HOME | DD

HTML-LORD — M2 Hypersonic Bomber by-nc-sa

Published: 2009-09-27 18:05:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 1193; Favourites: 4; Downloads: 97
Redirect to original
Description This is the M2 Hypersonic Bomber(Nicknamed Aura, after the hypothesised American Aurora plane.)

The Aura is the result of a failed attempt to make a fighter that couldn't be shot down. It was deemed a failure after it was made clear that it flew faster than any bullet it could fire and flew past its targets before it could get a lock. But when it was suggested it could be used as a bomber or a recon plane it was a instant succes, even though hitting the right targets stays a problem because locking on can only be achieved by external guidance(GPS, Infantry with target designators). And its extreme speeds/altitude makes taking clear picures near imposible.

It is powered by 4 Hydrogen-fueled SCRAMJET engines(Which can also be injected by on-board LOX, increasing the service ceiling) and can't lift off on its own and needs RATO's or a combination of RATO's and a drop from a High-altitude bomber or similar to gain enough speed(Mach 2.5~3) for the SCRAMJETS to be cabable of taking the propulsion over. It can carry a single 1500 kg bomb or missile between the engines and can release them at hypersonic velocities. Because of its high speed it is completely invulnerable to AA missiles and most AA shells, the only exception being a head-on barrage while it is ground-hugging. It is though capable of withstanding AA lasers because of the reflective surface but can still be rendered useless by EMP or other WMD's.

Minimum Takeoff Speed(Maximum Load): Mach 2.5
Cruising Speed: Mach 6
Maximum speed: Mach 7.9
Cruising Altitude: 10 km
Range(Maximum load): 12.500 km
Service Ceiling: 17.000 m(Normal engine), 45.000 m(with LOX being injected)
Powerplant: 4xM7 Hydrogen/Hydrogen+LOX SCRAMJET
Related content
Comments: 83

HTML-LORD In reply to ??? [2009-09-28 15:54:14 +0000 UTC]

Its white because it can reflect heat better that way, because at those speeds you can weld steel together

Yep, the shockwaves caused by the craft do more damage than the weapons, but if you want to destroy heavy fortivications with it you can get fucked because it needs to fly low and one wrong move and you crash, which doesn't leave anything of you.

And when engine trouble occurs the plane uses its momentum to gain altitude and glide towards a safe landing zone.(and at mach 7 or so you can glide fucking far, even with the wind-resistance.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-28 17:52:45 +0000 UTC]

Right, I meant that. But as my brother said, White on a white back ground doesn't leave much to the eyes and lots to the imagination.

I'm not trusting myself to this craft either, I don't have a death wish. At least, you can destroy cities with it and shatter windows, though how much of that is an advantage, I don't know. Fortifications? I would be mental to even ASSIGN this jet to go break any.

For Mach 7-8 Speeds, you need to be like HIGH in the sky. Unless the craft is a feather, It's going to come plummeting down, speed or no speed. But yeah, it can go far. But I guess something with this light a chassis would end up with major damage with a rough landing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-28 17:56:33 +0000 UTC]

White background shucks, I know.

Yep, it powerfull, but only adrendaline-junkies fly it.

Its designed to land by deploying parachutes from different points along the chassis(wheels would have compromised the integrity of the chassis).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-28 18:02:41 +0000 UTC]

Then why do you use the white?

Nice. It's good to know more crazy people exist in this world.

Parachutes aren't much help in real battle now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-28 18:08:35 +0000 UTC]

The backround can't be changed color, unless I use paint for it

Parachutes are usefull because its not designed to land anywhere NEAR the battlefield.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-28 18:14:02 +0000 UTC]

Like the battlefield is only one km wide.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-28 19:55:48 +0000 UTC]

Nah, Artilery is included, so its about 30~80 kilometers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-29 05:09:44 +0000 UTC]

It might be a risky gamble to even send this thing there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-29 14:23:44 +0000 UTC]

Its not war if there is no risk involved.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-29 15:05:36 +0000 UTC]

Well, I do think we all try to minimise casualty.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-29 15:12:44 +0000 UTC]

And that is so with this, for a pilot who knows how to fly anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-29 15:13:48 +0000 UTC]

Ever tried to build a fighter?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-29 15:24:04 +0000 UTC]

