HOME | DD

Published: 2008-03-30 23:57:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 14226; Favourites: 848; Downloads: 77
Redirect to original
Description
please read this if you're going to even attempt to argue meI'm fucking sick and tired of arguing this offline and on.
I don't give a shit what the "Bible" says, the Bible doesn't determine the meaning of the word animal.
GET THE HELL OVER IT!
Being an animal is based of biological properties, NOT BEHAVIOR, SPIRITUALITY OR INTELLIGENCE! In other words stop using the lame arguements: Humans have souls, cause wars, are smarter, have morals and any other bullshit related to our behavior.
THAT HAS NOTHING AND I REPEAT NOTHING TO DO WITH HUMANS BEING ANIMALS, DIMWIT!!!
Why can't you just look up what animal means instead of arguing using an outdated book?
Really would you argue that elephants aren't indangered because an outdated text says their population is fine? FUCK NO! So why argue the meaning of a word by using old text?
Meanings of words change over time, the definition of animal is one of those words and no amount of arguing with G-manluver will make your argument right.
You're wrong, humans are animals, you're wrong, too bad, so sad, use a dictionary, you're wrong!
The end!
PS: you can argue it here but again no amount of arguing will me with change the proper definition of animal
EDIT: apparently my stamp is the most popular one of the day D:. wow this did much better than presumed.
EDIT 2: I said get over it! So GET OVER IT. your faith is incapable of changing known information so quit with the "God made us special" crap because if you can't prove it (meaning first you'd have to prove God exist, than get him to prove he created humans than get him to prove he made them into a unique seperate lifeform from all other species) than you have no argument. simple right?
Related content
Comments: 582
G-manluver In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 20:42:24 +0000 UTC]
I was joking... May I ask is english your first language?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
G-manluver In reply to TuRnIPmOngEr [2008-03-31 20:49:08 +0000 UTC]
Because the way you phrase things is very confusing, like if you don't know how to write properly in English. No offense of course. Also you seem confused a bit about what I say throughout my own comments.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TuRnIPmOngEr In reply to G-manluver [2008-03-31 20:50:24 +0000 UTC]
i just suck at grammar XD and no offense taken
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to TuRnIPmOngEr [2008-03-31 20:51:22 +0000 UTC]
ah I see, I'm not great at it either but english isn't my first language xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pyonchitchi In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 00:40:34 +0000 UTC]
It would sure be a test of your poker face if you were doing that IRL, I don't think I could manage it with a straight face XD
Thumbsup on the sig, by the way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to pyonchitchi [2008-03-31 00:41:49 +0000 UTC]
thanks ^^. and yeah that would be quite a poker face practice indeed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rat2rrj In reply to G-manluver [2008-07-26 00:19:20 +0000 UTC]
i tried. and succeeded!!!!!!!!! against myself, though........
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MarieChan In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 00:31:30 +0000 UTC]
And furries are animals too
In their own little way c:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Draco-Digi In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 00:22:52 +0000 UTC]
damn you are so right. i've been trying to tell people this for ages but they come up with all the 'but we're smarter and we can invent stuff' crap just like you said.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to Draco-Digi [2008-03-31 00:32:34 +0000 UTC]
yeah, that's the only real argument they can use and its false by definition :/. Even today someone tried to convince me dictionary.com said that humans weren't animals yet almost every definition (except a really blunt one that would include plants and other life things being animals for some reason) said we were. Showing that this person had no idea we belong to the Animalia kingdom or are mammals xP
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GadgieCAT13 In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 00:16:19 +0000 UTC]
I love your stamp, and your rant makes me laugh at whoever you've been arguing with.
How are humans not animals?? I dont know how anyone could make an argument for that. What do they say we are then, if we're not animals? We're not plants...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to GadgieCAT13 [2008-03-31 00:29:29 +0000 UTC]
exactly, funny how when this person made the argument they said that "even mentally challenged people know humans aren't animals." yet other than uneducated Christians I've never really met too many people that argued with weren't animals.
And is this person saying you and I are less intelligent than someone with a under average IQ? sounds like an odd way to argue to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
GadgieCAT13 In reply to G-manluver [2008-03-31 03:28:38 +0000 UTC]
Quite odd
How can they say that about mentally challenged people? That's just mean...
I love your sig, by the way
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to GadgieCAT13 [2008-03-31 15:23:39 +0000 UTC]
thanks, and yeah they act like I'm dumb for using the proper definition of a word . And bringing mentally challenge people into the mix to try to disprove what I'm saying is wrong and nasty, if a mentally challenge person understood humans aren't animals is because uneducated assholes like this person told them that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
P-Ish In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 00:09:52 +0000 UTC]
I love this. And I completely agree. May I use this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to P-Ish [2008-03-31 00:12:29 +0000 UTC]
use it all ya want my dear . happy you agree.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DysopianFish In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 00:04:13 +0000 UTC]
Being a bacterium would be hella boring, too D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to DysopianFish [2008-03-31 00:06:23 +0000 UTC]
yes. lol, someone tried to prove me wrong by saying almost all definition left out humans, when I went to the link actually all but 1 say human weren't animals and that one said plants, fugi and bacterial were animals xD.
sorry dear I'm not stupid enough not to read things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DysopianFish In reply to G-manluver [2008-03-31 00:08:18 +0000 UTC]
This is where big biology textbooks come in handy. Not only to inform, but to smack the stupid out :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to DysopianFish [2008-03-31 00:12:04 +0000 UTC]
lol, yeah, I'm really tired of idiot religious folks trying to fight against being an animal. Really what's so wrong with it anyway?
Oh right, because the bible uses and outdated definition of animal we all have to bend over backwards and not be animals because of it . That's worse than people arguing about the misuse of the word "gay"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SumGui In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 00:02:10 +0000 UTC]
God, if I could I would put this up where I could.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
G-manluver In reply to SumGui [2008-03-31 00:06:41 +0000 UTC]
I wish you could do, spread the word!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |