HOME | DD

In-The-Zone β€” Stupidity Stamp

Published: 2010-05-17 05:12:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 5973; Favourites: 692; Downloads: 24
Redirect to original
Description Don't you?

Stamp template by $zilla774
Related content
Comments: 103

In-The-Zone In reply to ??? [2017-02-02 08:13:43 +0000 UTC]

This is a 7 year old stamp, and my views have changed and I agree with you. So I would say yes I noticed in the grand scheme of things stupid people have used this stamp. Many people who claim they are "intelligent" and express their IQ numbers tend to be overcompensating for that which they are lacking.Β 

Many of my stamps with these kind of statements have been misused by the people at which they are aimed at. It is what it is.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midnight-Fantom In reply to In-The-Zone [2017-02-02 09:50:40 +0000 UTC]

Alright.

I don't know how many times I've been called "stupid" by an Anarcho Communist; meanwhile their ideology is a literal oxymoron.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EnforcerWolf [2016-08-02 20:23:32 +0000 UTC]

And it doesn't take a whole lot of work or time to do it either.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ReclusiveChicken [2015-12-17 17:48:10 +0000 UTC]

See, this is the thing about most stamp makers. They become depressed because of idiocy and other things, and they offset the depression by way of doing things which make others depressed. Hate is cancerous.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

CutestSith In reply to ReclusiveChicken [2016-09-20 17:59:39 +0000 UTC]

Want to know a kicker? Some of the lolcows of DA like have this stamp on their page.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

In-The-Zone In reply to CutestSith [2017-02-02 08:14:55 +0000 UTC]

I'll repeat what I'll said to someone else in an earlier comment:

Many of my stamps with these kind of statements have been misused by the people at which they are aimed at. I do revel in that irony.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midnight-Fantom In reply to CutestSith [2016-12-01 01:20:24 +0000 UTC]

Oh? And why exactly is that a "kicker"?

Are you just gonna call him a "lolcow" and pretend like that's "showing him" something?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CutestSith In reply to Midnight-Fantom [2016-12-01 01:42:50 +0000 UTC]

>Oh? And why exactly is that a "kicker"?

Supports the Confederacy.

Easily triggered.Β 

He has gotten better recently however. He unblocked me for starters.Β 

>Are you just gonna call him a "lolcow" and pretend like that's "showing him" something?

OH honey, sorry if I insulted your boyfriend.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midnight-Fantom In reply to CutestSith [2016-12-01 02:27:58 +0000 UTC]

1. Only SJWs can be triggered because SJWs are the ones that use "Trigger warnings" and the only ones that ask for it.

2. The Confederate Flag has multiple different interpretations.
The Confederate Flag to me (And I assume to him as well considering how much of what we agree upon) represents rebellion against a government which is trying to change your way of life.

3. Oh, so you're one of those nasty people who can only insult people, and arrogantly talk down to people.
You're a Trump supporter, you should know better than that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CutestSith In reply to Midnight-Fantom [2016-12-01 02:32:34 +0000 UTC]

>Nah it's very easy to trigger people be they SJW or not. You just have to find the right buttons.

>And to others it was about a failed state that represented slavery and throwing a bitch fit at a government on the possibility they may lose slaves

>I wasn't arrogantly talking down to you. I swear honey!

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midnight-Fantom In reply to CutestSith [2016-12-01 02:49:37 +0000 UTC]

-Seems to me that you're using the term "triggered" incorrectly.

- Actually, the Civil War was about economics, The north had slaves too ya know (just not as common, since most slave ships came into South Carolina). The Civil War was caused because the South had disproportionately more wealth than the north through the production of cotton, and could influence the outcome of elections using their slaves (hence the reason that slavery was the primary thing that the North wanted to change).

Funnily enough, the "race" aspect was simply created by the Southern Democrats for the same reason that Democrats today use race, Identity politics.Β 

- In the last few comments, you've said the following things to either me, or

"Some of the lolcows of DA likeΒ  Β have this stamp on their page."

"OH honey, sorry if I insulted your boyfriend. "

In 2 comments, you've not only had to substitute your points for insults, but you've also talked down to us. Which you're now trying to claim you haven't.
Why are you using Leftist debate tactics? Don't you see what those tactics have done for them? Just look at how they're acting right now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CutestSith In reply to Midnight-Fantom [2016-12-01 04:09:19 +0000 UTC]

>Seems to me that you're using the term "triggered" incorrectly.

