HOME | DD
fbuk β CA01
Published: 2011-10-05 16:44:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 88755; Favourites: 1726; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
beachRelated content
Comments: 425
this is beautiful the lighting! the colors and her expression just perfect!!
π: 0 β©: 0
nice work with lighting...clean image. any editing done?!
π: 0 β©: 0
This one isn't bad. Just sort of typical. Maybe you could try being more abstract with your shots? Experiment with themes more, so your images don't look so generic. A lot of your shots look the same, branch out! Try something new! I bet you'd be happy with the outcome, and attract more publicity; people who appreciate your photography skills rather than the hot models.
π: 0 β©: 1
I totally agree with MANGMANG...Its like different models but same pose and compositions...giving an impression like the work is for some adult magazine...!! Sorry, but yes you definitely have more than photographer skills...go for experimenting...with different themes & locations etc.,
π: 0 β©: 0
Her face looks good on this one, but donΒ΄t like the nails =s
π: 0 β©: 0
Nice picture. The girl kind of looks like Megan Fox.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yep, looks like her.
π: 0 β©: 0
To those that 'this is not art'
>implying everything on dA is 'art'
π: 0 β©: 0
i thought this is deviantART. ART. ART. ART.
this photo is EMPTY.
no emotions
not even a real human body.
this is just fake, boring and not even close to art.
btw, if THATS what men want these days, well, then...
...i feel very sorry for all men.
she has no proportions (where are the HIPS, legs, hands??) everything is fake on her and she is just skinny.
nothing looks womanly on her. oh maybe her hair. but thats about it....lord...look at those ugly hands.
she ruined her body by herself. how stupid is that?! am i the only one who thinks her proportions
(huge fake baloon-chest <--> no hips) are very disturbing and gross?
well just my two cents. and no im not jealous. im actually happy that i dont look like THIS.
im happy that i look like a woman.
oh and im happy that i can see the difference between art and a ugly pornphoto.
π: 0 β©: 4
Wow, way to tare the poor girl apart. If someone analyzed someones body who wasn't "pretty", manm how insulted everyone would be. But because this girl altered her body, and is being portrayed sexually, it's totally cool to rip on her?
That's a backwards mentality. "Oh no, she should put clothes on and look like we tell her to!"
That's what I'm hearing here.
And to say someone doesn't look like a woman, who are you to say that? Why does a woman have to look like anything in particular? Why can't a woman look how she wants to? Why is a skinny woman any less valuable than a curvy one? You can knock her body, but goodness forbid anyone say anything about an overweight girl.
And about her fake breasts, people alter their bodies all the time. They dye their hair, get piercings, tattoos, how are fake breasts any different?
π: 0 β©: 1
ah dont get me wrong.
yes i wasnt sugarcoating anything. its only my opinion (and the opinion of many other ppl) that this kind of women arent, well... pretty. but media told us: you are only pretty when you look like THIS. and im so sick of this message. look at media, any kind, and youll see how brainwashed we are. also, men expect women to look like this a lot. this is what pisses me off.
oh and this photo is still no art for me. you could put an overweight person on this photo and i would still say its "empty".
π: 0 β©: 1
I've never known any guys that expect me, or anyone else to look like that. I think girls put a million times more pressure on other girls than guys ever do. Because we tare each other apart just like you were doing here.
How can you really say we're brainwashed that way anymore? Look at the comments, how many of them trash the poor girl just as much as you did?
You may say it looks empty, but you wouldn't go on about how she doesn't look like a real woman, and how she's disgusting.
π: 0 β©: 1
how can you say we arent brainwashed??
you have to be really blind if you dont see
the pressure of media on women.
also i have the right to find her disgusting
just as much as you have the right to find
her pretty or whatever.
im not going to discuss this anymore under this
"art". if you wish to talk, you can send me a note.
π: 0 β©: 1
Brighteyed-AL knows where it's at.
You judge a person based completely on their looks, when that's exactly what you wouldn't want done to you.
Sure, you can find her "disgusting", but it's a completely different thing to be disgusted at somebody, then to call them out on it. You don't get to just say what you want, when you want to. That's blatantly rude and absolutely, without exception, socially unacceptable.
We're not brainwashed, you're just upset that the world doesn't revolve around your twisted view of how people NEED to look.
π: 0 β©: 1
if my opinion offends you then i cant do anything about it.
i really dont care.
and no, im not upset, nor im ugly or something like that. im happily married. thanks.
im not dictating how people NEED to look.
its just sad that people like on this photo are considered "perfect" these days.
THAT is a twisted view. THAT is brainwashing done by media and our society.
if you prefer these type of women (and you clearly do by looking at your favorites)
then thats your good right. good luck in finding someone like that ^-^
also my comment is kinda old and i said i dont want to discuss this further under that photo.
you just could have sent me a note or something if YOU are so much upset about some opinion
from an unimportant person like me. get over it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nobody on this planet is considered "perfect".
It's you who has a twisted view on what others think. You're clearly a pessimist who thinks the worst of the humanity is all we have to offer. Perfection, by its nature, is unattainable, and everybody knows this. We can only come so close, but everybody's definition of perfection is different.
