HOME | DD
faezerII β i like red
#ehhe #lingerie #originalcharacter #hrnk #boysinlingerie
Published: 2017-06-23 23:42:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 1181; Favourites: 102; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
an indulgent thing i did a couple weeks back or something but didnt post..should this be labeled mature i'm not sure, i mean i don't rly think it is..
i wonder if anyone would be like..interested in lingerie adopts cuz like..i could do this all day LOl
Related content
Comments: 72
Holy....! Β This is amazing! Β Do you take commissions?
π: 0 β©: 1
i do! i need to update my commission page to include things like paintings, though. i can note you details if you're interested ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
I am I am! Β OMG, your art is gorgeous! Β
π: 0 β©: 0
hehe, thanks i'm glad to hear it ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
ehehe Lingerie Adopts ooooor please put my characters in lingerie. *nod nod*
π: 0 β©: 1
haH! well...commissions are open over here *wink wink*
π: 0 β©: 1
I will keep you in mind 
π: 0 β©: 0
when you're too much of a pussy cuck that you don't suit a man's clothing, so you need to reduce yourself to that of a woman's.
π: 0 β©: 1
so i know you're probably just trying to stir something up...but why is wearing women's clothing being "reduced"? and the idea of gendered clothing to begin with baffles me...it's just some pieces of cloth, man, why we gotta be like this. i'd love to be able to wear skirts and thigh-highs without it being some huge deal.Β
i can tell you'd have a reeaaallly fun time looking through my gallery, rip
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, pieces of cloth made in certain shapes to accentuate specific proportions. Something males and females have differences in. There's nothing wrong with gendered clothing at all. It makes perfect sense.Β
You WISH I cared enough to click through your gallery.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
i see what you're saying, but that's because the clothing is tailored that way. you could tailor a dress to accentuate a man's features as well. remember those old dresses with the giant shoulderpads? honestly i think that would look cool on a guy. i liked how it looked on women too though, haha. and lingerie for guys likely wouldn't have a focus on breasts or anything, but i don't see why lacy stuff can't be something for men. i mean, in the olden days men did wear lacy and frilly stuff, and even dresses! and it looked cool! and when heels were created, men were the first to wear them, if i recall correctly. and besides that, body types for men and women aren't so black and white. there are guys who have bigger hips than the women i know. some women have a very triangular body shape. by your logic, those women who don't fit a stereotypical feminine body shape shouldn't be wearing "women's clothes."Β
naah, that was sarcasm, trust me you don't ever want to set foot in there. it'd be a disappointment for both me and you.
π: 0 β©: 1
What do you mean by "dress" though? A typical wedding sort with the wide base, because that accentuates the wide hips in proportion to the smaller waist. Something men don't have. If it's a straight dress, those already kind of exist anyways, in the forms of robes.Β
Β
I've never heard of men wearing lace in this manner. Lace naturally has a flimsy and weak look, so to combine it with clothing traditionally female just looks befitting. Naturally, the majority of men who'd want anything to do with that would be submissive gays. As for the heels, they were much shorter and the shoe its self was a different shape. They were for horse riding.
"by your logic, those women who don't fit a stereotypical feminine body shape shouldn't be wearing "women's clothes." "
No, by my logic, they seriously SHOULD, because their figures need all the feminine accentuation they can get. Even if they don't fit into the outfit well, it wouldn't look out of place because it would be expected of them to have and/or want those proportions. When it comes to a male, unless he's secretly a trans person, it would make no sense, and just conflicts with him.
π: 0 β©: 1
i'm gonna ramble on for a bit, apologies in advance. i dunno if you'll even read it but i enjoyed writing it and looking up fancy clothes lol.
any kind of dress, really, from the straight dresses to that wedding look and anything in between. men actually have worn things that taper at the waist and then flare out at the bottom, in a manner similar to the aforementioned wedding dresses. one thing i really enjoy from the Victorian era is that men's coats had this style. it looked slim and sleek, yet not "emasculating."
Victorian coats
flared tunic
i'm not actually sure if these are tunics but i'm going with it
look at this dinky waist
though not dresses by any means, i know there are some styles of doublets that would go in at the waist and have a small flare at the bottom. and i guess i should also point out that a smaller waist would bring out the broadness of the shoulders, so it's not even a thing accentuating female features, necessarily..
