HOME | DD

explosivecookie β€” Thomas the Tank Engine, 1920 - 1960 V2

#thomasandfriends #steamengine #steamlocomotive #steamtrain #train #thomasthetankengine #awdry #railwayseries #thomasthetankengineandfriends
Published: 2016-10-15 18:12:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 19638; Favourites: 142; Downloads: 56
Redirect to original
Description Completely new updated mesh, built from scratch using the REAL E2 plans from the 7th of November 1914.
Really happy with how this render turned out, been testing out cycles in Blender.

UPDATE 23/10/16:
Face made by the wonderful and modified by myself.
Related content
Comments: 56

SudrianRailwayStudio [2018-07-22 21:50:36 +0000 UTC]

Excellent Work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

railfanner47 [2018-03-23 19:27:36 +0000 UTC]

At the time, I had no idea this was available in T:ANE. I just saw this on deviant art one day and thought: "Huh. Nice render " XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MatthewBoucher [2018-01-10 21:39:25 +0000 UTC]

The Front bogie in content manager says its faulty. How do I fix?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to MatthewBoucher [2018-01-14 10:11:41 +0000 UTC]

Could you tell me what it says is wrong?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MatthewBoucher In reply to explosivecookie [2018-01-15 07:18:03 +0000 UTC]

Fixed now

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tweetsie12 [2017-05-22 15:12:42 +0000 UTC]

INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

griffinr1945 [2017-02-14 04:02:25 +0000 UTC]

That is really good! Well done to both of you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonLeader1 [2016-12-09 02:41:25 +0000 UTC]

So you updated your own model?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to DragonLeader1 [2016-12-10 18:03:19 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I did. Wasn't happy with the original version.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonLeader1 In reply to explosivecookie [2016-12-10 23:01:02 +0000 UTC]

The original did look kinda good, but updating models is great!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

thegwpairie [2016-12-06 18:57:04 +0000 UTC]

were do I get this

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to thegwpairie [2016-12-06 20:56:10 +0000 UTC]

www.sodorworkshops.com - click on the Christmas stocking with "FF" on it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

thegwpairie In reply to explosivecookie [2016-12-21 16:53:41 +0000 UTC]

Thnx

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

steamtheboxtank [2016-11-19 13:25:54 +0000 UTC]

Wait the real E2 plans if you got a team up of people who want to make a new E2 (and make it operational)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to steamtheboxtank [2016-11-19 16:00:24 +0000 UTC]

Nah, I'll pass. An E2 wouldn't really warrant a new build project, only a handful of people would want to see a real E2 back - the rest would just want it for Thomas.
It'd cost more than it's worth...


the E2's are pretty inefficient locomotives anyway.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

EngineerRailMan In reply to explosivecookie [2017-01-03 20:57:18 +0000 UTC]

I'd say just make an E2X like Thomas. For starters, you can use a boiler of an E4X like LBSCR No. 104 in the 1950s. Then just straightened the running plate which will increase the water tanks and the Coal bunker and give it more weight for tractive effort. Then just add the wheel arches, and then you have the real Thomas. No need to add the Westinghouse Steam Pump.

The E2s originally had boilers of I2 locomotives. Which the I2s were failures as well, which I think that's how the E2s were considered failures.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to EngineerRailMan [2017-01-04 11:27:56 +0000 UTC]

I think that'd be the only feasible way to build one - but then what is it? An E2 improvement? Or just Thomas and only Thomas. That's the problem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

EngineerRailMan In reply to explosivecookie [2017-01-04 23:05:57 +0000 UTC]

It doesn't have to be a particular class. Some locomotives are just one offs.

Such as the Lickly Banker 'Big Emma', or the NVR No. 1800 'Thomas' etc.

We can just call it Thomas.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to EngineerRailMan [2017-01-04 23:49:05 +0000 UTC]

I think you mean "Big Bertha"!

But yeah - I just don't think people will come out to see a new build of "Thomas" basically.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

EngineerRailMan In reply to explosivecookie [2017-03-08 21:58:06 +0000 UTC]

Another thing too, Big Bertha has two different names. Β That's why I called her Big Emma

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EngineerRailMan In reply to explosivecookie [2017-01-05 02:08:50 +0000 UTC]

That's exactly what I mean!

