HOME | DD

G-manluver — No more arguments about this

Published: 2008-03-30 23:57:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 14223; Favourites: 848; Downloads: 77
Redirect to original
Description please read this if you're going to even attempt to argue me
I'm fucking sick and tired of arguing this offline and on.

I don't give a shit what the "Bible" says, the Bible doesn't determine the meaning of the word animal.

GET THE HELL OVER IT!

Being an animal is based of biological properties, NOT BEHAVIOR, SPIRITUALITY OR INTELLIGENCE! In other words stop using the lame arguements: Humans have souls, cause wars, are smarter, have morals and any other bullshit related to our behavior.

THAT HAS NOTHING AND I REPEAT NOTHING TO DO WITH HUMANS BEING ANIMALS, DIMWIT!!!

Why can't you just look up what animal means instead of arguing using an outdated book?

Really would you argue that elephants aren't indangered because an outdated text says their population is fine? FUCK NO! So why argue the meaning of a word by using old text?

Meanings of words change over time, the definition of animal is one of those words and no amount of arguing with G-manluver will make your argument right.

You're wrong, humans are animals, you're wrong, too bad, so sad, use a dictionary, you're wrong!

The end!

PS: you can argue it here but again no amount of arguing will me with change the proper definition of animal . Just sit back, relax and live with the thought that you aren't a plant or fugi at the least!

EDIT: apparently my stamp is the most popular one of the day D:. wow this did much better than presumed.

EDIT 2: I said get over it! So GET OVER IT. your faith is incapable of changing known information so quit with the "God made us special" crap because if you can't prove it (meaning first you'd have to prove God exist, than get him to prove he created humans than get him to prove he made them into a unique seperate lifeform from all other species) than you have no argument. simple right?
Related content
Comments: 582

G-manluver In reply to ??? [2008-04-01 00:14:02 +0000 UTC]

no problem, I'm happy so many folks are enjoying this stamp :>

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kaze-Kuroki In reply to ??? [2008-04-01 00:04:10 +0000 UTC]

Its silly that anyone would wanna argue over the fact that we're animals. I guess people are so bored that they have to pick something and complain about it. Xp

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to Kaze-Kuroki [2008-04-01 00:11:07 +0000 UTC]

I think so too. Really this is in my top 3 arguments that are pointless people keep making with me and failing to prove me wrong xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaze-Kuroki In reply to G-manluver [2008-04-01 00:49:35 +0000 UTC]

Heehee! Keep it up. Don't let anyone bring you down! I'mma rooting for you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to Kaze-Kuroki [2008-04-01 17:17:21 +0000 UTC]

I'll try

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MoonlightEyesKitty In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 23:27:23 +0000 UTC]

aaaaamen

yeah, we're animals...
maybe "superior" animals as some people like to think(*cough*BS*cough*), but animals nonetheless

sooo... yay for this stamp!! I love eet!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to MoonlightEyesKitty [2008-03-31 23:37:04 +0000 UTC]

thanks ^^, happy you like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoonlightEyesKitty In reply to G-manluver [2008-04-01 01:08:53 +0000 UTC]

no problem! ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Koriko-dragoness In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 22:23:53 +0000 UTC]

I never realized that this was an issue, heh. But hey, I agree with you. It really shouldn't be a big deal imo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to Koriko-dragoness [2008-03-31 22:31:33 +0000 UTC]

I agree, really people should open up a dictionary or a encyclopedia when wanting to debate with me. I alway state my opinion when it is that, if I don't its because I'm saying scientific facts which aren't my opinion.

