HOME | DD

GashibokA — Just different of class.

Published: 2013-09-02 09:46:39 +0000 UTC; Views: 73410; Favourites: 1369; Downloads: 548
Redirect to original
Description Marilyn Monroe parody.
Related content
Comments: 345

Dreamscape195 In reply to ??? [2013-09-05 20:18:41 +0000 UTC]

There are too many people like this in general I think the same can probably be said for any fandom, or hobby, or like, or dislike. I could say there are too many green-eyed people like this, or too many people in the Dr. Who fandom like this, and it wouldn't necessarily be untrue, but it doesn't make them related factors. There's no causation and hardly even a correlation. I mean, like most things there are probably exceptions, a few so completely obsessed that they truly do just stop life for their fandom, but it's not really fair to let the few individuals set the stereotype for the vast majority. Unless there really is science and study behind it, they don't seem relevant to one another in any way. 


tl;dr I still don't think the two are as related as some like to think

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to Dreamscape195 [2013-09-06 15:51:55 +0000 UTC]

There are too many people like this in general I think the same can probably be said for any fandom, or hobby, or like, or dislike

yeah but like I said there is an abnormally large amount in the brony community and just because these people are in other community too doesn't mean your community is excused.


 I could say there are too many green-eyed people like this

umm no you couldn't someone having green eye's is completely different then people who have no social life


or too many people in the Dr. Who fandom like this

again just because there are people in other fanbases like this doesn't mean your fan base is excused


but it doesn't make them related factors

but in this instance it does because there are an abnormal amount of people like that in this community, do you know how many people come up to me and tell me things like "you're right, I need to change" and such from this fanbase? the answer is alot more times in this fanbase then others and it's always the same symptoms as well, I tell them to go out and talk to people make some friends and there is always some BS reason why they can't like there are no people around where I live and such, I tell them to get a girlfriend/ boyfriend then they tell me something like well there is no one I remotely like and a lot of these people are in high school so firstly how is there no one around where you live and secondly you are telling me that in the entire school there is no one that you remotely express interest in? 


but it's not really fair to let the few individuals set the stereotype for the vast majority

well if that's the case and they are the few people then why do so many people comment back when I make clear cut definitions as to who I'm talking to? for example when I say something like social reject then why would you feel the need to reply if you aren't a social reject? because obviously you are not the person I'm referring to and talking to when I say socially rejected, like I've said almost a million times "don't be offended if you're not an offender" and the other one "the guilty always make themselves known"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dreamscape195 In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-06 19:30:32 +0000 UTC]

 doesn't mean your community is excused.

Never said otherwise, in fact, that was my point


someone having green eye's is completely different then people who have no social life

EXACTLY. And someone liking MLP is is completely different than people who have no social life. YET, there are green eyed people who like MLP, and green eyed people who have no social life, AND green eyed people who like MLP AND have no social life. My point was they're not necessarily related factors. 


just because there are people in other fanbases like this doesn't mean your fan base is excused

Again, I'm not saying it is. I'm just saying that you're zeroing in on one fanbase that happens to be the popular one at this point in time and acting as if it's the only one, while all others are excused. None of them should be excused.


for example when I say something like social reject then why would you feel the need to reply if you aren't a social reject? because obviously you are not the person I'm referring to and talking to when I say socially rejected, like I've said almost a million times "don't be offended if you're not an offender" and the other one "the guilty always make themselves known"


I say something because it's a lot like saying something generalized about the black community. A black person doesn't need to be a hoodlum to dislike people talking about how "so many blacks are hoodlums". Although that may not be the best example, since there's actually been studies done about that sort of thing and there are probably figures that can be pulled up to back on side or the other, unlike something like this in which personal experience is the only thing we have to go on. Either way, it's a stereotype like any other, and as a college student with many friends, a good number of which consider themselves bronies, I dislike that stereotype. In your case your personal experience says one thing, and my personal experience differs from yours. My friends, without exception, are all either in college or working. One of them is working and going through clinicals right now. The difference is, as you've said, the only people who usually reply to you are the guilty ones, who knows how many "bronies" have passed by your comments without saying anything, purely because they're not guilty? You have no way of knowing. Which means your experience is only with the few (and no matter how many "a lot" is, look at the millions out there) who are guilty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to Dreamscape195 [2013-09-06 22:26:57 +0000 UTC]

Never said otherwise, in fact, that was my point

so what was even the point in making that point if it was the same point I made? it's just a useless point.


Again, I'm not saying it is. I'm just saying that you're zeroing in on one fanbase that happens to be the popular one at this point in time and acting as if it's the only one

I zero in on this one? so you know every fanbase I've talked to? and you know for a fact that it' only this one that I go after?


