HOME | DD

Published: 2013-02-19 21:58:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 597; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description
Download for 1960x1470 resolutionThis is an in-zoom on the left side of the "body" in my precious deviation Swirling Around.
A 3D cross section of the 6 dimensional Quartic parameter space
Which 3 axis' are plotted and which 3 axis' are pointing into the 4th, 5th, and 6th spatial dimensions? At which positions at the plotted axis is the this fractal sliced and how is this slice rotated? Well, I leave to the reader to run the parameter file below and look after
Software: Ultra Fractal.
Formula: Quartic Parameterspace3 in the sp3-module written by my dear friend Greenseng here at DeviantART. All his modules, as well as mine can be downloaded from here.
Below the parameter file Play and have fun
ApproachingTheSub-swirls {
fractal:
title="Approaching the Sub-swirls" width=640 height=480 layers=1
credits="Ingvar Kullberg;2/14/2013"
layer:
caption="Background" opacity=100 method=linear
mapping:
center=-0.946968472825/-0.110666613607 magn=8.0429993
formula:
maxiter=250 percheck=off filename="spr.ufm" entry="Raytrace2"
p_maxiter=100 p_bailout=4.0 p_precision=10
p_Formula="Quartic Parameterspace" p_Fourth__Dimension=b_imag
p_Plotted_Space="a_real; a_imag; b_imag" p_Fourth_Dimension=Zk
p_Fourth_Dim=C_imag p_Fourth__Dim=Ck p_view=no p_MSet=Union
p_QMSet=Union p_init_zri=0/0 p_init__zri=0.5/0.0 p_init_zjk=0.0/0.0
p_init__zjk=0.0/0.0 p_cri1=-0.7/0.0 p_cjk1=0.0/0.0 p_cri2=-0.7/0.0
p_cjk2=0.0/0.0 p_cri3=-0.7/0.0 p_cjk3=0.0/0.0 p_bri=0.0/0.0
p_bjk=0.0/0.0 p_xrot=70 p_yrot=10 p_zrot=45 p_localrot=no
p_lightx=4.0 p_lighty=4.0 p_lightz=2.0 p_a_real=0.4 p_a_imag=0.0
p_b_real=0.2 p_b_imag=0.7 p_c_real=0.6 p_c_imag=0.2 p_fourthdim=0.0
p_zcenter=0 p_zlength=8 p_zpixels=4800 p_touchscreen=yes
p_Coloring=Raytrace2.ucl p_Background=Floating
p_Gradient="One Gradient" p_Cubic_Gradient="One Gradient"
p_Quartic_Gradient="Four Gradients"
inside:
transfer=none
outside:
transfer=linear filename="spr.ucl" entry="Raytrace2"
gradient:
smooth=no index=0 color=0 index=100 color=10855845 index=100 color=0
index=186 color=692460 index=199 color=16117728 index=200 color=0
index=292 color=4351 index=300 color=12713942 index=301
color=7667712 index=357 color=2752512 index=399 color=16777215
opacity:
smooth=no index=0 opacity=255
}
Related content
Comments: 16
FractalMonster In reply to Campo-Diaz [2013-02-22 17:17:32 +0000 UTC]
thank you
Glad you like any of my raw fractals
BTW, have you heard about fractals before?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Campo-Diaz In reply to FractalMonster [2013-02-23 09:50:00 +0000 UTC]
Yes I do... Interesting way of making art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FractalMonster In reply to Campo-Diaz [2013-02-23 16:49:40 +0000 UTC]
Fractal geometry is the math of the new science of chaos and complexity
Below some recycled info about fractals:
First: Check out the zoom sequences (only images) from page 4 in the pdf's [link] and [link] . The end motives are my deviations [link] and [link]
Second: In my journal [link] you have some links to short cool fractal animations I stumbled over at YouTube
Third: If you wanna try some free simple fractal software, go to my journal [link] . You don't need to know the math behind
Fourth: Wikipedia has a nice site [link]
Fifth: Maybe you would appreciate my "Chaotic series of fractal articles" [link] if you have a little theoretical interest
Hope you don't feel spammed
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Campo-Diaz In reply to FractalMonster [2013-02-24 10:55:05 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the information.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FractalMonster In reply to Campo-Diaz [2013-02-24 14:10:16 +0000 UTC]
My pleasure Hope you'll get some inspiration
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Greenseng [2013-02-19 23:18:34 +0000 UTC]
There are much activity in the Quartics.
I wonder about the higher polynomials?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FractalMonster In reply to Greenseng [2013-02-19 23:26:46 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, weare probly the only people in the world that so far have published 3D cross sections of Quratics
Yet more fantastic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Greenseng In reply to FractalMonster [2013-02-20 00:27:15 +0000 UTC]
It's hell of a work to write a new ( and better... ) tracer.
But this one is too slow. I have a picture on right now.
7 hours... I guess. Not so fun. When it can be made in 1 or 2 hours maybe.
Even if this one has 1000 iterations and a 3d-axis of 5000.
And a precision of 50. Size of 8000/4500.
Was first thinking about using a depth ( 3d-axis ) of 8000 but...
Then I guess it would at least take about 10 hours. Probably more.
I want to be able to make higher quality pictures with better coloring.
But... I know too little about graphics and tracing and programming.
F..k... I don't know anything at all...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FractalMonster In reply to Greenseng [2013-02-20 00:39:39 +0000 UTC]
You know ..
My last one, Swirls Hiding the Sky, took more than 6 hours on my machine, the Screen-depth was 14400 ..
.. and I know yet less
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FractalMonster In reply to JarshaNighhow [2013-02-19 22:14:35 +0000 UTC]
thank you so much
👍: 0 ⏩: 0