HOME | DD
Published: 2011-02-22 20:51:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 102615; Favourites: 2065; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
stairsRelated content
Comments: 302
anitapeachesart [2013-08-19 03:03:12 +0000 UTC]
...........ooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mpd73 [2012-11-17 11:57:23 +0000 UTC]
she is looking like kim kardasian...love that spread while hiding the private parts....both at top and bottom...and love that tummy...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sportyoldude [2012-05-09 02:02:26 +0000 UTC]
If they had girls like this when I was in school, they would have had to have the Sheriff's Department forcibly evict me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
J-BIRDSPRINGS [2012-04-18 18:32:27 +0000 UTC]
Really hot, like the way the hair is, and the pose is fine!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
akillovescamilia [2011-11-11 16:13:40 +0000 UTC]
would have been great if she had bite her lips instead
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
giolove1 [2011-02-27 23:59:28 +0000 UTC]
wow! You just about started a riot with this.....Keep doin what ya doin...!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
greenglo [2011-02-27 19:38:12 +0000 UTC]
Nice pic. Just curious what kind of lighting are you using?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Captain-Sweden [2011-02-23 22:08:32 +0000 UTC]
Is this porn? Perhaps. I've seen *worse*, here and elsewhere.
Should you have put a mature tag on it? Yes. It's easy to do and you will not need to endure complaints about it, and surely you don't want kids to find this, right?
Is it art? Not really IMHO, but that's subjective. You do know the craftsmanship of photographing, at least.
Does she look good? Well, I favved it, didn't I?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Captain-Sweden In reply to Captain-Sweden [2011-02-23 22:13:06 +0000 UTC]
Forget the last sentence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fbuk In reply to CaptainRumsz [2011-02-23 21:54:18 +0000 UTC]
even bigger question is why you clicked it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CaptainRumsz In reply to fbuk [2011-02-23 21:55:13 +0000 UTC]
Because I wanted to share my thoughts on this photograph.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LivingDemon [2011-02-23 21:20:46 +0000 UTC]
oh goddess of sexiness.....
from now on, I worship u and u alone.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cubealo [2011-02-23 21:14:26 +0000 UTC]
I'm still contemplating whether or not this can be classified as "art." I'm going to consider it "soft porn," for the time being. I'm really not a photographer, so I'm not an expert on photograph classification. But, judging from my knowledge (which can, definitely, be proven wrong) this is "soft porn." Not really "art" in my humble opinion, but a "soft porn" image. Although the lighting and quality is very good, I still think that it's not an artistic idea. I'm just one of those people who search for the meaning of the picture, rather than just looking at it and thinking "that's pretty, looks like art to me." I usually look for the meaning, not the look of the picture. And, to me, what this picture is blatantly suggesting is sex. Just sex. Nothing else.
That's just my two cents. This comment isn't meant to be neither positive nor negative. Just my opinion. That's all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
viliusm In reply to Cubealo [2011-02-23 21:26:09 +0000 UTC]
Check out Oscar Niemeyer and his works. He himself says he draws inspiration from the women. So in a way saying 'just sex' isn't right, especially when it's an inspiration to a lot of great artists.
And not too many people get a chance to design a whole city, might i add
Cheers!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cubealo In reply to viliusm [2011-02-23 21:34:25 +0000 UTC]
I'm sure it is. Like I said, I can always be proven wrong. It was just my opinion, is all. I'm not a flamer in the least.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cubealo In reply to viliusm [2011-02-23 22:17:09 +0000 UTC]
I know that. I just wanted to make that known.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MNZproductions [2011-02-23 21:03:01 +0000 UTC]
awesome photo. but personally, i would have rather have her not wear heels. its unrealistic: no one really walks in high school hallways wearing heels.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
oamanu [2011-02-23 20:59:15 +0000 UTC]
._. this is ranging porn advert... and I don't even care. -drool-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chesterslinkinlady [2011-02-23 20:50:20 +0000 UTC]
I'm surprised she isn't holding a dildo. Not art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Gregatron In reply to chesterslinkinlady [2011-02-24 23:55:23 +0000 UTC]
An ill-educated comment. Considering the technical aspects of photography, lighting, make up, pose, and composition, of course this is art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
chesterslinkinlady In reply to Gregatron [2011-02-25 01:09:52 +0000 UTC]
So by those standards I could do some nice lighting and composition on a pile of dog crap and call it just as much art.
The only different between than and this is that this has cleavage and open legs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gregatron In reply to chesterslinkinlady [2011-02-25 12:21:08 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely you could call it art. In fact Piero Manzoni did something similar back in the 60's. Would the image still not be art if the creator had painted it instead of taking a photo?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chesterslinkinlady In reply to Gregatron [2011-02-25 23:57:48 +0000 UTC]
The technical ability is not what is in question. It's the taste of the matter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
F0r3v3RiNl0v3 In reply to chesterslinkinlady [2011-03-05 09:32:00 +0000 UTC]
and everybody has different taste.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Charvatres In reply to chesterslinkinlady [2011-02-23 21:00:43 +0000 UTC]
While I generally like the whole "everything is art" mentality, I really wish there was at least an original artistic concept/idea here that isn't just 'loads of makeup; dress like a slut'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fbuk In reply to Cherrypopz [2011-02-23 20:54:48 +0000 UTC]
says more about your warped mind, how you think of dildos when viewing a picture of a women
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Cherrypopz In reply to fbuk [2011-02-23 20:56:41 +0000 UTC]
At least I'm not insulting people that do not like my stuff. What's LH4 stands for? Loose Hole #4?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Charmed-Technician In reply to Cherrypopz [2011-02-23 21:18:14 +0000 UTC]
Cherrypopz is a better troll than most. Kind of funny, actually when she said 'Loose Hole #4', could also be referred to as her username.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StrAtAsfeAr93x In reply to Cherrypopz [2011-02-23 20:59:04 +0000 UTC]
You're an idiot. End of story.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>

























