HOME | DD

ArrogantVengeance In reply to Metalchick36 [2017-08-17 01:36:43 +0000 UTC]

Well...that's because Megatron probably sees Starscream as his property (or as most fangirls would term it...his BITCH). But Starscream keeps proving otherwise

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Humblebot In reply to EnvySkort [2010-10-24 19:46:59 +0000 UTC]

HI HOW ARE YOU :3

GOOD. It's a nice couple.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

flutterjet In reply to deezaster82 [2009-11-06 16:43:39 +0000 UTC]

I don't see why you couldn't have worded your comment differently~ how about you stop subtly trying to criticize pairs/promote other pairs and learn to either not comment about that issue, or comment on the picture itself, period? Nobody cares about which pairing you would have preferred, and it's kind of disrespectful to point it out, too. Have a lovely day <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

deezaster82 In reply to flutterjet [2009-11-06 17:54:55 +0000 UTC]

Cool down, dear! I don't see anything disrespectful in my comment. But if you rather like me to lie, ok.

Oh I loooooove that pairing!!!!! So Kamwaiiiii

Here you have! Have a good day too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flutterjet In reply to deezaster82 [2009-11-06 18:40:56 +0000 UTC]

Nope, that's just as unnecessary as pointing out you don't like it~
That is to say, nobody cares. But you'll realize that saying you'd have preferred something else is inherently criticizing, and with no basis other than personal preference. As such, it's not constructive.
Consider your words a little better before posting next time and that'll avoid any possible misunderstanding. :>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

deezaster82 In reply to flutterjet [2009-11-06 19:30:40 +0000 UTC]

You didn't like my comment, I get it.
I admit the fault is mine first hand: I thought you were open minded.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flutterjet In reply to deezaster82 [2009-11-06 20:59:34 +0000 UTC]

You are being defensive, I get it.
I admit it's first of all my fault for thinking that, by pointing out that you have been displaying this attitude in different comments on different sites, you could actually accept the criticism good naturedly and use it as means of improvement. Instead, you're passive-aggressively attacking me. :/
As a side note, if I were you, before giving someone a lesson of open-mindedness I'd reflect on my own, especially if it's been made extremely obvious that I can't seem to miss a chance to bash other pairs~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

deezaster82 In reply to flutterjet [2009-11-06 22:36:11 +0000 UTC]

Wait a minute, hold on here...I never said that! You must have mistaken me for someone else. I'm not that active on other sites that you can have remembered me. I bet you didn't even know me before today!

bha this is all too bad, realy. Because I like your art but you seem to take it all too much at heart. Do you even realise that I never attacked you in any way? That my first comment was only meant to share my point of view with you?
I will no longuer argue with you over a thing that had no substance!

Keep on with the nice art, though, that's realy all I've to say to you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flutterjet In reply to deezaster82 [2009-11-06 22:55:58 +0000 UTC]

First of all, maybe you're mistaking me for , while I'm just a friend. Keep that one straight, I wouldn't want you to dislike her because I am pointing out unpleasant facts to you~

But that aside, I do know you from other sites, and what I'm saying is supported by honest evidence. The first example that comes to mind on top of my head is your comment to this: [link]
So, as you can see, this is not a one-time-thing. You seem to reply the same way, as in, sharing your point of view (that is disapproving of the pair) every time certain things are brought up, regardless of the site~ and that's an objective observation.

The praise to the art was accompanied by a judgement on the content, and that is what you could have avoided. Hope everything is clear now. :>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

deezaster82 In reply to flutterjet [2009-11-06 23:09:23 +0000 UTC]

Know that I don't dislike you (or Humblebot for that matter)
I am just sad that it came to this: you, bringing evidence that I'm exclusive and pairing basher. You've made your point very clear.
We can't understand each other.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flutterjet In reply to deezaster82 [2009-11-06 23:52:47 +0000 UTC]

What's there to understand? I'm pointing out something and giving you evidence so that, if you wanted, this attitude could be changed for better interaction and dialogue in the future (no matter who's involved). You can acknowledge my point or reject it, but I don't think there's anything else to explain. Isn't that right? :>

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

deezaster82 In reply to flutterjet [2009-11-07 00:03:08 +0000 UTC]

Alright.
We should maybe stop now, we're spamming Humblebot's comment page.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flutterjet In reply to deezaster82 [2009-11-07 00:50:44 +0000 UTC]

Sure, okay. I'm pretty sure she didn't mind the discussion~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0