HOME | DD

Published: 2009-04-13 21:34:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 14652; Favourites: 292; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
world wide webit feed us, it watch us
available
stock thanks:
this pice won the third place in ~my-dark-desire originality contest
Related content
Comments: 101
doolhoofd [2012-12-30 09:58:14 +0000 UTC]
You're always free to read my texts if you like. You might like 'Dehumanisation,' in my Gallery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fudaryli In reply to doolhoofd [2013-01-11 00:22:03 +0000 UTC]
that's the point behind this artwork, well done for your text
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
simonpark81 [2012-09-02 11:39:26 +0000 UTC]
wooow,,,, once zoomed in this is absolutely horrifyinhg.
agree with your sentiments sir. scary stuff....but very true.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ana-Lesac [2011-11-13 14:20:23 +0000 UTC]
Can I be in love with you just on base of your art?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fudaryli In reply to Ana-Lesac [2011-11-16 03:14:40 +0000 UTC]
YES haha and i can be in love with you just because of you
naaaaa' i'm in love with my eternal muse, my wife.
thank you very much
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ajskrim [2010-02-09 18:50:44 +0000 UTC]
Heh... You're crazy 20th century Dali or sth.. Amazing job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
fudaryli In reply to ajskrim [2010-02-09 18:55:52 +0000 UTC]
haha, thank you very much, nice compliment
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mythbusterette [2009-12-16 05:07:41 +0000 UTC]
This is amazing. I like how you didn't hide her imperfections. Beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mythbusterette In reply to fudaryli [2009-12-16 07:09:11 +0000 UTC]
I love that you do that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Irratio [2009-08-11 14:33:13 +0000 UTC]
Great!
But: why is it so 'common-sense' or even 'necessary', everytime someone depicts technology, it automatically has this romanticist-negative layer on it?
Can someone answer that? I think it really has become a convention. Two spontaneous thoughts come to my mind: because Hollywood was (or still is?) stuck in Romanticism, and as remedy to bombardment of advertising.
Please help me out here!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fudaryli In reply to Irratio [2009-08-11 22:06:26 +0000 UTC]
well, is not a negative layer, either a matrix-style vision of the web, its more like telling the truth in a very graphical or literal way, like my description, it feed us, it watch us.
im not considering as a bad thing, its just my own aesthetic, i look for visual impact in my images
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheAphelion [2009-07-23 20:36:43 +0000 UTC]
Congratulations on the Creativity Contest! I have featured you here: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheAphelion [2009-07-23 01:11:46 +0000 UTC]
Congratulations my friend!! I don't know how this passed by my 'new deviations' without my seeing it (that seems to be happening a lot these days ) but none-the-less...this is fantastic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fudaryli In reply to TheAphelion [2009-07-26 04:00:36 +0000 UTC]
no problem, i miss some art sometimes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheAphelion In reply to fudaryli [2009-07-26 06:12:14 +0000 UTC]
Heheh good to know I'm not alone
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LaChicca [2009-07-23 00:16:38 +0000 UTC]
Hey! I love this piece of art-- it is creepy and surreal and makes us think about exactly how much time we spend online. The one thing that's bothering me is the eye-- it took me a little bit to figure out that it was actually an eye rather than one of those virtual reality visors, which also fits, I think. I'd suggest making it more obvious that it's an eye. Otherwise, fantastic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fudaryli In reply to LaChicca [2009-07-23 00:52:35 +0000 UTC]
well, as you said, fits on both directions i like that
thank you for your comment
see you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LaChicca In reply to fudaryli [2009-08-08 00:36:47 +0000 UTC]
You're very welcome, it's a wonderful piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MorganaVasconcelos [2009-06-17 09:23:52 +0000 UTC]
Hi hon
you have been featured here: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>