None of them should be excused

what you seem to miss understand though is you think that I'm only going after this community which is untrue, like you said there are many people like this, so what if the reason I'm going after you right now is because you are my first option? what if I was going to be after other community's as well? (which I have) that would destroy your whole point.


I say something because it's a lot like saying something generalized about the black community

y'know you aren't the first person to bring up my race, more like the fifth.


A black person doesn't need to be a hoodlum to dislike people talking about how "so many blacks are hoodlums". Although that may not be the best example, 

no that was the worst example you could have used because being black and MLP don't even correlate, that is like trying to defend ice hockey by talking about why Chinese people are stereotyped you just can't do it and if that's what the rest of your comment is about then it's going to be broken logic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dreamscape195 In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-07 02:06:41 +0000 UTC]

So you go after multiple fanbases for things entirely unrelated to their fanbase - yet act as if that fanbase is a factor contributing to that unrelated thing as a reason to put down the people you're talking about (in this case the unemployed lazy slobs). You can hate lazy people, you can hate MLP, but you can't say with absolute scientifically backed proof that the two have ANYTHING to do with one another. It's the only point I've been trying to make this whole time. I don't care what fanbases you attack or why, I just dislike when someone uses a stareotype with no facts to back it as the entire basis of their argument. 


I didn't know your race, nor do I care what it is. I haven't even visited your page until just now, and you don't even have any pictures so how would I even know what your race IS? That was not the point. I was just picking an example. It's called a metaphor; they compare two very different things that are alike in how they function. Unlike a sport and a reason for stereotyping, two different forms of stereotyping are indeed related. The reason it "wasn't the best example" is because there have been studies to back the one involving the race of people who commit crimes - meaning even it has  more merit than what you've been saying. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CrimsonWonderland In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 19:41:28 +0000 UTC]

Yooooo... Who set fire to the fuse on your tampon? Jeez... I guess you've got nothing better to do than hate on mlp and be a troll, man... good luck with that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ApolloX12 In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 19:36:04 +0000 UTC]

Why would we be here in first place if we had social lives?

Checkmate, atheists

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverRattler In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 19:24:15 +0000 UTC]

etc*
etc*
a lot*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to SilverRattler [2013-09-03 19:26:26 +0000 UTC]

that's all you have to say? LOL guess you already know the truth then

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SilverRattler In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-03 19:48:46 +0000 UTC]

Read what Thelene said. They got it before you could.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thelene In reply to SilverRattler [2013-09-03 20:18:48 +0000 UTC]

8'DD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thelene In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-03 19:32:19 +0000 UTC]

Meh, we just won't find that comment worthy our reply.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

RekiKawahar In reply to Thelene [2013-09-03 23:01:33 +0000 UTC]

we? whose we? it's a one on one conversation lene, sorry but if you want to speak to me please wait in line

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thelene In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-04 10:18:16 +0000 UTC]

We do not accpet the impudent words spoke by a simple human being! *flies back to the moon*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to Thelene [2013-09-04 16:18:57 +0000 UTC]

there is no we, you are not a part of this conversation, not to mention this conversation was dead before you even commented

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thelene In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-04 17:46:11 +0000 UTC]

we do not care. (seriously, do i have to put a sign that stands 'Luna' or something for you to understand?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to Thelene [2013-09-04 19:49:30 +0000 UTC]

do I have to put a sign up that says "you are not a part of this conversation" for you to understand

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thelene In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-04 20:16:18 +0000 UTC]

do you think we will care about your tiny words? You said yourself, the conversation is dead. Let it end.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to Thelene [2013-09-04 20:44:35 +0000 UTC]

how can you talk about let it end when you are the person who made the first move?

hypocrisy at it's finest

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thelene In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-04 22:30:23 +0000 UTC]

But then you continued. Also, you made the first move by commenting stuff you knew would make a fuss. Also, you are a troll.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to Thelene [2013-09-05 14:56:43 +0000 UTC]

yeah I did make a comment but was that comment to you? was that comment about you? were you even apart of it? no, instead you decided to pick up on a already dead conversation and go from there so you made the first move not me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thelene In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-06 20:45:29 +0000 UTC]

Seriously. Well, by replying to my comments means that you won't simply give up until you have the last word. End of conversation. If you reply to this, it just shines through how you need to be in attention.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to Thelene [2013-09-06 22:28:45 +0000 UTC]

it just shines through how you need to be in attention.

attention? this is my comment

besides by commenting on a dead conversation trying to be involved in something that never involved you in the first place wouldn't that also be for attention?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thelene In reply to RekiKawahar [2013-09-07 18:59:50 +0000 UTC]

y u keep replying. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RekiKawahar In reply to Thelene [2013-09-07 20:10:23 +0000 UTC]

why do you keep replying?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverRattler In reply to Thelene [2013-09-03 19:48:18 +0000 UTC]

Exactly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xxtasxx In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 19:12:23 +0000 UTC]

This is the reason my sister is cuter than me lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jlun2 In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 19:08:32 +0000 UTC]

The narrator was later found dead next morning. Coincidence? You decide!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Syreth-Clan In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 18:49:17 +0000 UTC]

Why Fluttershy is voted best pony: It is simple, cute looks go with everything.