π: 0 β©: 1
im not a pessimist or have a twisted view, dear.
its hilarious how you judge my personality based on ONE unimportant comment.
im done with this useless conversation. have a good day!
.
π: 0 β©: 0
Amen!~
I am a dude, and I don't even like it to watch this.....
π: 0 β©: 0
this type of garbage disgusts me D:
should be banned from dA
π: 0 β©: 1
OH HAAAAAAA!
π: 0 β©: 0
I think it is unfair with the Photographer that all these people are going feminazi on him because of the fake breasts, He didnt forced the girl to put silicone. He is only making his job and some of you people are being very rude by the way.
And why is so wrong for a woman do what she wants with her own body?! If she likes her hair straightned, or her breast bigger, thats how she feels confortable with her body, and what is wrong with that? It is the same thing as using make up, or high heels, or corsets or not using them at all!!
π: 0 β©: 1
It's not a matter of it being the fake breasts or how she dolls up. There's more outrage towards this because this isn't something to considered as art. Look at the guy's gallery and you'll see that most of the things he post on here are more fitted for a porn site rather than an art site. Don't you find it unfair yourself that this kind of image gains more popularity over the ones that actually depicts beauty and is meaningful?
π: 0 β©: 1
well, many pelople was just point out: "ohh fake breasts, fake hair, fake ect" like it was some type of crime against all woman on earth.
And well i dont like this type of photo either (i dont like girls). But seriously, DA is full of Not-Art making front pages every day. So i still think it is rude to call his work "trash". It is clearly inside the regulamentations of DA, and it still have efforts on it(its not just some cellphone picture of the cleavage of a big breasted girl, if you know what i mean).
I know that there are maaany artists that are much better than him, but lets face it "sex" sells a lot, you can see this in music, TV, and many other stuff too.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm very disappointed that this made the front page. Obviously the people faving this are liking it because of the large fake breasts. There is nothing in this submission that screams art; the pose is nothing sensational, the background clashes horribly, and everything screams 'fake.' This kind of photography is something you'll usually find on a porn site, along with the rest of the the photographer's submissions, and should not be considered as 'art.' There are so many artistic nudes that deserve more attention than this because on a website that's supposed to be dedicated to the appreciation of art and self-expression, this is trash.
π: 0 β©: 1
RIGHT YOU ARE!
Jeez, I wish people wouldn't consider this 'art'
π: 0 β©: 0
Bitches be hating. The picture looks good, the model looks good. End.
π: 0 β©: 0
Gnarly hands and fake boobs are disgusting. Very pretty face though.
π: 0 β©: 0
Boobs= instant faves and love from so many. It's so sad.
π: 0 β©: 0
Oddly enough there are a lot of...angry comments on this picture. Probably due to the fact it's on the front page. So i'll try to be actually helpful
The model is very pretty at first glance. This is one of those first glance pictures that loses their charm the more you look at it. The breast do look fake (idk if its Photoshopped that way or not) but based on what other people said the image does look OVER Photoshopped. None the less this is a GLAMOUR PORTRAIT (<--key word people) so she is suposed to look.....glamourized. It is a beautiful shot all around which fits the category, but everything about the model seems too fake for anyone to relate to her or have that connection.
Grant it some may say these commenters are jealous of the model and i would of been too if everything about her wasn't glued on, straightened, flattened and implanted. Even jealousy is an emotional attraction that can work in your favor.
π: 0 β©: 0
Obviously fake boobs and an obviously fake beach... not loving it..
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm not saying that I am for or against this picture, but why does it seem that all the haters are always women? Jealous much?
π: 0 β©: 1
....mayyybe that's also gotta do something with being disgusted at men liking stuff like that. about how much the model is reduced to sex only (in a in-your-face-way that doesn't appeal to me (as a woman)), i don't think this has got to do a lot with art but more with pornography, as there is nothing in the picture, from her pretty much naked body, the slutty pose and gaze to her big fake boobs, along with all the other FAKE hair, nail, all the make up and so on, that's NOT aimed at the (mostly male) viewer, saying 'here i am naked, you can do whatever you like to me and you don't even gotta call me afterwards, don't treat me like a person, i'm totally okay with being just meat for you, i enjoy this, i don't get why other women wouldn't want that?'... This woman wouldn't work as a friend for a female, so evidently she is viewed as competitor and rival. of course many women do not approve of this picture.
that's what i think at least.
btw, as for the model, nice (slut) pose... and needless to say, of course she's got a great body. sure. congrats on that one. not much to say about the lightning or anything else i think. usually i wouldn't bother commenting on this, but your comment made me want to clear some things up.
π: 0 β©: 2
Good point. Yes she is degrading herself. BUT you are helping me prove my point as well. That the majority of the haters are female. Some guys are into sluts (most im sure) and some aren't. It's a part of life. Hating and calling her a whore/slut probably doesn't bother her at all. They say hate makes one more known/famous. And that's all you guys are doing, giving her that one more view. Therefore making her popular
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't exactly understand how she is degrading herself here.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>