Which is always funny because they try to put it off as me being blindly stupid for arguing humans are animals. Because you know its stupid to use a dictionary to find out the meaning of a work right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wookieinmashoo In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 22:16:20 +0000 UTC]

great stamp
I really don't have as much a problem getting across that people are animals, it's the "insects are animals" that people don't understand. I think the more ignorant confuse the word animal and mammal -_-
Back to the stamp...I would use it if I could, but for now it gets a fav.
I wish I could be a protist; bacteria and fungi are so overated -_-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to wookieinmashoo [2008-03-31 22:17:57 +0000 UTC]

lol, thanks for the comment. Yeah I got that a few times about invertebrates not being animals

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wookieinmashoo In reply to G-manluver [2008-03-31 22:25:45 +0000 UTC]

ADD catching on here...got distracted by a movie and forgot to fave it -_-
You're welcome though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rat2rrj In reply to wookieinmashoo [2008-07-26 00:41:04 +0000 UTC]

its alive. alive=animal, as i see things.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rat2rrj In reply to Rat2rrj [2008-08-02 23:26:13 +0000 UTC]

except plants and minerals, EVERYTHING IS AN ANIMAL! that's that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlauShepherd In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 21:31:38 +0000 UTC]

fwaa I didn't think it was possible for humans to NOT know that... uh... WE are ANIMALS. seriously?

I mean. I remember when I was, what, five? I read in one of those children's encyclopedias what an 'animal' was, because I wanted to know technically, haha. I was all happy when I read that I too was an animal... which then led me to think I was part dog.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to BlauShepherd [2008-03-31 21:33:00 +0000 UTC]

xD I see. well I don't get why they try to so hard to convince me otherwise by using things that don't define what an animal is D:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aki-the-wolf In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 21:27:59 +0000 UTC]

I dont get what the big deal is, we ARE animals. What would the religious folks classify us as then? They need to get their facts straight.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to Aki-the-wolf [2008-03-31 21:30:58 +0000 UTC]

apparently they think were special non-animals for some reason D: I have no idea why there trying to class us as something else base on spirituality.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aki-the-wolf In reply to G-manluver [2008-03-31 21:32:34 +0000 UTC]

The only difference between us and animals is that we learned to speak and walk upright, and have opposable thumbs. We arent any more special then they are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to Aki-the-wolf [2008-03-31 21:34:10 +0000 UTC]

actually animals speak their own language and some animals have opposable thumbs, however your right about the upright stance. its only found in humans.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rat2rrj In reply to G-manluver [2008-07-26 00:39:44 +0000 UTC]

some can walk upright for a few minutes, but i know what you're talking about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to Rat2rrj [2008-07-26 19:15:43 +0000 UTC]

yeah, I was refering to all the time, there are other animals that can stand upright but nothing with the bodytype of a human.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rat2rrj In reply to G-manluver [2008-07-28 17:44:43 +0000 UTC]

i know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TuRnIPmOngEr In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 20:37:22 +0000 UTC]

i dont get it whats your views?are you saying humans are animals?

because i totally agry all though i do say humans are the better species of animals but i don agree

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to TuRnIPmOngEr [2008-03-31 20:38:12 +0000 UTC]

humans are a type of animal. that isn't my view its a fact .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TuRnIPmOngEr In reply to G-manluver [2008-03-31 20:47:07 +0000 UTC]

well yeah thats what i meant i agree

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to TuRnIPmOngEr [2008-03-31 20:47:54 +0000 UTC]

I see

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tinctorium In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 20:18:10 +0000 UTC]

But It was actually the animals themselves that started this argument! It was insulting that the human scum was lumped in with there kind. *nods* And I dun blame them! |D after all the shit we've caused

but seriously my philosophy is that Humans are animals but animals aren't humans.

And I'm gonna stick with it... cause it sounds clevah :B

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to tinctorium [2008-03-31 20:22:34 +0000 UTC]

well animals aren't humans other than humans themselves xD. Sorta like a cat is an animal but an animal isn't a cat.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

true-together In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 19:57:26 +0000 UTC]

Ha! People still argue about this these days? I guess sometimes ignorance is just want people want to believe and not what they don't know.

No one has answer my question about what these stamp things are for yet???

But anyways this will be my first stamp collected.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to true-together [2008-03-31 20:01:37 +0000 UTC]

thanks, the stamps are just for fun on DA, there for people with subscription to put the thumbnail in their journal, however with the add on of "collections" you now can make a stamp collection and no longer require really to have a sub.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

true-together In reply to G-manluver [2008-03-31 20:10:35 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the explanation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to true-together [2008-03-31 20:12:18 +0000 UTC]

no problem, I like helping answer questions as long as the people want to hear the answer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ItamiAssassian In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 19:10:07 +0000 UTC]

Oh thank goodness this stamp exists!

