HOME | DD

GreatEastern1856 β€” Bash and Dash the Logging Twins

Published: 2013-07-15 11:38:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 3234; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 6
Redirect to original
Description What's this, I hear you shout, a tone of indignation and outrage apparent in your voices? Bash and Dash - not in their original form? Well, if you recall "HiT Characters - Good Buy or Bad Bargain? Part 2", I pointed out that there was no point in bringing a pair of 0-4-0 tank engines all the way over from the States, so instead I decided on using two of the North Eastern Railway's H Class (LNER Class Y7) as their prototypes. Their chasses come from a pair of L&Y Pug Class saddletank engines with the cylinders removed, but their bodyshells (originally intended to be the smaller K Class, or LNER Y8) were built entirely from scratch and painted in ex-LNER unlined black livery.

Following an accident with North Sodor Logging Company No. 8, the railway's second Shay, and the condemnation of its No. 7, an elderly Dunkirk vertical-boilered engine, the company bought a pair of Y7 tank engines to replace them on the lighter runs closer to the sawmills. The two engines, nicknamed Bash and Dash for their sprightly personalities (but not including that irritating trait of always finishing off each other's sentences), were built at Gateshead on the 30th of September 1891, and mostly worked at Tyne Dock, Northumberland, until the Great Depression brought about the contraction of dock work and prompted the LNER to sell them off in 1932. Although they were officially assigned the numbers of the engines they replaced, the North Sodor Logging Company's rather complacent attitude to repainting meant that they retained their LNER numbers throughout their working lives on the logging railway network. Following the closure of that system, they were reallocated to Tidmouth Harbour where they regained their original role as dock shunters.

One thing I need to point out though - don't even think of suspending Dash from a great height, or you'll scare the clinker out of him!
Related content
Comments: 19

migrannoche [2018-08-29 02:36:56 +0000 UTC]

What about Ferdinand?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NTSEFAN In reply to migrannoche [2019-03-02 08:06:47 +0000 UTC]

www.deviantart.com/greateaster…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MrSchienenzeppelin [2017-08-02 06:24:24 +0000 UTC]

A-at least it's better than the actually engines

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NTSEFAN [2015-08-08 23:40:05 +0000 UTC]

Actually, to talk about the Gypsy logging engines, there purpose was that they were used as yarding engines and they had geared winches with cable spools to winch and haul logs out of forests to the loading site to be loaded on flatcars. The gears could also power machines through a leather belt transmission. It can work three ways, either as a shunter, a winch, or a stationary steam generator. You can look here for more info: www.gearedsteam.com/other/bear…

Answer me this, would the engines that have 3 different purposes have 'no point' in being bought?

I hope this answers everything.


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GreatEastern1856 In reply to NTSEFAN [2015-08-09 09:41:03 +0000 UTC]

I suppose you do make a good case for such a design. All the same, if I wanted such engines on Sodor, I still would have had them built by a British manufacturer. The point of bringing two small tank engines all the way over from the States, in fairness, is that by the time they had landed on British shores, it would have been more convenient and cost-effective to have them built by, say, Bagnall, Hunslet or the Yorkshire Engine Company. With the geared logging engines, as I see it, it's a slightly different matter; they were built by specialist manufacturers like Lima and Heisler, and more importantly, their construction costs would most likely outweigh their shipping costs. Not that I don't agree with you on the Gypsy engines' usefulness; I'm just trying to look at it from a practical point of view.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NTSEFAN In reply to GreatEastern1856 [2015-08-09 09:52:41 +0000 UTC]

Ah I see. I understand. I just wanted to tell you why the Gypsy engines would be useful but unique to Sodor is all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FeatherWings78 [2015-08-01 17:53:50 +0000 UTC]

Nice workΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mechatrain150 [2014-07-31 16:28:06 +0000 UTC]

Actully ... they look better as britain locos

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TobyandMavisforever [2014-04-26 21:48:26 +0000 UTC]

Are their numbers real, or did you go in the same direction as Donald and Douglas?Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GreatEastern1856 In reply to TobyandMavisforever [2014-04-26 21:57:30 +0000 UTC]

Oh, their numbers are real alright.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TobyandMavisforever In reply to GreatEastern1856 [2014-04-26 22:08:05 +0000 UTC]

Cool.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Train48 [2013-07-15 18:38:24 +0000 UTC]

Like I said in your Ferdinand pic, you did a great job and have really done great work with your version of Bash and Dash.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GreatEastern1856 In reply to Train48 [2013-07-15 20:28:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I reckon the Y7s work wonders as a prototype for those two, and I'm glad to see others do too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Train48 In reply to GreatEastern1856 [2013-07-15 20:31:39 +0000 UTC]

Yes indeed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lightninging63 [2013-07-15 18:16:06 +0000 UTC]

I really like what you've done with these two. They've got proper British prototypes, which look kind of cute to me, and they have a proper back story to go with them. No 'Misty Island' or 'Old Wheezy', no wobbly bridge or underground tunnel. That's what I like.

My only trouble is telling them apart. Which one is Bash, and which is Dash?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GreatEastern1856 In reply to Lightninging63 [2013-07-15 20:25:36 +0000 UTC]

No. 518 is Bash, No. 519 is Dash. You can just about make out their numbers on their side tanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lightninging63 In reply to GreatEastern1856 [2013-07-16 20:39:11 +0000 UTC]

Ah I can see them. Thanks for clearing that up!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OkamiTakahashi [2013-07-15 17:09:39 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic, I love how you've taken those God-awful stereotypical idiot hillbilly engines and made them into proper British engines!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NTSEFAN In reply to OkamiTakahashi [2016-11-03 19:59:55 +0000 UTC]

What's wrong with the gypsy engines they're based on? Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0