HOME | DD
felkus — help, i'm stuck
#mmd #mikumikudance #pmxeditor
Published: 2018-03-19 21:23:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 5925; Favourites: 37; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Twist bones on a right base were successfully fixed after using "semistandard bones plugin", on a left base they weren't, why? :сYes, after plugin's work it has become better.. but bones still dont work the way they should, it's so weird
Is there another plugin for fixing the fixing plugin?
Or maybe I've used the plugin in a wrong way?
anyway for now I replaced the left base's file with this "almost fixed" base because previous version is just..even worse? p-p
*sorry if I messed up with tenses feel free to correct me
Related content
Comments: 23
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Have you fixed this yet? I've had problems similar to this with VRoid bases haha. One time with another base I completely deleted the arm bones, replaced them with another model's arm bones + used rigging plugin for the bone weighing, it seemed to work. Maybe try that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mistress: you legit took off the preview images that had the models being covered correctly don't understand why but let met put this in your head again and let me put in caps locks this time. Tried being nice the first time but you wish to be a complete disrespectful a hole about this, fine. UPDATE THE DAMN IMAGES OF YOUR DAMN PREVIEW OF THE NAKED TDA BASES THAT DO NOT BELONG TO YOU AT ALL THAT HAVE RULES ON THEM THAT STATES TO NOT UPLOAD NO NAKED BASE IMAGE OR VIDEO AT ALL DO YOU COMPREHEND IT NOW?? CAN I GET THIS FROM YOU??
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
why did you work yourself up so much about this? why are you getting mad and making yourself feel stressed over this? TDAs rules do not permit "R18 Content"- there are PLENTY of nude TDA bases on the internet simply because they are not entirely defined as 'R18' as they have no sexual organs. This person is asking for help with bone errors, and the best way to portray their issue was with a nude model. I can guarantee you TDA would not have a problem with this as it has been asked before. It is not sexually gratifying content- it is an issue with bones that they are requesting help for. The nude model itself is not what they are focusing on. Think of it as a clay model you are making of a human, but plan to add clothes to later, but it has no organs, just basic human features. You would not view that as sexual, right? Same thing here. Don't work yourself up so much about it and be calm. At the end of the day, this is the internet and you shouldn't let it get to you. And finally, this poster's native language is clearly not English. It's Russian, I believe? Which is completely different than English and they must be very confused. 'a hole' and 'legit' may not come out as you'd like them to in a translating program, or a non-native english speaker's head. Have a nice day and good luck in future endeavors but try not to get so stressed \o/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
uhh... when did I call them innocent or defend them on a personal level? if you misinterpreted my message, I'm sorry for not explaining it better. my intention was to clear up something that was seemingly a form of miscommunication in the fact that TDA doesn't say "don't upload naked models", they don't permit R18 content (sexually graphic, gore, etc) and that you shouldn't get so worked up about something that... shouldn't have that sort of effect, and to see it from another person's perspective.
not to mention, they aren't actually a rulebreaker from what I can see with this image, and that's what I was trying to explain in a passive manner without bringing up any other topic....
your reply is really strange, as even though I've seen you in the past, I tried to be passive. I don't know this uploader personally nor do I follow their work, I was just looking at this and leaving my two cents. as in, my opinion. but you attacked me on a personal level, telling me i have a "lackluster gallery" and a "hypocrite" with a "shitty self". when did I once insult you or the OP? Your point about "why are you defending a person for breaking another persons rules when you don't care at all" can be shot right back at you. "why are you attacking a person for breaking another persons rules, whom you have no personal connection with, when you shouldn't care at all?"
I see that screenshot and it's a completely different situation. That was uploaded after someone claimed to have made some of my edits, which I have put many, many hours of work into as their own edits, and then when confronted as such, insulting my work and spreading lies about me. I don't know why you had to bring up something from my DA when that wasn't the subject at all?
"Dense reply"...
A lackluster gallery to me means nothing; I don't use DA often, nor will I ever, hence why I've only seen this just now. My youtube is where I upload my content, and I don't even upload often. Please stop insulting me when I have done nothing to instigate such mannerisms.
Thanks, and have a good night?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Before you show definitions of words, please understand them in their entirety. Because it seems you didn't.
Especially since you used the wrong definition of prohibition for this issue.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Do note I was not meaning to insult you. Rather I was trying to educate you on how to use words properly. If I couldn't comprehend "such big words" then I wouldn't have been accepted into college. Actually, I wouldn't have graduated high school for that matter.
