HOME | DD
GIU3232 — TREX KILL SPINO
Published: 2012-01-30 22:16:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 17949; Favourites: 212; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
TREX KILL SPINORelated content
Comments: 138
And i don't think it ever will sadly
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's a shame. T.rex vs. Spino, Feathered designs vs. scaly designs, Hunter T.rex vs. scavenger T.rex, there's a lot of in-fighting in the dinossur fandom.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I’m sorry if I trigger any rex fanboys. I personally don’t like the spino either but It’s so Sad that Trex fan boys won’t stop whining about the jp3 fight when it was only a movie and it pisses them off so much it comes to the point they have to photoshop a Trex killing a spino cuz there is no where else to find a pic of the Trex winning. 😂😂😂😂😂😂 unless maybe
Primal carnage or just some dumbass fan art that they would get a copy right strike for uploading someone else’s art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
T-Rex fans forever and Spinosaurus fans are none of the ab
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No no T. rex gets WAY too much hype. It is time for the spino to shine and not be the one every one hates! ✊
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
T-Rex FTW!!! <333 Spino is literally overrated, it couldn't even survive a T-Rex attack...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
T-rex is fucking overrated
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Interesting coming from someone with T-Rex as their profile picture... xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Just because I like t-rex doesn't mean I can't say it isn't overrated
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wanna bet? It has one major trump over the Rex... a little thing called arms.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I do wanna bet! Those arms aren't gonna do a thing to the T-Rex other than delivering some minor flesh wounds, and the T-Rex would just need to deliver a single bone-crushing bite (having the most powerful bite force of any terrestrial animal with a pressure between 3-7 tons) to the Spino and it's all over! The Spino has nothing to actually challenge the T-Rex with... xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I’m pretty sure six, four to five inch claws will do more than a flesh wound and while the red has a stronger bite it might not land on the spino, it can bat away its head and retaliate with bites of its own, while its bite might not be as powerful its teeth are long enough to hit major arteries and since they are used to catching slippery fish I’m pretty sure rexy won’t be able to slip out of its grip. If it can control the Rexes brutish head it doesn’t have anything to worry about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm pretty sure it would not. I mean, come on, merely four to six inches? The T-Rex would laugh! Indeed, Spino's claws, jaws, and teeth are better adapted for holding prey (as you said, slippery fish) rather than crushing bones and armor as the jaws and teeth of T-Rex, and it could probably hold on to the T-Rex for a little while (whether or not it could hit major arteries I don't know, I'm doubtful, especially considering Spino is better adapted for catching and killing fish rather than other larger dinosaurs), but ultimately Spino's jaws aren't made for fighting and holding T-Rexes and T-Rex has got the brute strength and sheer size on its side so it might just toss the Spino around, pinning it down with its legs, and just go for a lethal bite anywhere on its body, with the fragile and large sail making it increasingly more difficult to move around and get back up. Furthermore, T-Rexes even engaged in vicious battles with each other, and preyed on the most dangerous beasts imaginable (i.e. Edmontosaurus, Triceratops, Ankylosaurus, Alamosaurus, and possibly even some unknown species of therizinosaurid, and whatnot), it was surely a very skilled predator and deadly fighter (especially considering it might have been very intelligent and had better eyesight than a hawk), just imagine what it would do to another theropod who has the guts to challenge it. T-Rex was essentially made to be the ultimate dinosaur killer. While Spino certainly does have some effective weapons, at least as far as catching fish and smaller prey goes, but if going up to a T-Rex they would largely be rendered "Meh!" essentially, as it would be far from what they were made for.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Listen, this is going nowhere so let’s just agree to disagree, their both badass but I just prefer the spino to the Rex
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
spino had actual arms, its larger ,willing to bet its brain is larger than a peanut, and meaner. this must be handicap soino(waiting for the butt hurt people from jp3 to respond ) and as response to the bit force comments i look at alligators who have an insane bit force basically looking at the snout i imagine a insane bite force to bite something under water effectively (refering to resistance from water). im putting all money on spino if this was to ever have happened (which it couldnt have)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rexy, the t rex in this picture, is a lot larger than the the juvenile in JP3, and even then he put up a fight. T rex did not have a small brain either, and was considered to be quite intelligent for a dinosaur.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
In real life, T. rex couldn't even bite Spino, which was in turn far too slow to catch a T. rex on land, making this an impossible match.
