HOME | DD

Published: 2013-09-09 18:04:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 11761; Favourites: 364; Downloads: 862
Redirect to original
Description
our home.stock from nasa
FB - www.facebook.com/pages/Gabrielβ¦
Related content
Comments: 65
Awesomely-Random In reply to ??? [2013-09-11 18:30:16 +0000 UTC]
Nevermind. Not important.
π: 0 β©: 0
GabrielGajdos In reply to ??? [2013-09-09 19:08:36 +0000 UTC]
there is possibility here is taken by a narrower visual angle, so it appears bigger
π: 0 β©: 1
Helge129 In reply to GabrielGajdos [2013-09-09 19:34:16 +0000 UTC]
The astronaut in the picture breaks that though. dailyman40.com/wp-content/uploβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
Helge129 In reply to GabrielGajdos [2013-09-09 20:24:01 +0000 UTC]
Because he would be proportionally bigger as well.
π: 0 β©: 1
Chromattix In reply to Helge129 [2013-09-10 00:00:17 +0000 UTC]
Unless he is a lot further away from the camera position than you would think. In a normal field of view (with the naked eye) he could be miniscule and barely even noticeable
It's how they get those photo's of sunsets in Africa, where the sun appears huge enough to completely encircle a tree or large animal which seems to be only a few feet away, when in reality, the sun appears barely bigger there than it would anywhere else, they just "zoom in" on the sun, and an animal or tree in front of it which is probably a few hundred feet away, but appears close in the photo
π: 0 β©: 1
Helge129 In reply to Chromattix [2013-09-10 10:24:00 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, good point, didn't think of that.
π: 0 β©: 0
GabrielGajdos In reply to ErikShoemaker [2013-09-09 18:53:36 +0000 UTC]
always a pleasure to hear you like it thank you
π: 0 β©: 0
Scorpidilion In reply to GabrielGajdos [2013-09-09 19:11:47 +0000 UTC]
do you have 1920x1200px wallaper version?
π: 0 β©: 1
GabrielGajdos In reply to Scorpidilion [2013-09-09 19:56:35 +0000 UTC]
have to dissapoint you, sorry
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev |