HOME | DD
IgorKutuzov β Gelgoog MLP-N
Published: 2010-10-05 19:24:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 1955; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 56
Redirect to original
Description
A customized Geelgoog created to be a rapid nuclear weapon launch platform...the rear twin launcher unit carry 12 MIRV nuclear missiles with 3 warhead each on the forearms instead are mounted 3 tubes compact nuclear missiles this means that at maximum at the same time this unit can fire 42 nuclear warheads more than enought to vapourize any form opposition...
Related content
Comments: 71
with nukes kicking ass hurt quite a lot !
π: 0 β©: 1
sempre piΓΉ cazzuti sti gelgoog! anche se come "nuclear weapon launch platform" preferisco il physalis
π: 0 β©: 1
Physalis standard o variante MLRS ?
π: 0 β©: 1
ZOMG! non me lo ricordavo l'MLRS! a questo punto direi quello
π: 0 β©: 1
una curiositΓ : ma l'MLRS ce l'ha il bazookone?
π: 0 β©: 1
non ricordo credo di si...
π: 0 β©: 1
speremo! secondo me perderebbe molto del suo fascino senza
π: 0 β©: 1
nice to see... but quite horrible effects... that's why this unit remained a prototype...
π: 0 β©: 1
XD because it had too many nukes? I thought nukes were good things ^^ LOL
π: 0 β©: 1
no i mean horrible effects on the targets... pepole mention nukes as a common thing... they don't even imagine how much devastating it's a nuke it can delete an area of several kilometers...
π: 0 β©: 1
I know how devastating a nuke is, after all it was a nuke that was dropped on Hiroshima, but with a weapon like that, why wouldn't they have it remotely controlled from another control center, then have it fly in to a massive enemy base and blow it up?
π: 0 β©: 1
it's just that i hate the idea of using nukes on city just to exterminate the population...
π: 0 β©: 1
True, true, but if things were to come down to one last measure to make sure that millions more would survive rather than being killed off by some corrupt government, I would just blow up the main government headquarters just to make sure no more innocent lives would ever be taken
π: 0 β©: 1
mhh... sound right but i can't avoid to think that there might be girls in that building... you know me i can't sleep if i have the doubt of having killed a girl...
π: 0 β©: 1
I know dude, I know, but in a sense, you must always remember, they had started all of it by making their own decisions, and by making those decisions, they end up with their own consequences
π: 0 β©: 1
true maybe i'm too much sensible...
π: 0 β©: 1
Nah, you're not Igor, you're just able to see the innocence in it all rather than the violence
π: 0 β©: 1
and it's somehow bad right ?
π: 0 β©: 1
No, seeing the innocence in things is good, it keeps you from doing something irrational that could become far worse than if you didn't re-think it
π: 0 β©: 1
so it's good... mhhh... ok then... i tought was a weakness... afterall evil pepole might use this against you...
π: 0 β©: 1
Sometimes, but you must always have a sense of innocence, and.... what's the opposite of innocent again? XD
π: 0 β©: 1
opposite of innocent ? is that be perv ? i'm that too 
π: 0 β©: 1
XD LOL, I dunno, but you know very well we both are XD *snuggles*
π: 0 β©: 1
well they have compact warheads and remeber that the Gelgoog it's an advanced hull that will entre in service when mankind will have the knowledge to do small enought warheads...
π: 0 β©: 1
They should also have sealed rounds. By having the tips of the missiles portruding instead of encased in a cyliner it reduces service life greatly.
π: 0 β©: 1
they are in launch position they are of course stored inside when in movement...
π: 0 β©: 1
I mean, they shouldn't extend. Have them simply lodged into a barrel container. Will keep corrosion in check.
π: 0 β©: 1
By the way, what's the weapon on the forearm?
π: 0 β©: 1
launcher of mid range defensive low power nuclear missiles... i know it's a bit... exagerated but it's a request you know...
π: 0 β©: 1
Wirst launched Davy Crockett or something?
π: 0 β©: 1
[Missiles look way too small for MIRV]
small.
SMALL.
FUCKING SMALL!??!?!??! IT'S A FUCKING GELGOOG. LOOK AT THE FUCKING SIZE OF THE NUKES!
Also, as a side note, the size of a nuke doesn't affect its strentgh- just its range
π: 0 β©: 2
If you mean the size of a missile, then you're still wrong. It affects the weigh it can lift. Thus, you can't lift powerful nukes with a tiny ballistic missile.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nukes. The REAL charge of a nuke is roughly the size of a person, and weights no more than 600 KG.
LRM missiles can lift up 300KG or so. These missile are way over LRM's power.
π: 0 β©: 1
But this is a MIRV, which means that it will need to lift the whole bus assembly too. Given the tiny size of the rockets this will probably have the Davy Crockett issue and be inside its own maximum blast radius.
There is no missile called LRM so I really don't know what you're talking about.
As far as submarines firing nukes; what?
π: 0 β©: 1
Look. The size of the nuke affects two things:
Resistance (Damage), thrust (weight, upthrust).
Now, the smaller the rocket, the lighter, but the less fuel and the smaller the engine. Now, nuclear charges aren't extremly large. As well as in MIRVs. Knowing this, now, thinking about your claim again, so, who's right?
It lowers the range of the nuke. True. But not heavily.
That is all.
π: 0 β©: 1
How can the size of a nuke affect the thrust of the launching vehicle? It's like saying an empty C-5 produces more thrust than a loaded one. It makes no sense whatsoever. It does affect weigh, which is the problem here, but not thrust.
As far as resistance, don't know what the heck you're talking about. An R-36 with 38x458kt is just as fragile as one with 15x1MT.
π: 0 β©: 1
For thrust. The bigger it is, the heavier, but the larger the thruster(s) can be, and the more fuel there can be- affects in the long run thrust and range, must be balanced- means they can be big, or small
Resistance- Air wise. Rockets are fast. The friction makes them hot. The thicker they are, the safer the workings inside are. This, alongside many other things.
π: 0 β©: 1
Are you speaking about the rockets or the warheads? Frankly, you confused me already. ICBMs aren't thick (their skin is surpsisingly thin or else they won't be able to fly) and the resistenace of the re-entry vehicles depends absolutely nothing on the rockets but merely on the thermal shield that they include. Trident II could use both W76 and W88, which were different warheads, propelled by a single rocket. But RVs are generally designed to withstand reentry heat (thus the name) regardless of the rocket that propels them.
Speaking of heat, I just noticed that this mecha will be exactly under the blazing, sun-hot rocket thrust plume of its own BMs.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yes it does, learn how nukes work please.
And an SLBM is roughly the size of the Geelgoog anyhow.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nuke rocket only affect range. Explosive is a different story.
How the fuck do you expect submarines to carry nukes!?!??
π: 0 β©: 1
Submarines DO carry nukes so I don't know what is your point there
π: 0 β©: 0
That...is...one....huge....robot....METAL GEAR TIME!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>