And no, Spino was not weak. When you eat things that weigh over two and a half tons (the size of fish it was eating), you can't be.
Spino is less like a heron and more like an underwater version of T. rex, because they were hunting the same-sized prey in different environments.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually, a T rex's bite is over 18,000 lbs, so it is able to snap a Spino's neck into two.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bite force is absolutely useless if you can't fit your opponent in you mouth.
T. rex would kill Spino if it bit it (the reverse would be true as well), but it cannot bite it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Why can't It bite it? Spinosaurus had a long head but it was relatively narrow. T. Rex wouldn't have a difficult time locking it's jaw on its muzzle. Spinosaurus also didn't have the most impressive legs for a theropod either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, like it would just sit there and let a T. rex make a full frontal assault.
What does its short legs have to do with this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A lot. Short legs on a large body usually results in low agility, and spinosaurus is an animal thought to be mostly aquatic. It's body is mostly suited for water. It's like comparing a sea lion to a tiger. Both are excellent predators in their respected environment, but putting them together is quite a mismatch.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, but that is not due to lack of strength as T. rex fanboys claim, but lack of mobility in one environment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Contrary to what people say below... a Spinosaurus didn't have the jaw strength to hold a Rex like in JPIII, not to mention, Spinosaurus jaws were adept at eating fish.
An adult Tyrannosaurus rex had a bite force of almost 12,800 pounds or 6.4 tons.
Also, T. rex and Spinosaurus did not live together. Spinosaurus lived in North Africa about 35 million years before T. rex terrorised the plains of North America.
In the Jurassic Park III fight, T. rex should have been the clear winner. She gets that vital neck bite in early and it would surely have been a mortal blow against Spinosaurus.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
The Rex fighting the spinosaurus was a boy and given that we have plenty of animals in the fossil record known to have survived attacks from tyrannosaurs I doubt it’s as cut and dry as most would imagine
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Maybe so, but it doesn't negate the fact that neither dinosaur lived in the same time and/or place. But given what we know about both species, T. rex has the jaw power to hold onto a Spinosaurus... What I like about both Jurassic World movies is we see T. rex in a more realistic fashion, as far as jaw power goes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No comment.
And T. rex couldn't bite anything larger than itself due to the jaw muscles required for its bite force.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It still would've been the victor against the Spino...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not a chance. T. rex wouldn't even be able to bite Spino.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I disagree. Tyrannosaurus would win at least 80% of the time in a fight with Spinosaurus.
Spinosaurus was not as strong or as smart as Tyrannosaurus. Tyrannosaurus had a larger brain and was smarter than Spinosaurus. Spinosaurus' teeth were conical and made for gripping slippery fish not for tearing flesh. To get close to Tyrannosaurus to claw, Spinosaurus would have to get past its powerful jaws and teeth. Spinosaurus also had eyes on the side of their head, limiting their vision. T. rex had binocular vision, so not only is the whole based on movement thing unfounded, it's impossible, since with binocular vision, we can see something even if it doesn't move, unless it's camouflaged. Tyrannosaurus' vision was six times better than a human's. Tyrannosaurus had more fighting skill because they hunted dangerous prey and had to fight with rival Tyrannosaurs.
Spinosaurus had to fight some theropods, like Carcharodontosaurus, but didn't have nearly as much fighting skill as Tyrannosaurus. Spinosaurus also had the spine on his back and that is fused to his backbone and if it got slammed into by Tyrannosaurus, it would break his backbone either paralyzing or killing him. These disadvantages of Spinosaurus weakened him in the battle.
Tyrannosaurus had a few disadvantages. He was a bit smaller than Spinosaurus. Tyrannosaurus also had smaller, weaker arms with smaller claws. Those are about the only disadvantages of Tyrannosaurus.
As I said, T. rex had a bite force of around 6.5 tons and had over sixty 8 inch teeth lining their 4 foot jaw. Using their bite force and teeth, Tyrannosaurus could easily tear off over 150 pounds of flesh.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Spinosaurus was at least as strong as Spino, I did point out the prey size was equal for both species. Brain size doesn't equal brainpower (birds have proportionately larger brains than humans, whales have proportionately tiny brains, look up their intelligence)
T. rex had good vision-so do all theropods. And all theropods have binocular vision to some degree; T. rex just has the most pronounced one. And binocular vision is a survival weapon, not a fighting weapon. I could say Spino had an advantage in this battle due to sensors in its snout, but that would be wrong, and so is your argument about vision.
