HOME | DD

flomacaroon — ...Pure..and..Carnal ....... Part.2..Carnal...

Published: 2012-07-04 10:37:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 772; Favourites: 22; Downloads: 21
Redirect to original
Description Oh yes, I can ;D

Part 1 - Pure = [link] <- Fluffy!
Related content
Comments: 16

Suricateuh [2014-02-10 20:27:46 +0000 UTC]

Awwww *.*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flomacaroon In reply to Suricateuh [2014-04-18 15:05:35 +0000 UTC]

*wink* *wink* ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zion2199cr [2013-11-07 16:11:28 +0000 UTC]

OMFG!!!!!!!! This is too hot!!!! Amazing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flomacaroon In reply to zion2199cr [2014-01-04 15:48:01 +0000 UTC]

awwww thank you so much!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SuperSarahCloud [2013-01-02 04:12:34 +0000 UTC]

Damn. I like it. Very nice photoshop work. Love the background. Good work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flomacaroon In reply to SuperSarahCloud [2013-01-02 17:10:24 +0000 UTC]

aww! :3 I'm glad you like it!!! \o/ it's a little bit nsfw without revealing too much LOL or maybe already revealing too much actually XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SuperSarahCloud In reply to flomacaroon [2013-01-12 18:33:18 +0000 UTC]

No it doesn't. It reveals just enough to make it drool worthy and completely hot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flomacaroon In reply to SuperSarahCloud [2013-01-26 09:00:12 +0000 UTC]

awwww!!! then I'm delighted I managed what I wanted ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dyufozeon [2012-12-10 22:34:57 +0000 UTC]

I cannot deal with this!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flomacaroon In reply to dyufozeon [2012-12-11 01:52:55 +0000 UTC]

oh really?

and why is that??

haha! ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Painirl [2012-08-25 10:50:06 +0000 UTC]

wow!! so shy>///////////////<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flomacaroon In reply to Painirl [2012-08-25 14:31:05 +0000 UTC]

oops, sorry, hope it's not too much to handle ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

reve-caramel [2012-07-04 19:44:32 +0000 UTC]

abtstractly erotic... and then the blindfold... OH MY!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flomacaroon In reply to reve-caramel [2012-07-04 20:11:34 +0000 UTC]

Well, like I said earlier, be careful, it's pipping hot! XD
Yes indeed, the most abstract figurative eroticism is, the better!
Lol, poor Gwen would was supposed to be in the picture! there's no more sign of her, whatsoever XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

reve-caramel In reply to flomacaroon [2012-07-05 06:28:28 +0000 UTC]

gwen? gwen who?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flomacaroon In reply to reve-caramel [2012-07-05 10:11:32 +0000 UTC]

'would was' is not English LOL stupid me XD

LOOOL Gwen? XD Never heard about this name before!! ;D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0