HOME | DD

grezar β€” Timaeus the Knight of Destiny

#destiny #knight #timaeus
Published: 2015-05-08 00:30:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 14404; Favourites: 111; Downloads: 140
Redirect to original
Description Β© of Konami and Kazuki Takahashi.

Timaeus the Knight of DestinyΒ  (LIGHT)
Level: 10
[Warrior/Fusion/Effect]
Lore: "Legendary Knight Timaeus" + "Legendary Knight Critias" + "Legendary Knight Hermos"
Must be Special Summoned (from your Extra Deck) by sending the above cards you control to the Graveyard, and cannot be Special Summoned by other ways. (You do not use "Polymerization".) This card is unaffected by other cards' effects. Once per battle, if this card attacks or is attacked, during damage calculation (in either player's turn): You can make this card's ATK and DEF become equal to the ATK of the monster on the field with the highest ATK (your choice, if tied). When this card is destroyed by battle: You can Special Summon 3 "Legendary Knight" monsters from your hand, Deck, and/or Graveyard, ignoring their Summoning conditions.
ATK: ? DEF: ?
Related content
Comments: 22

ksuniverse [2019-12-20 05:49:31 +0000 UTC]

this fusion monster looks very amazing.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

kacript [2015-07-24 00:01:12 +0000 UTC]

Just having the dragons and their legendary knight forms finally available for real is great enough, but I was truly amazed that they even made the Knight of Destiny as well!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to kacript [2015-07-24 02:47:00 +0000 UTC]

So true! *0*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OriginofDarkness [2015-07-19 18:42:24 +0000 UTC]

Here's the million dollar question for ya: Is there a way to get around a Defense Position Knight of Destiny?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to OriginofDarkness [2015-07-19 19:58:51 +0000 UTC]

Ss it in defense position or just protect it from any attack and during your next turn, switch it to Defense Position.
Too obvious?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OriginofDarkness In reply to grezar [2015-07-19 20:02:46 +0000 UTC]

No I mean, yourself, are in the face of Defense Position KoD, going against it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to OriginofDarkness [2015-07-19 20:16:06 +0000 UTC]

It's once per battle. I think that Honest/Kalut can surpass this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OriginofDarkness In reply to grezar [2015-07-19 20:20:19 +0000 UTC]

Unfortunately it does not. There are some really complex rulings with it. I can double check cause I know them because of it vs Moon Mirror Shield, but not 100% sure on Honest and Kalut.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to OriginofDarkness [2015-07-19 20:37:35 +0000 UTC]

Well then...
What about a Special Summon during the battle phase after the first atk?
Idk, Emergency tuning?
Knight of Destiny will copy the highest atk, but then you'll summon an more powerful monster who will destroy him.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OriginofDarkness In reply to grezar [2015-07-19 20:40:43 +0000 UTC]

Those cause replays though, which will make KoD's ATK reset

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to OriginofDarkness [2015-07-19 20:53:45 +0000 UTC]

WTF? ><

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OriginofDarkness In reply to grezar [2015-07-19 21:36:43 +0000 UTC]

Hence million dollar

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to OriginofDarkness [2015-07-20 04:45:58 +0000 UTC]

Must try something on YGOPro...
This card can't be this OP.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OriginofDarkness In reply to grezar [2015-07-20 05:22:53 +0000 UTC]

Of course not. It's way too troublesome to get out

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to OriginofDarkness [2015-07-20 05:36:02 +0000 UTC]

I'm starting to think that u have the solution, but you're having so much fun manipulating me like this...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OriginofDarkness In reply to grezar [2015-07-20 12:12:26 +0000 UTC]

I wish man! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to OriginofDarkness [2015-07-20 19:38:53 +0000 UTC]

Any Ideas?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

OriginofDarkness In reply to grezar [2015-07-21 17:03:10 +0000 UTC]

None mate. GG

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vekarvonkostu [2015-07-18 21:07:58 +0000 UTC]

So Awesome!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Db660 [2015-05-08 14:18:42 +0000 UTC]

Please, Mirror Force Dragon, Doom Virus Dragon and Tyrant Dragon

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

grezar In reply to Db660 [2015-05-09 16:18:45 +0000 UTC]

made

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mete122 [2015-05-08 12:20:27 +0000 UTC]

still cant believe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0