T. rex hunted dangerous prey. So did Spino. A sawfish larger than a great white shark could have used its flexibility and weaponry to decapitate it, yet it preyed on such animals.
The "spine attached to backbone" thing is a myth. A fall could kill it, but this is simply due to huge size (and a fall like that would kill T. rex as well)
Bite force is absolutely useless for killingSpinosaurus. In fact it backfires. The amount of muscles needed to power the bite keep the jaw from opening wide enough to bite a Spino.
In short: all of your points are false or invalid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Here's the thing about brain-power. It's not just that T. rex had a larger brain; it's that it HAD to be smarter. First of all, it was a much more advanced theropod, evolving at a later date. Secondly, and more importantly, Tyrannosaurus had to be able to take down large armored prey, such as Triceratops and even Ankylosaurus. Even hadrosaurs like Anatosaurus were huge and would've been difficult to take down. It had to be powerful and intelligent enough to ambush and bring down such large prey. Spinosaurus, one the other hand, mainly hunted fish and crocodilians. It doesn't take much brain-power to do that. It didn't have to be smart because the niche it occupied didn't make that necessary. If Tyrannosaurus and Spinosaurus actually met they'd most likely ignore each other because they don't have to fight, they both occupy completely different niches. But, for the sake of an argument, say they did fight. It's almost definite, that Tyrannosaurus would win.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Evolving at a later date and hunting land-based prey != more advanced or smarter.
You are wrong Ina assuming T. Rex's lifesdayle requires more intelligence than Spino's. Fish and crocodilians are every bit as challenging to catch.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually, yes it does. Land-based prey such as large dinosaurs would be more difficult to bring down, so it would have to be more advanced than previous theropods, more intelligent, and more powerful.
I think bringing down a dinosaur just as big if not bigger than you is a bit harder than catching a fish or crocodile you're several times bigger than.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Do you know how big the fish Spino ate were? Around the same size as T. rex prey.
Also, land-based prey is NOT harder to bring down than aquatic prey. Seriously. Aquatic animals aren't weaker for their size compared to land animals. That's just prejudice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So Spinosaurus hunted fish around the size of elephants or larger?
I'm pretty sure a Triceratops is a little harder to bring down than perhaps a 20 foot fish.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
20 foot translates into one or two tons. That's anything but easy prey.
Not to mention that T. rex didn't hunt elephant-sized prey that often either (though it would have done so from time to time). It's not really that good at killing most prey larger and formidable than itself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Triceratops and Ankylosaurus could weigh up to 6 tons or heavier.
Oh? So it didn't hunt Triceratops or Anatosaurus very often, even though we have found bones of those animals with bite-marks made by tyrannosaurs. Then what did it hunt? Do you honestly think it'll sustain itself on Thescelosaurus on a basis? No. As far as I'm concerned, the juveniles would hunt smaller and quicker prey, being more agile and built for speed than an adult, but an adult, being much bulkier (albeit a bit slower), would hunt large prey such as Anatosaurus, Triceratops and even the occasional Ankylosaurus. Obviously they won't succeed every time and could very well be killed, but it's very obvious from its design that it was built for the purpose of taking down and combating large animals on a daily basis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And much of what Spino hunted was also a lot heavier than 2 tons. Mawsonia for example.
Triceratops and Anatosaurus aren't that big, except for the rare, fully-grown adults, and Ankylosaurus is actually quite small. So T. rex isn't going after prey significantly bigger than itself. That's what I meant by small prey.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I doubt Spinosaurus hunted 6-ton fish.
Triceratops can be bigger than an elephant. And those "rare, full-grown adults", T. rex was probably capable of taking on. I doubt they would do so regularly, as they'd probably prefer to go after smaller and weaker individuals (like any predator would, right?), but they could certainly bring down a fully grown Triceratops. They would never always succeed, but they certainly could. And they may not be bigger, but they're perfectly capable of killing it. When hunting such large prey, the risks of getting impaled, crippled or trampled are quite high, but Tyrannosaurus was in my opinion, the tiger or bear of its environment. It was a very large predator, the largest in its environment, and it was made to be capable of bringing down very large and powerful game that could easily kill it. Spinosaurus simply hunted crocodilians and large fish. That doesn't mean its prey were less deadly, but that Spinosaurus is at much less risk of being killed by a fish than T. rex is of being killed by a Triceratops. It was simply, by design, more equipped to bring down large game.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>