Seeing as how this triggered you.Β 

>- Actually, the Civil War was about economics, The north had slaves too ya know (just not as common, since most slave ships came into South Carolina). The Civil War was caused because the South had disproportionately more wealth than the north through the production of cotton, and could influence the outcome of elections using their slaves (hence the reason that slavery was the primary thing that the North wanted to change).

So it was based around slaveryΒ then?

>n 2 comments, you've not only had to substitute your points for insults, but you've also talked down to us. Which you're now trying to claim you haven't.
Why are you using Leftist debate tactics? Don't you see what those tactics have done for them? Just look at how they're acting right now.

Let me fix that for you. I put my point in ways that are less then angelic but you just got salty over it.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midnight-Fantom In reply to CutestSith [2016-12-01 04:16:15 +0000 UTC]

- Lol, so basically this is what you've done
You: "HE'S TRIGGERED"
Me: "He can't be *explains why*"
You: "Well, people are easy to trigger"
Me: "You seem to be misusing the word "triggered"
You: "YOU'RE TRIGGERED"

Brilliant rhetorical device you've created.

- Nope, I literally just explained how it was based on economics.

- Are you just incapable of debating without using Ad Hominems?
Because now you're using that bullshit "You're just salty" tactic.

Heads up, any retort that uses the logic of "You're just {Insert random adjective here} because {Insert arbitrary prescribed motivation here}" is inherently flawed, because you're putting words in their mouth.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CutestSith In reply to Midnight-Fantom [2016-12-01 04:21:26 +0000 UTC]

>Brilliant rhetorical device you've created.

Prime example of being triggered really.Β 

>- Nope, I literally just explained how it was based on economics.

Based on slavery.Β 

>Because now you're using that bullshit "You're just salty" tactic.

Well the salt is rising here.Β 

>Heads up, any retort that uses the logic of "You're just {Insert random adjective here} because {Insert arbitrary prescribed motivation here}" is inherently flawed, because you're putting words in their mouth.

That is good to know. I will now disregard everything you have just said since you put words into my mouth.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midnight-Fantom In reply to CutestSith [2016-12-01 04:29:15 +0000 UTC]

So now that you're just being a contrarian, I'm gonna stop.

I thought that there was no such thing as an "ignorant Trump supporter", but apparently this is me proven wrong.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

CutestSith In reply to Midnight-Fantom [2016-12-01 16:01:42 +0000 UTC]

>So now that you're just being a contrarian, I'm gonna stop.

Β 

>I thought that there was no such thing as an "ignorant Trump supporter"

ApparentlyΒ you never looked at yourself.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

In-The-Zone In reply to ReclusiveChicken [2015-12-26 05:04:27 +0000 UTC]

Meh. I don't currently reflect my old opinions but I keep it up so other people can enjoy them. To be honest, I don't put energy into 'proving people's stupidity' because it's a huge fucking time sink.

Your sweeping generalizations are rather unfounded. I'm not a hateful person by any stretch, though if people find criticism hateful they are in for a rude awakening when that is not at all the case.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ReclusiveChicken In reply to In-The-Zone [2015-12-26 05:30:02 +0000 UTC]

I know that I'm being very generalised (and it's the very thing that I'm fighting against), but having been through an episode of drama with a hateful emo, I've been seeing the nasty side of this website a lot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

In-The-Zone In reply to ReclusiveChicken [2016-01-04 08:00:27 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I can understand why people get that impression from me. My icon looks like one of those trollfags too which honestly is a parody of people who troll, lol.

I tend to stay away from 'that' side of the website, mostly full of angsty HS to freshman college kids having no hobbies to do so they troll for entertainment.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ReclusiveChicken In reply to In-The-Zone [2016-01-04 08:10:02 +0000 UTC]

Trust me, I've met a few of them. There's one who tried to prove their intelligence by throwing some C++ books onto their bed and snapping a picture of them and showing it to me, but they'd reduced themselves to creepypasta material.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

In-The-Zone In reply to ReclusiveChicken [2016-01-04 08:58:27 +0000 UTC]

Jesus. Why would they do that?

Yeah, I've seen a few who use greentext by doing ">" a lot which is an easy way on spotting them. Showing off how much they know how to post on 4chan.

I haven't been around that scene in 5 years. I used to follow some trolls around here. Some troll I actually really liked they turned from troll to a good artist, but they aren't active anymore.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ReclusiveChicken In reply to In-The-Zone [2016-01-04 09:11:34 +0000 UTC]

I, too have befriended former enemies. I've also gone from FNAF fan to serial artist very quickly.

