HOME | DD
FiliusTonitrui β Accurate Spinosaurus Model (PC: E, mod) for MP: NG
Published: 2016-07-22 04:23:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 3428; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 34
Redirect to original
Description
Modified using XPS, this is an accurate version of Primal Carnage: Extinction's Spinosaurus (Volcano skin).I changed the shape of the sail and the size of the arms after a user corrected me.
The model was converted for XPS byΒ
Related content
Comments: 16
Legs should be a bit longer... but It's still better than quadrupedal.
π: 0 β©: 1
I do not see how they are shorter, but thanks for trying to correct me
I was told the sail is innacurately shaped. If I remember to, I will fix it by the weekend.
π: 0 β©: 0
the sail isnt the right shape
the dip wasnt that deep and the front should be more angular
it also has a baryonyx head
π: 0 β©: 1
Turns out you are right about the sail. I will see if I update all of the deviantations with it in the weekend (and please remember me). Thanks.
Well, I can not change everything in the head. But do not worry: may extract and convert The Isle's spinosaurus some time after it is added.
π: 0 β©: 1
the isle's spinosaurus looks fine
id give it lips but it isnt my game
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually it did not have lips. Since it had croc like sensors, lips of any kind would prevent these from working properly.
There is a chance that it had lips close to the teeth that were more behind the nostrils (if we take a front look at it), but we may never know.
π: 0 β©: 1
the holes also resemble that to the holes found in monitor lizard skulls
all of my drawing are checked by a team of around 12 people who have lots of experience in paleontology
π: 0 β©: 1
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia⦠this is a replica of an actual specimen. Notice the tiny holes above the front teeth. These are not foramina, as foramina (that are clearely seen in lizards and T. rex) are never widely spread trough the snout.
The part that is bellow where the nostril would eb located however...
Also only because these people have experience in paleontology it does not mean they are always right as other paleontoligists may disagree with them and many theories were already proven to be wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
but i dont think you have ANY paleontologists supporting you
after RJ and the isle team have mentioned you
π: 0 β©: 1
RJ and most of this team are just stuck up people that only accept papers if these are given by authorities. Try to disagree with some of them single aspect and they will start to hate you.
I do not care if any biased paleontologist supports me. If he is dumb enough to believe on anything his friends say then I am happy with it.
π: 0 β©: 1
but you have no scientific credibility
have you even taken a college biology course?
if you have you would know that you NEED to have your papers peer reviewed first
alot of papers are not credible because their science isnt done well or they screw with results to get the answer they want
you seem to not get how paleobiology or paleontology in general works
π: 0 β©: 1
"but you have no scientific credibility
have you even taken a college biology course?" because people who have scientific credibility are always right and lets forget about the Witmerlab scientist that said that lizards are lipless and that dinosaurs were lipless and cheekless, that Horner's scavenging T. rex theory was refuted just like the "toroceratops nonsense", that Ibrahim made his spinosaurus have too short legs, etc, etc, etc.
"if you have you would know that you NEED to have your papers peer reviewed first" I once showed papers and data as a justification for the saurian team to correct some aspects of their models. They did not pay attention.
"alot of papers are not credible because their science isnt done well or they screw with results to get the answer they want" what happened with the fact that "I need credibility"?
"you seem to not get how paleobiology or paleontology in general works" said the person that shows to blindly believe in anything any authority says despite all the mistakes done in the past.
π: 0 β©: 1
we dont blindly believe stuff
we look at the evidence
you need to practice good science and actually do the work
you irish catholic
π: 0 β©: 1
But what about when there is no evidence available but you know enough about the aspect to say for yourself?
Do you really think that I do not look at evidence and that I only think about it when I am able to?
Did you know that sometimes an evidence may be wrongly interpretated by a paleontologist, like when Horner saw T. rex's arms as evidence for scavenging behaviour and ignored it's jaws? Of course not. If you have enough knowledge to analize something for yoursef, then you CAN do it (authorities have enough knowledge to analize more aspects than peopel like me do, but this does not mean I can never disagree with them about an aspect that I know about).
Also why didn't you reply to the other paragraphs?
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks!
But it is not so difficult to change dimmensions with XNAlara. In fact: it is easy after you get used to the software.
π: 0 β©: 0