But let me get back to the topic at hand. You highlighted the definition of "Prohibition" which was related to the ban on making, transporting, and selling of alcohol within the 1920s to the 1930s. This definition DOES NOT relate to the definition of the word "Prohibition" used within TDA's rules. It would closely relate to "The act of prohibiting by authority" and "An order to restrain or stop"
As I've said, please understand the definition of a word you're going to use as an example before you use it. The way you used it in your previous reply was rather inappropriate.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
There's a lot wrong with this post. I'm not going to reply after this because it's unnecessary and it's a public post which we are clogging with our debate, so please keep that in mind if you reply.
TDA's rules, are TDA's. In the end, although this is not yours, mine or OP's model, it is TDA's. That doesn't mean you should harass someone over what you define as a violation of TDA's original rules; most creators will ask you to refer them to the original rules/online post/website and request the poster to take down their post/creation, but not harass them. You confronted them with the rules, asked them to stop, and they didn't. Your job is done. You can't do anything more. Yelling at them is most definitely not going to get them to take their post down; in fact, it will probably just make them ignore you or block you. So I don't see what the point is. You cannot even report them for copyright because you would have to be the copyright holder in order to do such, which you aren't. If you wanna go the extra mile, e-mail TDA with a link to this post, and see if he tries to get it taken down! There you go; that's it. No more drama, you did your part.
But you didn't.
I viewed your screenshots, and my TDA readme is different than yours. prntscr.com/p39627
Whether it is outdated or simply different/concerning a different model, I'm unsure. But I can verify it is from 2018 at the least. I find it interesting that you tried to mock me with your "definition of prohibition" picture, whereas you highlighted the definition of prohibition concerning the ban of alcohol in North America in the 1920s and early 30s. I am not the one who doesn't understand the definition here, apparently. And in response to your "X-Rated" definition, that was my argument in the first place. In your readme, it appears to me that he is banned X-rated expression. As you said, "explicit sexual material or activity". Explicit meaning obvious/clearly/undoubtedly, and sexual material/activity meaning in a sexual manner or practice/for sexual gratification. What I was trying to explain is that a picture of a "naked" model that has no sexual organs is not considered sexual or R-18. Some Asian countries have harsh censorship laws relating to the exposure of R-18/Sexual content, which I assume is what that rule is there to cover for in the first place; breasts are generally not included in those bans because some argue they are not a "sexual organ".
"didn't really quoted my entire sentence for what i said -rather made it out to be as something bad, when in all honesty it wasn't."
So you are telling me insulting someone is not considered "something bad"? That's your opinion. It doesn't matter whether I quote the entire sentence or not because you know what you said and it's a scroll-up away from being seen. It is still EXTREMELY rude and offensive, at least to me; and that is why I quoted it. I can see if you would be angry if I took it out of context in a conversation including multiple people, but it seems that you and I are the only debaters here. So, please stop reaching for things to throw.
I don't mean to insult TDA since I admire their work and agree that rules should be followed. And, I have a question.
How do you know TDA cares? Do you know them personally? Do you have their phone number? You cannot state everything as if you know it for 100%-certain. I don't believe my case was special. I don't at all, and I've seen countless others have the same situation. I don't need a sob story, nor was I intending to give such, I meant to clear up your misunderstanding. I am not asking for sympathy.
"I was aiming towards the fact of how you display yourself in general on DA. You're* bland, and fake. That's what I meant. Not insulting you -well until now because of how fake you are :')"
...Did you read that sentence over? LMFAO?
"You're bland and fake"
"Not insulting you- well until now because of how fake you are"
Fake is considered an insult. Bland is considered an insult. If it is my gallery, it pertains to me, myself & I. That is indirectly insulting me. It's like going up to a piece of art at a museum, laughing, calling it bland and then saying "well I wasn't insulting you". But you are, you are insulting my work and/or how I display myself/my work.
Sure, I've made mistakes in the past and broken rules. But that's how humans learn; we learn from our mistakes (hopefully...) and refrain from repeating them. When I first started playing around with MMD I think I must've been 11 or 12. Not reading MMD model rules was like not reading the Terms of Service before downloading an app to me at the time. LOL. But I don't do that anymore, because I've grown as a person.
It's 12 AM and I'm not going to respond to things in this post that I don't need to. You seem overly sassy for someone just trying to state the rules and facts. It's like you enjoy yelling at people. LMAO
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Нужна ещё помощь или нет?... ;-;
Как всегда вовремя, ага...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
да, нужна, никто не смог помочь хд
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Personally when I have these kinds of issues i just click on the x rotation bones and unselect "axis limit". if it's already unselected than i usually just select it and test that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nah, didn't work for me
thanks for the comment, maybe next time
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Have you tried deleting the hidden bones too? There should be some hidden bones around the x-rotation bone. If that doesn’t work,I know Cactislook made a tutorial for it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cactisloom*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I deleted invisible ones too and recreated with a plugin
I'll try her tutorial, thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 0