HOME | DD
Published: 2008-10-14 16:53:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 7813; Favourites: 416; Downloads: 164
Redirect to original
Description
.Related content
Comments: 17
simar [2009-11-21 10:52:15 +0000 UTC]
wow, you've taken some very impressive photographs!
well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pim-s [2009-10-24 08:35:43 +0000 UTC]
great work on the lighting, it create such a strange atmosphere, somehow irreal!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stateless [2009-10-24 01:45:54 +0000 UTC]
Just saw this on the DD listing and right away I knew who it belonged to. Wish I could fave it twice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
777Tails [2009-10-23 20:09:58 +0000 UTC]
Neat, it looks like they're in a semi-transparent box!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LeeAnnBates [2009-10-23 17:28:27 +0000 UTC]
I really like it. The shadows of the people especially!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
squarepants [2008-10-14 22:24:50 +0000 UTC]
Hey dude,
There's some interesting stuff going on down below with the silhouette of a person, a snipped off shadow, and then more detail on the dude in the light. It's like a transition of some sort going from obscurity to maturity or something.
That said, from where I'm sitting the big bright wall is hampering my efforts to appreciate the details; I find there's too much "light" in the tug of war between light and dark.
While I'm assuming that's kind of what you want, that - considering the title - the building is to be the primary focus, the supporting cast isn't pulling its weight. It's enough to "tickle" the eyeballs, but that's as far as it goes for me. I want there to be something more, but the wall is rudely interrupting my attention.
That's just my perspective...throwing it out there...see where it lands.
Ciao dude.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
azrael3000 In reply to squarepants [2009-10-23 20:03:12 +0000 UTC]
If your monitor is calibrated correctly you should see plenty of detail in the bright part of the wall.
Also I would be highly surprised if the building is considered the main part of the image by the photographer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
squarepants In reply to azrael3000 [2009-10-24 05:08:33 +0000 UTC]
a) As was mentioned, the posting was *my perspective*.
b) I didn't say that the wall didn't have detail.
c) Considering I'm not the photographer, all I have to go on is what my interpretation, not the original intention. See a) above.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0

























