow view of what it takes to look feminine.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

junoXinu In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 02:32:46 +0000 UTC]

I personally don't think she looks like a man, but to me it looks like her left breast implant is sagging in an odd way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vellosia In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 02:22:29 +0000 UTC]

You haven't seen many women, have you? I prefer them not to look like those malnourished models in magazines

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to Vellosia [2011-12-07 04:01:37 +0000 UTC]

It seems you read my comment w/o reading my comment. I stated why I thought so and I will leave it at that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vellosia In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 04:11:09 +0000 UTC]

No, I read your comment. Twice, before I added my thoughts. If you expect all attractive women to look like Megan Fox, you are in for a lonely life.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to Vellosia [2011-12-07 04:14:22 +0000 UTC]

If you expect everyone to share your point of view of what an attractive woman looks like, then you are in for a lonely life. I pointed out many aspects that are tell-tale signs of a post surgery sex-change. I even claimed that I was probably wrong. I don't know what you are trying to accomplish, but you are trying to hard.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vellosia In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 04:22:52 +0000 UTC]

I'm a girl, I can tell when a woman is a woman. Besides the breasts, she looks pretty natural to me.
Plus, mens' bone structure is broader than that, and sex changes can't hide that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

YannickBouchard In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 01:27:03 +0000 UTC]

What!?
Man, if she looks like a dude to you...

...well at least you should take a look at the rest of her gallery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zach3893 In reply to YannickBouchard [2011-12-07 01:37:21 +0000 UTC]

It seems you read my comment w/o reading my comment. I stated why I thought so and I will leave it at that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YannickBouchard In reply to Zach3893 [2011-12-07 11:54:41 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I read your comment correctly. I just think it was useless and rude for you to make such a comment about someone's physical appearance on their message board. I'm not saying you have no right to your opinion, just that you easily could have not made the comment at all and kept it to yourself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sp1ck In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 01:06:00 +0000 UTC]

tits vagina

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

falloutloveandhim In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 01:04:51 +0000 UTC]

Nice shot, but pretty boring for a DD. Sorry!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nyx-Valentine In reply to falloutloveandhim [2011-12-07 01:32:24 +0000 UTC]

I wasn't aware that DDs had to fit into a specific definition of "exciting." But feel free to suggest something you find more interesting any time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rouge12345 In reply to ??? [2011-12-07 00:11:30 +0000 UTC]

no me gusto, porque siempre ponen chicas desnudas, si ha eso llaman sexy se equivocan, porque una mujer se ve sexy cuando esta VESTIDA!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RyukaField In reply to rouge12345 [2011-12-07 00:56:19 +0000 UTC]

Tambien hay qe saber diferenciar entre lo que es artistico y lo que es usado para el morbo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

rouge12345 In reply to RyukaField [2011-12-11 20:11:33 +0000 UTC]

si tenes razon perdon por el anterior comentario

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

daikkenaurora In reply to ??? [2011-12-06 23:53:48 +0000 UTC]

Its my dream woman.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JEFFTHEFingBROOM In reply to ??? [2011-12-06 23:17:54 +0000 UTC]

WOOOOWWWWWW

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sockhiddenunderarook In reply to ??? [2011-12-06 22:48:22 +0000 UTC]

Nice shot. That there are about 100 other of.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

junoXinu In reply to sockhiddenunderarook [2011-12-07 00:38:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KillboxGraphics In reply to sockhiddenunderarook [2011-12-07 00:33:36 +0000 UTC]

Lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AstralKiwi In reply to ??? [2011-12-06 22:40:50 +0000 UTC]

Okay, I'm actually going to comment on a controversial 'artistic nude' photograph for once. First off, I have absolutely no problem with nude art, I think some of it is truly stunning and have many in my favourites. I do not believe that the body is something to be hidden away; however, I also don't think it by itself is art. It is the vision and manipulation of the body that makes a piece of art.

So this is the problem I have with this as a Daily Deviation.
The photo itself is of course fine to upload to dA, it's a nice shot and the model is seemingly brave.
But a DD? Looking at the quality of the photograph, her face is not captured sharply at all and many features are actually a bit blurred. The lighting of the photo doesn't seem to work either, it doesn't do much for the eyes. Saying that, I do like the bold red lines, and I think the idea could have been better executed.
And what is the message of this 'art', really? "Look, I have tits and a vagina!"? So do I, that's nothing special. Sure, your womanly parts are attractive, but how is that art? That's like me saying "Wow, my hair looks really shiny today through no doings of my own. I'll take a photo and it'll be art because someone somewhere will think my hair's pretty!" Art should have thought, effort and meaning put into it. Sure, photographs can capture lucky moments - that's what they're meant to do, capture memories, not produce masterpieces - but some talented people can arrange a setting for a photograph to make it magnificent and thoughtful. That's art.

These are of course my own thoughts, everyone considers different things art. I just often hear people slagging off art because they think 'modern art' is rubbish, and it makes me question what art really is. While this particular piece can be considered art, it is my personal opinion that the praise it is receiving by many viewers is careless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 5


| Next =>