HOME | DD

HalTenny — Library Complex

Published: 2016-05-16 12:00:39 +0000 UTC; Views: 2281; Favourites: 86; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I have a few more new images based on the style of "Resistance To Architectural Conformity"   

Most are somewhat less chaotic, 'normal' shaped buildings, or maybe less alien in nature. The surrounding area is still odd due to the characteristics of the _invcylindrical formula which when used can sometimes be difficult to achieve a smooth, flat ground or landscape surface while still giving the rounded, grouped together structures.
Related content
Comments: 22

nlarsen619 [2017-08-07 05:38:14 +0000 UTC]

Dope! Does boxtiling give you the boxy window shapes? Im still learning all the Ads. There is soo much. I wish there was a referance to all the formulas somewhere. Another question....if you feel inclined to answer...does the order of the formula slots matter? Ex...if I put a 3d fractal formula in the first slot, a _transform in the second slot, then a different fractal 3d in the 3rd...does the _transform effect them both?
 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to nlarsen619 [2017-08-07 13:26:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Boxtiling is not used in these parameters. It's difficult to say exactly how the windows are formed because all 6 formula slots are used. So it's a combination of formulas that worked together to do this. But the  formulas, AmazingBox and SierpHilbert are the main shaping formulas and probably SierpHilbert is responsible mostly for the windows. The placement of the formulas do matter, but that's not to say you can't break the rules. I put an 'add' formula (transform) where ever I want even though they are intended to be used as a 'pre' transform. So they may very well work better when placed before a 'shape' formula, but that's not to say they will not affect the image if placed after the shape formula. I'm not a very good one to ask technical questions because I don't care about 'rules'. I just do what I do, and if it works, it works. Probably a good many of my images break that rule where the transform should come first. Having said that, at leas while learning, it would probably be better to use the 'transform' as intended for more robust and repeatable results. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nlarsen619 In reply to HalTenny [2017-08-07 16:26:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I get that. I dont think anyone really knows, except for maybe Jesse and the original creators. Actually I know nothing about mb3ds conception, but I think thats right. You might not know technically what you are doing but you know HOW to do it......at the the end of the day thats really all that matters. And creativity of course, which is something you can not buy or trade and you are fortunately versed in that dept. Searching and creating fractals for me is like crack. I do enjoy exploring other peoples parameters, but nothing beats starting from nothing and discovering a gem after a few hours of wading through the fractal bog. Plus I know there must be other golden formula combos not yet discovered....like your recip/siny/pinski dish. Sometimes I miss meals....its bad. Anyways, as always...thank you kindly for taking the time to answer my awkwardly noobish questions.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BillyNikoll [2016-05-23 11:54:40 +0000 UTC]

!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to BillyNikoll [2016-05-23 12:25:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BillyNikoll In reply to HalTenny [2016-05-23 12:57:16 +0000 UTC]

Welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sunken-nautilus [2016-05-21 02:21:34 +0000 UTC]

Amazing art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to Sunken-nautilus [2016-05-21 11:27:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sunken-nautilus In reply to HalTenny [2016-05-22 03:46:54 +0000 UTC]

Welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dark-beam [2016-05-18 16:01:43 +0000 UTC]

wonderful Hal

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to dark-beam [2016-05-18 20:51:55 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mhoonruk [2016-05-18 14:16:58 +0000 UTC]

But nevertheless they are cool buildings

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to mhoonruk [2016-05-18 20:52:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

black3825 [2016-05-16 19:48:14 +0000 UTC]

Looks lovely. Would most certainly not mind to live in a city/area looking like this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to black3825 [2016-05-16 20:34:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

marijeberting [2016-05-16 18:13:34 +0000 UTC]

Awesome 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to marijeberting [2016-05-16 19:28:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marijeberting In reply to HalTenny [2016-05-16 20:30:11 +0000 UTC]

you're very welcome Hal

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sbcpetew [2016-05-16 17:39:56 +0000 UTC]

This is wonderful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to sbcpetew [2016-05-16 19:28:00 +0000 UTC]

Many thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kuzy62 [2016-05-16 12:55:26 +0000 UTC]

Great image....and perfect title!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HalTenny In reply to kuzy62 [2016-05-16 19:27:47 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0