HOME | DD

Published: 2017-08-29 05:18:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 1669; Favourites: 59; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description
Photo taken at the McMinville Evergreen aviation and space museum in Northern Oregon. Photo taken by me, ask for permission to use.The Republic F-84F Thunderstreak was an American -built swept-wing turbojet fighter-bomber. While an evolutionary development of the straight-wing F-84 Thunderjet , the F-84F was a new design. The RF-84F Thunderflash was a photo reconnaissance version.
In 1949, a swept wing version of the F-84 was created with the hope of bringing performance to the level of the F-86 . The last production F-84E was fitted with a swept tail, a new wing with 38.5 degrees of leading edge sweep and 3.5 degrees of anhedral , and a J35-A-25 engine producing 5,300 pound-force (23.58 kN) of thrust . The aircraft was designated XF-96A. It flew on 3 June 1950 with Otto P. Haas at the controls. Although the airplane was capable of 602 knots (693 mph, 1,115 km/h), the performance gain over the F-84E was considered minor. Nonetheless, it was ordered into production in July 1950 as the F-84F Thunderstreak. The F-84 designation was retained because the fighter was expected to be a low-cost improvement of the straight-wing Thunderjet with over 55 percent commonality in tooling.
Role: Fighter-bomber /Reconnaissance aircraft
Manufacturer: Republic Aviation
First flight: June 3, 1950
Introduction: May 12, 1954
Retired: 1972 (US ANG), 1991 (Greece)
Primary users: United States Air Force ,Belgian Air Force ,German Air Force ,Royal Netherlands Air Force
Number built: 3,428
Unit cost: US$ 769,330 (F-84F)
Developed from: Republic F-84 Thunderjet
Variants: Republic XF-84H Thunderscreech
General characteristics
- Crew: 1
- Length: 43 ft 4¾ in (13.23 m)
- Wingspan : 33 ft 7¼ in (10.25 m)
- Height: 14 ft 4¾ in (4.39 m)
- Wing area: 325 ft² (30 m²)
- Empty weight : 13,830lb (5,200 kg)
- Loaded weight: lb (kg)
- Max. takeoff weight : 28,000 lb (12,701 kg)
- Powerplant : 1 × Wright J65-W-3 turbojet , 7,220 lbf (32.2 kN)
Performance
- Maximum speed : 695 mph (604 knots, 1,119 km/h, Mach .91) at sea level
- Range : 810 mi (704 nmi, 1,304 km) combat radius with two droptanks
- Service ceiling : 46,000 ft (14,000 m)
- Rate of climb : 8,200 ft/min (42 m/s)
- Wing loading : 86 lb/ft² (423 kg/m²)
Armament
- 6× .50 in (12.7 mm) Browning M3 machine guns,
- Up to 6,000lb (2,727 kg) of rockets and bombs, including one Mark 7 nuclear bomb
Avionics
- A-1CM or A-4 gunsight with APG-30 or MK-18 ranging radar
Communications Equipment
- AN/ARC-33 or 34 command set radio
- AN/APX-6 or 6A IFF set
- AN/AR-6 radio compass
- AN/APW-11 or 11A radar set
- AN/APN-21 TACAN set
Related content
Comments: 14
DouglasCastleman [2017-09-06 20:52:48 +0000 UTC]
You nailed the lighting on this one...so hard to do inside museums. Well done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GeneralTate In reply to DouglasCastleman [2017-09-07 00:50:09 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! When I have my camera and see an image opportunity I take it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sandhiyudha [2017-09-01 13:27:22 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful shot....the shiny fuselage....the light from above...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
3nlightend [2017-08-30 02:56:49 +0000 UTC]
Why is this on the fron g page of deviant? It's s photo someone too?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
3nlightend In reply to 3nlightend [2017-08-30 02:57:57 +0000 UTC]
Why is this on display? It's a photo someone took of a plane at a museum?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
phantomofmike [2017-08-30 02:56:45 +0000 UTC]
I like the yellow markings, they go so well with the silver of bare metal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
3nlightend [2017-08-30 02:55:25 +0000 UTC]
Where was this shot? It looks like the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum in Virginia. I was there a few weeks ago.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GeneralTate In reply to 3nlightend [2017-08-30 08:12:45 +0000 UTC]
I understand descriptions are so hard to read, I feel your pain!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
3nlightend In reply to GeneralTate [2017-08-30 11:56:53 +0000 UTC]
Aplogize, I was three sheets to the wind last night.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MviluUatusun [2017-08-29 09:16:45 +0000 UTC]
It was just too heavy for the engines of the day. If the engines had had just 1/2 the power of today's engines, it might have been a good partner to the F-86. Alas, if ifs and buts were candy and nuts. . . LOL.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0