For every corrupted spot on the Internet, there's a gold mine waiting nearby.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

In-The-Zone In reply to ReclusiveChicken [2016-01-05 00:07:43 +0000 UTC]

Honestly very true. Even if it's a dramatic fandom there is always someone cool among st the shit.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ReclusiveChicken In reply to In-The-Zone [2016-01-05 05:47:18 +0000 UTC]

There's stuff way outside these social networks, too. I've got declassified archives, JS experiments and a load of messed-up music in my bookmarks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Gone-Goodbye [2015-12-04 12:36:59 +0000 UTC]

I do.
I deal with stupid people everyday.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Quick-5 [2015-11-26 19:19:39 +0000 UTC]

Me too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SorciereD-Infloresce [2015-03-20 04:01:18 +0000 UTC]

It is always a pleasure to do so, as well as taking advantage of them.

Have you tried manipulating a person's mind by playing mind games with them?
To witness their level of ignorance?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

In-The-Zone In reply to SorciereD-Infloresce [2015-03-20 22:24:41 +0000 UTC]

It's a pleasure to do so when it is deserved. I never went out of my way to abuse and manipulate someone if it they didn't deserve it.

I am not into games, I just do it if I need to get by in life, and if it's for fun then that's usually during the summer break when I don't have college or if I'm somehow unemployed. I don't have time for that shit anymore lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SorciereD-Infloresce In reply to In-The-Zone [2015-03-21 02:25:00 +0000 UTC]


Yes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LostAtSeaOFF [2015-01-30 12:58:24 +0000 UTC]

It's so amusing to argue with dumb people, Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LokiPufff [2014-12-03 21:36:01 +0000 UTC]

i dont like it. I SIMPLY LOVE IT

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Julihn [2014-11-08 13:59:56 +0000 UTC]

I don't like it I looove it....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HUANGXUELI [2014-08-29 04:44:56 +0000 UTC]

Love it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Commander-Dominic [2014-08-25 13:37:30 +0000 UTC]

I like doing it sometimes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KittenLoverPink [2014-06-01 03:11:19 +0000 UTC]

yes I do
butΒ the thing is I never tell them about it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ZahraDesu [2014-04-08 14:45:33 +0000 UTC]

Oh YES >:3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SealyTheSeal [2014-04-05 00:48:32 +0000 UTC]

The thing is, that stupid people won't listen to your point and call themselves smart. .-.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

In-The-Zone In reply to SealyTheSeal [2014-05-10 01:50:29 +0000 UTC]

True.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SealyTheSeal In reply to In-The-Zone [2014-05-10 01:56:55 +0000 UTC]

I agree with my signature. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LokiPufff In reply to SealyTheSeal [2014-12-03 21:37:15 +0000 UTC]

i seriously agree. also, there is this person named wolfsox...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Azurewhiterose [2014-03-26 11:33:39 +0000 UTC]

Meh, not really. It's not a very nice thing to do. I don't take pleasure in bringing people down.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpetsnazKaz [2014-03-15 18:52:32 +0000 UTC]

I often do my research and quote the stupid shit they post in journals, previous comments, etc. to use that as an awesome comeback.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Pointerofreality [2014-03-08 04:27:25 +0000 UTC]

Eh...not really I derive no pleasure from breaking someone down. I'd prefer bringing myself and others up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DiabolicalWolf [2013-01-03 04:58:40 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes~

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

In-The-Zone In reply to DiabolicalWolf [2013-01-03 06:31:40 +0000 UTC]

>3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Flaivdar [2012-11-11 10:37:38 +0000 UTC]

I've done this about 4 times now. Tell a camwhore her crotch shots aren't artistic and watch the Manbabies throw a shitstorm of insults before blocking you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

In-The-Zone In reply to Flaivdar [2012-11-15 04:28:47 +0000 UTC]

Oh I've done that before a few times. It's funny to watch the blue-balled-butthurt men whinge that you're insulting their porn content when they can get better quality porn elsewhere.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mloun [2012-05-10 22:37:35 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Silentninja284 [2012-03-01 02:15:45 +0000 UTC]

FFF- I just did this today

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Deadmeat553 [2012-01-30 04:45:44 +0000 UTC]

You cannot prove another person's stupidity, only their ignorance.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>