HOME | DD

Published: 2008-01-15 02:46:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 8508; Favourites: 89; Downloads: 107
Redirect to original
Description
January 11th, 2008
From the N.E.L.A. FFF™ New Designers' Fashion Show
Model: Mike U.
Fashion Designer: Leatherwright
This weekend, I was one of the photographers for the New Designers' Fashion Show, at the N.E.L.A. Fetish Fair. It was a very different experience for me, mostly because of the pace that we worked at. These photos are from very quick (<2 minute) shoots with each model, to get a record of each design before they went on the catwalk.
UPDATE Feb 10th, 2009 Oh god! Believe me when I say this was totally, completely unexpected! This image (practically a snapshot at the time) was chosen for my third Daily Deviation.
For more of my favourite works, check out This Collection: "For Your Consideration" .
For some of my best recent works, check out This Collection: "Recent Best" .
Thanks to everyone!
Related content
Comments: 90
theadacat In reply to ??? [2009-02-10 20:06:04 +0000 UTC]
The subject of a piece doesn't need to be beautiful for the piece itself to be beautiful. Not to mention, not all art is about beauty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IanStruckhoff In reply to ??? [2009-02-10 16:45:35 +0000 UTC]
This photograph wasn't of a beautiful subject, exactly-- but it shouldn't be expected to just be beautiful, as it isn't a glamour photograph.
I welcome constructive criticism. However, one-word negative comments have no place on DeviantArt. If you have something to say, say it constructively and politely.
I should also say... The fact that this photo is "ugly" is why I think it is beautiful. It's a real person, being very brave at a fashion show, in terms of expressing himself publicly. It's also a reminder that sex, fetishes, and attraction aren't the exclusive domain of "beautiful" people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Crystal-LJ In reply to IanStruckhoff [2009-02-11 04:58:32 +0000 UTC]
Critics are all over and they think what they want to think. Yet, it would have been a better thing to be more constructive with just "ugly" as the word, such as explaining why the picture is ugly. I agree with you on the constructive part.
He may not be conventional beautiful, but doesn't mean the person can't model for photographs and such. Doesn't have to be some shoot of Carmen Electra.
And also, I like this shot. I like the setting for it, even if it is more of a snapshot. It also shows good detail of the face.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pixelkoenig In reply to IanStruckhoff [2009-02-10 19:28:53 +0000 UTC]
the man is not very beaatifull
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to candy-floss22 [2009-02-10 15:03:04 +0000 UTC]
I think I know why... First, most people who view "mature content" are looking for pretty girls. Second, most people who don't view "mature content" will never see it. That doesn't leave a very wide audience-- which I imagine is why it was featured, to give Fetish Guys some more exposure.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
candy-floss22 [2009-02-10 15:00:16 +0000 UTC]
Congrats on the DD, perhaps one day i'll finally get one too! lol
I love this shot it's so refreshing and makes a change from all the common fetish shots and naked girls I see on here from day to day.
Excellent work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ILTBY In reply to ??? [2009-02-10 13:50:24 +0000 UTC]
Not your classic fetish model, but a great shot nonetheless!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to ILTBY [2009-02-10 14:27:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I suspect the reason I liked it originally, and others like it now, is because he's exactly the opposite of what you expect to see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ILTBY In reply to IanStruckhoff [2009-02-10 14:35:59 +0000 UTC]
Definitely! It's quite refreshing
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
onegemini In reply to ??? [2009-02-10 13:40:45 +0000 UTC]
Congrats again, sir.
So now I need two more to catch up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to onegemini [2009-02-10 14:28:01 +0000 UTC]
It should get easier and easier to catch up... not a lot of people get a fourth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
onegemini In reply to IanStruckhoff [2009-02-10 15:54:34 +0000 UTC]
In my categories, not many people get a second.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to onegemini [2009-02-10 15:56:06 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, one thing working for me is probably that there are a lot of photography galleries that my images fit in. (And in the case of this one, not a lot of Male Fetish photos to choose from.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
onegemini In reply to IanStruckhoff [2009-02-10 16:00:26 +0000 UTC]
Good point.
Though, quite honestly, I haven't done anything DD worthy in a while. I'll get to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to onegemini [2009-02-10 16:00:58 +0000 UTC]
You have some great work here!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bumba-meu-boi In reply to ??? [2009-02-10 12:22:17 +0000 UTC]
I like this one!
(my english sucks)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to bumba-meu-boi [2009-02-10 12:30:36 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! (You wrote that fine, by the way.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sethiaz In reply to ??? [2009-02-10 10:24:17 +0000 UTC]
Awesome shot! For some reason, I really like this one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to Sethiaz [2009-02-10 12:31:06 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! (A few people noticed it today, is it featured somewhere? heh)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanStruckhoff In reply to Sethiaz [2009-02-10 12:49:58 +0000 UTC]
I realized after I commented. I hadn't checked them yet, and never considered the possibility that that image would get one. Definitely a surprise to wake up to! heheh
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IanStruckhoff In reply to TerrorCookie [2009-02-10 12:31:18 +0000 UTC]
hahaha. Not the way he's dressed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TerrorCookie In reply to IanStruckhoff [2009-02-16 09:57:59 +0000 UTC]
Well, no, not that of course, but his face bears a scary resemblance!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kirsten-18 In reply to ??? [2008-01-15 08:15:15 +0000 UTC]
i love this series of shoots. they're quirky, and somehow honest. great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1