HOME | DD
FlexDreams — Fire
by-nc-nd
Published: 2008-06-07 12:30:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 23133; Favourites: 999; Downloads: 4642
Redirect to original
Description
Model: Estelle de Tristewww.FlexDreams.com
Related content
Comments: 80
Excellent look and the flow of the hair is perfect. Great shot.
Nick
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
И по правде напоминает костёр - отличная фотография!!Это просто обычный ветер или так устроено было?Amazing shot -it really does look like fire!!Is this normal wind or was this done especially to be like this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ветер. он иногда снизу дул)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
слушай классно 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You've been featured here: [link] . Don't forget to fave and comment, if you liked it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The upward reach of her hair, blazing with life as it is, coupled with what I see a determined expression, or one verging on anger, sells the image for me. It offers the sensation of an otherworldly power, too, which gives it a cool factor. Very nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i love her hair colour and shape, is like a flame!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Did I love this hair, he is a natural redhead?
She always wanted to be a redhead, therefore I paint rsrs
I loved the hair in the wind!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
you have been featured @Huge Photography Feature 1.0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
' Take a look to the sky, just before you die...it's the last time you will! '
Great colour..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I can't Critique because I'm not Sub'd.
---
Flex, I usually love your work.
This shot excels in many ways: the lighting dos great things for the blacks (clothes), face, and hair.
I also like the left-right symmetry of "hair-up"/cement-seams-down.
But.
I don't "know what to look at." The model? Not pretty. The piercings? Distracting. The hair? Well, yes, it *has* to be the dominant element--despite all the top-side "white space"--because Red is Red.
But the image raises questions--still along the line of "what/why?" What is she looking at? We don't see it, and her expression is so bland there is nothing to redeem her humanity/ Why is her hair flying up? Unnatural, glaringly contrived. "Couldn't happen."
"Why do I want to look at her?" I don't, I can't--because I don't understand her, or what's going on, or what she might be thinking.
Yes, I'm being critical, but this is an ernest attempt at a no-holds-barred critique.
I take one last look at it before stopping writing, and I see a "redeeming" take on it: That same "blandness" could be construed as Mystery: She knows, we don't; she knows where to look--we know not at what she looks; and whatever her attention is focussed upon, it's "up there," unknown, above, and thus the movement of her hair visually supports that overall sense of "up-there," "out-of-frame," unknowable.
LOVE LOVE LOVE and keep shooting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>