I am so sick of this arguement. XD

Into the box it goes!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to ItamiAssassian [2008-03-31 19:55:34 +0000 UTC]

yay :>

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Reecey-Boy In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 19:00:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! By Godwin's law some people are anthrocentric, arrogant twits.

It's like they think being catergorised as an animal makes them less human somehow, does being an animal make a dog less of a dog? Just because some ridiculously old and incoherent book panders to their self centered delusions of grandeur and overwhelming fear of their own mortality they think its acceptable to butcher language and everything else in the world according to its out-dated doctrines.

This needed to be said, thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

G-manluver In reply to Reecey-Boy [2008-03-31 19:57:57 +0000 UTC]

it had to be said by someone, I'm not going to say the bible is wrong, but the current version is so outdated and mistranslated no one could possibly tell me without sounding retarded that the bible is correct now Dx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zeldacultist In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 18:21:54 +0000 UTC]

Biologically, yes, yes we are. Same stuff as other animals. Funny how some people think otherwise. It is also true that humans have a much more advanced brain than animals, but we all have the same biological components as animals. I think that we might have additions that animals don't, like souls, but we're still pretty much animals all the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Rat2rrj In reply to zeldacultist [2008-07-26 00:36:47 +0000 UTC]

acctually, according to the alchemist (which i'm reading) everything on earth has a soul, be it mineral, animal, or vegitable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SummonerWolf In reply to Rat2rrj [2008-09-15 18:53:03 +0000 UTC]

While this is an old post, which perhaps I should leave to die, I feel the need to point out: the Alchemist is a fictional book.

Now, I agree with you in that I believe that everything has a soul (by one definition, that would be animism) I just wouldn't advise quoting a fictional book to back your belief up.

Although, depending where you stand, the Bible could also be considered a fictional book. I leave that as it is. x.X

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rat2rrj In reply to SummonerWolf [2008-09-15 19:19:44 +0000 UTC]

i know, and i do believe the bible is fictional. no didrespect, but it's my opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SummonerWolf In reply to Rat2rrj [2008-09-15 19:30:46 +0000 UTC]

Same here. I just thought I'd point out that fictional books are not generally good sources for 'facts'.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rat2rrj In reply to SummonerWolf [2008-09-15 23:39:49 +0000 UTC]

i know. i just wanted to think i impressed my history teacher.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

G-manluver In reply to zeldacultist [2008-03-31 18:34:30 +0000 UTC]

yeah that's my point, the word "animal" applies to biological traits, the ones that classify animals are found in humans so thus we are animals. We can argue humans have souls but that doesn't actually distinguish us from being classified as animals.

Human biological traits have us grouped with mammals and further down to primates and even further to homonidae.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TackBeckett In reply to ??? [2008-03-31 18:15:59 +0000 UTC]

I think it's fucking hilarious how arrogant human beings are when they believe that they alone think and feel, and that they are awarded some different set of rules and logic that are just too damn good to apply to the fuzzy four-legged animals of the world.

I hope that by the time the next species on this planet rises up to be the dominant one we're all dead and gone, because if not, we're going to be in for some torturous shit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Rat2rrj In reply to TackBeckett [2008-07-26 00:35:35 +0000 UTC]

having 4 paws is awesome! i wish i had them as a human sometimes...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TackBeckett In reply to Rat2rrj [2008-07-26 14:45:39 +0000 UTC]

It'd be neat wouldn't it? You could sure run a lot faster ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rat2rrj In reply to TackBeckett [2008-07-26 17:34:23 +0000 UTC]

woof!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

G-manluver In reply to TackBeckett [2008-03-31 18:18:12 +0000 UTC]

quite so, they don't even realize several species on the planet other than humans have society and rules. Look at Elephants and tell me for one fucking moment they aren't intelligent >:[.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>