well, not wearing lace in the manner of my drawing, at least as far as i know. i'm not even sure if lingerie in the sense that we know it today was invented at that time. i just meant general lace, like on the ruffs and collars worn there would be lacy patterns, and on the ends of sleeves there might be some as well. cravats were sometimes adorned in the same way.Β
lacy cuffs and sleeves, also see the flare (though i know the cuirass likely only tapers so much because it was designed to perch on the hips)
lacy collar
more lacy collar stuff
objectively speaking, men wearing lace should have no correlation to how submissive or how gay they are. after all, the images i provided are of...nobility and royalty, which had...a lot of power. some of them beings kings, they would be considered the most powerful men of their time. i mean, i agree with you, lace looks flimsy and delicate, and it is. but it's of my opinion that men can rock that look too. and it's not really about what he's wearing, it's how he wears it, and who's wearing it. a small and feminine guy is going to look small and feminine no matter what you put him in, unless it's very padded, baggy, or a full suit of armour. and of course, purely because there's this...association of weakness with what is considered women's clothing, it kind of makes men seem more kickass for daring to wear it.Β
regardless of whether men wore heels for the purpose of horseriding, it wasn't considered women's wear. later on, they became a status symbol rather than something entirely for practicality, which meant they spread to women of nobility. and then suddenly...as the culture and time dictated, heels were for women. i can't help but feel so much of what we think about what is FOR women and FOR men is highly dictated by present day present time standards that we were raised in and frankly brainwashed to accept. it's just like how other fashion fads have changed through the ages, and they're such a fickle thing. i don't even understand what exactly dictates it. how did we get from 70's fashion to what we have now? and how, in the 80's, glam metal and rock/hair bands, whatever you wanna call them, were considered cool and fine. men wearing makeup, androgynous clothing, with long, styled hair.
ah, that is true. but, if you don't really have the things you want to accentuate then, there's not much work to be done. wearing something that tapers at the waist or tight clothing isn't going to do much if you don't have a small waist or an even/large shoulder to hip ratio to begin with. padded pushup bras are something that could work, i suppose. i don't see many flared dresses or skirts these days, or ones with padding/structural wiring around the butt/hips, which would actually help a bit..but i digress...
and i guess this is a point where we will differ no matter what. i don't feel like women should be shoehorned into femininity, and that men should be excluded from embracing femininity. i find it just as attractive when women wear suits and guys wear heels and skirts as would the reverse be. maybe that has something to do with me being bisexual, though i don't really know why it would. and you talk about how women should bring prominence to their feminine features, but what do men's clothes even bring to the table to help men's features pop out? men's clothing these days is just...some shapeless sacks. half the time when i get clothes i go to the women's section because men's clothes are boring, and they usually aren't even tight enough to show indication of muscle. suits and blazers do sometimes have padding in the shoulders, but in my personal experience the rest of it kind of looks like..a paper bag dangling off you, unless you get something tailoured. honestly if men's t-shirts and stuff were tapered at the waist, it could help bring out the idealized inverted triangle shape instead of just looking like a sad rectangle or a cucumber with a tent hanging off of you.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm going to have to disagree. I think male clothing from the Victorian era is exceptionally emasculating.
Almost parodic in a sense.Β
"Β and i guess i should also point out that a smaller waist would bring out the broadness of the shoulders, so it's not even a thing accentuating female features, necessarily.."
That would be true. However, if the smaller waist is accompanied by larger hips, it will distract from the shoulders, and almost look like intersex anatomy. It just wouldn't harmoniseΒ well.Β
"association of weakness with what is considered women's clothing, it kind of makes men seem more kickass for daring to wear it. "
Yes, it is brave of a guy to not care about how plowable he looks. It doesn't mean he isn't emasculated, or weak, but that he just doesn't care about being perceivedΒ that way.
Besides, I never denied the existenceΒ of lace within male fashion entirely.Β
I specifically referred to it being used with feminine clothing, such as stockings.Β
It's kind of like high heels.
Sure, men in the past had them, but you rarely saw them combined with a pink bow propped on top of them (something traditionally on female shoes).
"honestly if men's t-shirts and stuff were tapered at the waist, it could help bring out the idealized inverted triangle shape instead of just looking like a sad rectangle or a cucumber with a tent hanging off of you."
Yeah, I don't see anything wrong with that. A shirt is different from a dress. The tapered waist would end, but in a dress it would continue and expand at the hips.
π: 0 β©: 1
Why are you here though if you don't like it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Why are you commenting if you don't like my comment? Does this fucking idiotic question ever get old?
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, come on then... tell us why?
π: 0 β©: 1
Why are you a hypocritical idiot?
π: 0 β©: 1
Gives the rest of humanity something to laugh at.
π: 0 β©: 1
Because we all need something to laugh at
π: 0 β©: 1
Mature Content
Nuff said.
π: 0 β©: 1
You adolize the concept of intersex deformities.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
I meant "adolize"
that's a demon
π: 0 β©: 1
you still haven't answered my question 
π: 0 β©: 1
that's not an adolize either
π: 0 β©: 1
still not an adolize! those are smile faces you silly goose!
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh well, the queen wasn't built to solve the peasant's mysteries.Β Β
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>