HOME | DD
flowwwer — in the way
Published: 2012-06-29 05:23:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 1412; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 23
Redirect to original
Description
~Related content
Comments: 29
mmm a little different with the black and white, i love this
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh, yessss.. thank you dear
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Besides newbie ignorance, this is beautiful, mon petit aubergine. I love the textures in the hair.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
For what? Having better art than you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
for sexual explicit content without a mature tag.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Human anatomy is not necessarily 'sexual explicit content'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
how is something natural, something we all have automatically sexually explicit? are you telling me that michelangelo's statues are sexually explicit, all the ancient greek depictions of the human form, how about the birth of venus? how about a mother breastfeeding her child, or images of cultures and tribes with nudity?...just because it is breasts, or any other part of the human body does NOT under any circumstance automatically deem it as sexually explicit...i do not understand, please do enlighten me[us]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i know what the technical definition of "sexually explicit" is so i mean i can see what you're getting at, sort of...but you can not automatically deem something in such a manner... sexually explicit is often a euphemism for pornography which this most certianly is not...as always there is so much beyond the obvious that needs to be considered. my main issue is that true art should never be censored...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Obviously she/he can't even come up with a proper reply other than *facepalm* to explain why they view this as 'sexually explicit'. So I don't really expect us to receive an intelligent explanation, much less normal decency. [It would be lovely to be proven wrong though.] As blake below said, please do grow up, and be a little more respectful when you have issues with someone's work in a public forum.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I understand that there are rules on da regarding nudity. I'm sure it wasn't the artists intent to shock anyone (in the way that some people come on here and post straight up pornography). What I don't understand is why you had to be so indecent about the whole thing. You could have sent a polite and private note saying that there are rules on da and that you would appreciate that they were followed. Posting "REPORTED" in the comments section is the most incredibly rude and immature way you could have gone about this. Please grow up and learn how to conduct yourself like a decent human being.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
well its nudity and i reported it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
people like you should really not own a computer because you obviously do not know how to act like an artist nor a human being.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ugh... it contains nudity and humans of all ages are on this site. what if a kid were to see this? im not insulting it it just makes me uncomfortable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
if it makes you feel uncomfortable feel free to stop looking at it. your art makes me feel uncomfortable so i choose not to look at it! ta da
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Couldn't have said it better myself!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That was to you Decieving, not AutumnTheChipette obviously. I do not agree with this reporting issue going on here. Ridiculous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hi you're a dumb furry and you should stop policing other people's artwork and work on improving yours. also, boobs are not sexually explicit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I technically understand your reason for reporting, but you could have been a lot more respectful about it. js
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No. They aren't. Breasts are not sexually explicit, they are natural, and every human has them. Female breasts are for feeding babies, to be blunt, and due to societal ideologies, are overly sexualized. If you saw a woman breastfeeding in public, would you be offended because you personally view breasts as sexual, and not naturally unoffensive anatomy? Seriously now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Okay, then. Way to go. You're the titty police I guess.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
