HOME | DD
Isometry3D β Bar
#3d #3dart #bar #blender #digitalart #interior #interiordesign #isometric #lowpoly #isometry3d
Published: 2018-08-01 15:42:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 961; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Not much of a drinker myself, but would you go to a bar like this one? Tried a little bit of interior lighting on this scene. Even though it is not one of my favorites, I think it looks pretty good.Let me know your thoughts!
Related content
Comments: 47
Thank you! It was quite hard to work out how to do it properly, though. But I am totally satisfied with the result
π: 0 β©: 0
I liked the warm colours. The main thing bothering me is how all bottles are perfectly aligned. Of course, manually placing every single bottle is a pain, using an array modifier is much more practical
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, I see what you mean. I could have perhaps move a little bit the first ones I made, then duplicated them in different positions and in no particular order, and them modified them as I wanted. The array modifier would haven been useful too, I guess, though I'm not particularly familiar with it. Thanks for commenting, I'll think about it next time!
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh, you duplicated the objects? That seems like a lot of work compared to using an array.
One trick is also to use a particle system: Make a mesh without any faces, only a single line (with multiple vertices), and set the particle system to emit from the vertices. You can give the particles a random rotation around the Z axis as well.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hahaha, yeah, I did, I know get what you wanted to say with that of using the array modifier. I didn't understand how to use it to place them in different positions on the x-axis, but I see know that it wasn't what you meant. Using the particle system is a very good idea. It would make it a lot easier. Guess I'll try that out next time!
π: 0 β©: 0
have you ever tried an app called 'One room' it allows you to create rooms just like this.
π: 0 β©: 1
I haven't! I'll look it up, though I don't think I'll be able to manipulate everything I need as I can in BlenderΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
Maybe if it had non-Euclidean geometry & served Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters.
π: 0 β©: 1
I actually had to look that up. Who said they don't serve it?Β
π: 0 β©: 1
What about the Non-Euclidean Geometry?
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, that would be quite hard to make. Really hard, actually, I guess
π: 0 β©: 1
You mean youβd need to know the secrets of Rβlyeh to pull it off?
π: 0 β©: 1
That's far beyond my knowledge
π: 0 β©: 1
Did you at least get the reference?
π: 0 β©: 1
Unfortunately, not
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh, that's were it is from? I do know Cthulhu, and I do know H. P. Lovecraft, but I have never read any of his works (though I really want to, but can't make the time to do so)
π: 0 β©: 1
Pronouncing his name would blow the consonant sound budget of the very existence of the English Language itself.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yep, I know. Thought it was impossible to be pronounced by human being, though
π: 0 β©: 1
Man, that was interesting. And creepy
π: 0 β©: 1
Never lose a bet to a Beholder.
π: 0 β©: 1
I was making a joke. You don't know what a "beholder" is?
π: 0 β©: 1
I know you were. And I do know what a "beholder" is, actually. Is a kind of sphere-shaped monster with one big eye, and many other little ones coming out of his body. It manipulates some sort of magic, and certainly isn't something I'd like to face.
π: 0 β©: 1
In general, making a bet with a supernatural being is a bad idea. The terms covering what the loser will have to do will be set up so that the human won't be able to do it without somehow humiliating itself, while the monster will not only do it without being humiliated, but will invariably do it so perfectly as to kill the human's victory boner.
π: 0 β©: 1
I think that the terms covering what the loser would have to do when making a bet with a supernatural being would be set up considering the differences between both beings, as to make it fairer. That way, both the human and the supernatural being would have to do something different according to their capabilities. But that's difficult say, as no other intelligent life form different from us has been found , and therefore such a bet has never been made. Whether they'd get to an agreement or not is uncertain.
π: 0 β©: 1
If you're implying that the monster would use its psychic abilities to cheat or anything like that, they don't. Usually the loser terms would involve something they both would be perfectly capable of doing without supernatural abilities, but which the human can't do without humiliating itself.
π: 0 β©: 1
What I was saying is that it wouldn't be cheating if the monster would use his psychic abilities, as they're a part of it, and the human would know this when making a bet against it. So, considering that the monsters will always have the advantage, I supposed that the loser terms would be more severe for the monster that for the human
π: 0 β©: 1
Still, like I said: Usually the loser terms would involve something that both individuals would be perfectly capable of doing without the aid supernatural abilities, but which the human can't do without humiliating itself.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's exactly what I'm saying that wouldn't happen. I insist, as I don't think you're getting my point. Imagine you've made a bet against a monster with massive strength. Then, imagine that the one who loses had to be hit by the winner. It wouldn't be fair for the human. So I think they'd get to an agreement in which the human would be hit, for instance, just one time if he loses, and the monster, 10 times, as to give a random number. That would be fairer. Equally, if the aim of the bet is to make someone humiliate himself/herself/itself, then there'd be no point in establishing the same conditions to different beings with even more different abilities.
π: 0 β©: 1
Still, win some, lose some.
π: 0 β©: 1
What do you mean?
π: 0 β©: 1
A deal's a deal. You gotta honor it.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm not saying you don't. I'm saying no one would ever make a deal by which the other being has no chance of getting humiliated, while you do. The deal says that if you lose, you get humiliated. So, if both beings get humiliated by doing different things, the losing terms may differ from one another.
π: 0 β©: 1
the seats under the dart board is defnatly a health and safety hazard so no i would not go there other than that cool lighting
π: 0 β©: 1
Hahaha, yeah, maybe, I wouldn't neither. Though I originally though that people might get out of that seat in order to play, or to let other play. But yeah, it isn't the best position. And thanks! I think the lighting is better here than in the other rooms I made
π: 0 β©: 1
Hello! The sherry-picker is back again
Why there is a free access to the liq. in the left corner next to the bar?
How a palm could survive when there is no natural light?
Keep up the great work!
π: 0 β©: 2
The liq. that are there were meant to be like some kind of rare wines of some sort. To get there, you should go past all the people in the bar, grab one of them, and get out of there. And that certainly wouldn't be easy, as honest people wouldn't let someone steal something (I supposed), and the barman would easily notice.Β
As for the palm, well, you could think of it as a bar which opens just at night. During the day, the owner could just put it outside and enter it when the place's open. However, yeah, that would be annoying.
Oh, and thanks for commenting! I'm glad you could point out a couple of 'weird' things. Guess I should pay special attention to details
π: 0 β©: 1
Hello!
All is fine! You doing a great job and next to building the stuff you spend time and energy to have something to upload.
So DO NOT take all of my "critique" for 100% serious and NOT as a bad critique from me!
References and details are important - next to good light and texture.
So maybe it's time to visit a bar for research?
π: 0 β©: 1
Hey!Β
Thanks 
π: 0 β©: 0
yes good point about the liq perhaps i would go there for free drinks then
π: 0 β©: 0