Yep, but thats more difficult because it needs to be very nimble.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-29 15:26:48 +0000 UTC]

Hm , yeah. Also, I keep looking for the pointed tip on the jets, and thus, am left undecided about the whole lot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-29 15:36:04 +0000 UTC]

That is actualy easily solvable with lego.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-29 15:36:31 +0000 UTC]

You've so got to build one to show me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-30 12:03:33 +0000 UTC]

Maybe I will, I am still trying to build a fighter from scratch.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-30 13:38:17 +0000 UTC]

And no success?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-30 14:40:30 +0000 UTC]

Very limited, It still needs much more tinkering.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-30 17:34:00 +0000 UTC]

At least, I'm willing to wait. Make it some other colour than white, tho.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-30 17:36:59 +0000 UTC]

Yea, its probably gonna be grey or stealth-black

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-30 17:54:15 +0000 UTC]

OOOH. I'm so going to wait for it. Can it please have blue stripes on it if it's black?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-30 17:57:07 +0000 UTC]

Its not stealth, but maybe its good for the airshow version of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-30 18:23:48 +0000 UTC]

I'm confused.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-30 18:28:41 +0000 UTC]

If I make a stealth version of the plane, it needs to be completely black, but that won't look cool when it is used for airshows, so black/blue will probably look good for it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-30 18:41:12 +0000 UTC]

I can't believe I'm suggesting colours to you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-30 18:44:33 +0000 UTC]

You need to do something anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-09-30 18:49:14 +0000 UTC]

Fantastic power of suggestion! I feel so wanted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-09-30 18:53:40 +0000 UTC]

Like "Most Wanted"?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-01 01:26:29 +0000 UTC]

That was LAME.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-01 14:18:55 +0000 UTC]

Both the joke and the game?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-01 17:51:20 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, both. Most wanted. I thought you could come up with something better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-02 15:31:12 +0000 UTC]

I can, but that takes effort, effort better spend on driving a unarmoured truck with a nuke in the back into an allied base

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-02 18:42:14 +0000 UTC]

Can you please destroy the ministerial building in my city? There are quite a few losers I want to kill.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-04 18:43:23 +0000 UTC]

As soon as I perfect the analog missile guidance computer I am designing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-05 13:03:18 +0000 UTC]

Hm...I'm waiting anyway...It's not like that compy exists anyway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-05 15:10:42 +0000 UTC]

I just need to perfect it, it works in theory

And because its analog its resistant to EMP

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-06 06:14:01 +0000 UTC]

EMP? (I'm sort of shut down today, because of cramming for stupid practicals.)
You know, in theory Newton also had an atom bomb thrown on his head instead of an apple, so he couldn't hand us gravity. But in reality it was still an apple.
(I hate his laws.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-06 17:23:59 +0000 UTC]

ElectroMagnetic Pulse

Everything is an atom bomb, as long as it explodes

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-07 08:48:21 +0000 UTC]

I like Hydrogen bombs more. The Fusion process is intriguing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-07 12:12:55 +0000 UTC]

I like neutron bombs the best, you can kill an entire city, and within a week you can start to live there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-07 12:21:16 +0000 UTC]

That is, if you aren't stupid enough to broadcast, "Hi, I fropped the bomb!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-07 12:36:27 +0000 UTC]

Probably, and you also shouldn't forget to arm and detonate it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-07 12:39:06 +0000 UTC]

Well, you need to be one idiot to drop a neutron bomb and not detonate it. It would do no good. No one would die...either.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-07 12:46:53 +0000 UTC]

Maybe if the bomb falls on someone's head and crushes his skull

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-07 12:58:03 +0000 UTC]

That's a nice way of looking at it, but the general fallout would be that the plan failed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-07 13:06:28 +0000 UTC]

Pretty much, and the enemy got some expensive technology.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-07 13:33:14 +0000 UTC]

Then why decimate a city? Try killing the equipment yard.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HTML-LORD In reply to AeraeElae [2009-10-07 15:37:01 +0000 UTC]

Or just leveling the whole area with fuel-air bombs

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AeraeElae In reply to HTML-LORD [2009-10-08 06:29:32 +0000 UTC]

The bombs! How about we blow the defence sector up?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>