Cute look + Cute behavior = Cute
Cute look + Badass behaviour or extras = Cute lil' badass
Cute look + Scary or insane behaviour = Cute lil' psycho

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bond674 In reply to The-Syreth-Clan [2013-09-03 18:58:41 +0000 UTC]

hmm haven't this happened to me too?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverRattler In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 18:31:07 +0000 UTC]

Just an fyi, in the first panel, Fluttershy's dress doesn't have those straps/fabric going over her chest and shoulders. It looks like it's just a white skirt. But when you get to the part where she's trying to cover her no-no area, she's got fabric covering her chest area and that it wraps over the shoulders. Inconsistency?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TSForeverStrong In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 18:25:56 +0000 UTC]

I love R D's reaction!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rexlare In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 18:04:39 +0000 UTC]

Aw you made Fluttershy cry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlackIvoryy In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 17:43:37 +0000 UTC]

20 % cooler, nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AYUM23 In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 17:43:07 +0000 UTC]

They are always naked...


👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TechZeroPyro In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 17:42:05 +0000 UTC]

Awesome, I finally get a shot of Rainbow Dash's panties....

...wait a second...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

luckykitten29 In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 17:38:54 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ElLorenzana In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 16:51:44 +0000 UTC]

Ok, you're shitting in the memory of Marilyn Monroe...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

joshthecartoonguy In reply to ElLorenzana [2013-09-03 17:30:45 +0000 UTC]

Marilyn Monroe was the Miley Cyrus of her generation, so whatevs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

ElLorenzana In reply to joshthecartoonguy [2013-09-03 21:30:40 +0000 UTC]

You don't know what are you saying: Monroe never did twerking or fucked her dignity... ¬¬

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

joshthecartoonguy In reply to ElLorenzana [2013-09-04 02:14:54 +0000 UTC]

Monroe did about as much as you were allowed to do. We didn't get to the point where Miley Cyrus' type of performance became common place overnight. Monroe did that famous scene and shot photos for pin-up posters because "sex sells" was as much a principle of the holywood culture then as it is now. It's just now, when someone like Cyrus does something "edgy," most people just laugh because what used to be shocking has become boring. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zaparcik In reply to joshthecartoonguy [2013-09-03 19:43:13 +0000 UTC]

Dude, she at least showed some class.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverRattler In reply to joshthecartoonguy [2013-09-03 18:35:08 +0000 UTC]

Miley Cyrus is trash compared to Marilyn. You can't even compare the two.
It's like comparing a Collie with a Chinese Crested dog.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

coolclaytony In reply to SilverRattler [2013-09-03 19:42:47 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, a collie can't compete with a Crested! There too big, too hairy, and too annoying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverRattler In reply to coolclaytony [2013-09-03 19:51:13 +0000 UTC]

they're*

And did you ignore the entire point or are you just being a rude little fuck?
Either way, you're making yourself look like a jackass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

coolclaytony In reply to SilverRattler [2013-09-03 20:16:41 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I pretty much ignored the point. But here's the thing. I don't really give a shit about your Miley/Monroe debate, but I do give a shit that your trying to say that any one dog breed is inferior to the other.

 

But if you want rude, then here's a joke I could've used.

 

"Yeah one bitch is way cuter than the other."

 

Now THAT there is rude, my friend.

 

With that said, I leave you too either let it go and move on or get upset and try to start a fight that I will oblige you with. Goodbye.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilverRattler In reply to coolclaytony [2013-09-03 20:32:07 +0000 UTC]

I'm comparing looks, not value. Understand that.
Also, keep in mind that people intentionally breed dogs to have those traits to make them ugly as fuck.

I never requested rude, so that comment was moot.


Also...
 *you're*
*to*

Get bent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KhalFrodo In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 16:36:33 +0000 UTC]

I don't get it, but Fluttershy is sure cute!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverRattler In reply to ??? [2013-09-03 16:34:41 +0000 UTC]

Darn. All my votes for Rainbow Dash didn't help her win. xD

But Fluttershy's a good one I guess. Just as long as it's not Twilight Sparkle.

And What? Is this implying that Fluttershy is more ladylike than Rainbow Dash?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cZair In reply to SilverRattler [2013-09-03 16:44:34 +0000 UTC]

This is the funny thing though in just the fandom there are more RD fans than Fluttershy fans, but most of the RD fans don't do stuff like this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>