I just thought of it for fans sake. Oh well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Iscreamer1 [2016-11-10 19:52:05 +0000 UTC]

So detailed...how he will look in a different color is questionable. You'll probably get a bit irritated at me for saying this but will there be an image like this showing Thomas in LBSC black or not?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to Iscreamer1 [2016-11-10 20:59:12 +0000 UTC]

No.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Iscreamer1 In reply to explosivecookie [2016-11-10 22:15:34 +0000 UTC]

Okay just wondering. I'll wait and see. By the way, have thought about achieving the rank of master builder?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to Iscreamer1 [2016-11-12 10:13:27 +0000 UTC]

What?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Iscreamer1 In reply to explosivecookie [2016-11-12 15:59:48 +0000 UTC]

Your models are improving so I guess that makes you a master builder (or modeller).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to Iscreamer1 [2016-11-12 16:31:59 +0000 UTC]

Riiiight - ok then.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheTankEngineCenter [2016-11-10 01:04:53 +0000 UTC]

Very good!
Do you think you will ever release it to the public?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to TheTankEngineCenter [2016-11-10 19:00:39 +0000 UTC]

Of course, I plan to release most of my models that are from the show or books.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MatthewBoucher In reply to explosivecookie [2017-11-03 23:42:15 +0000 UTC]

Where do you release them ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to MatthewBoucher [2017-11-04 21:19:54 +0000 UTC]

www.sodorworkshops.com

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mobian-Storyteller [2016-10-27 22:43:02 +0000 UTC]

Have i told you how amazing you are Luke?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ZheGermanFlo [2016-10-23 15:09:30 +0000 UTC]

Quite a outstanding piece of 3D modelling only thing that looks abit off are the crow feet on his face they look too big

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to ZheGermanFlo [2016-10-23 15:19:48 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I've removed em now. Will probably update the picture again later!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Curtis-Parish [2016-10-23 09:41:35 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Cotash14 [2016-10-23 00:15:23 +0000 UTC]

You my man, must work at ARC, this is AWSOME.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mondojawan [2016-10-22 23:51:34 +0000 UTC]

Is that the final face?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to mondojawan [2016-10-23 00:00:59 +0000 UTC]

Nah, will probably edit it a bit more. Just wanted an updated render sorted.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mondojawan In reply to explosivecookie [2016-10-23 00:09:13 +0000 UTC]

Ahhh cool

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Trainmaster12 [2016-10-18 00:18:59 +0000 UTC]

Not bad.

I've been meaning to ask this, but what kind of whistle sounds did you give Thomas and James?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to Trainmaster12 [2016-10-18 12:19:14 +0000 UTC]

Well, the whistles have both been changed now. They now have accurate whistles that belong to the nearest surviving class. For Thomas, he uses an LBSCR E4 whsitle and James uses an L&YR Class 27 whistle - closest whistles I can find that would be similar.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Trainmaster12 In reply to explosivecookie [2016-10-18 23:29:13 +0000 UTC]

I see.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gavino245 [2016-10-16 17:44:02 +0000 UTC]

i will bomb the ribble steam railway if you dont sned the cdp!!!!1

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to Gavino245 [2016-10-16 20:00:15 +0000 UTC]

Do it bitch.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Trainz605 [2016-10-16 06:25:47 +0000 UTC]

gweattt

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheHappyTruckShunter [2016-10-15 19:55:53 +0000 UTC]

veri secksy, look

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FfarquharEngine [2016-10-15 19:37:36 +0000 UTC]

bab this is noice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Steamking4468 [2016-10-15 19:15:21 +0000 UTC]

This is awesome work by the master.
Stunning Luke. Simply stunning.
Don't forget you'll need to teach me so I can do BG!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BenevolentJim [2016-10-15 18:51:54 +0000 UTC]

Looks brilliant! The improvements have made it look much better.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

explosivecookie In reply to BenevolentJim [2016-10-15 19:50:43 +0000 UTC]

Looks much better as it's a completely new model! Restarted it when I got the real plans.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>