HOME | DD
IvanAndreevich β Purity
Published: 2010-10-27 01:53:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 41018; Favourites: 1353; Downloads: 4614
Redirect to original
Description
I think it's curious how different of a photo you can get in the same place, at the same time, simply by framing it differently
Download includes up to 2560x1600, 2560x1440, and 1600x1200.
Location: Garibaldi Lake, Garibaldi Provincial Park, Beautiful British Columbia.
Equipment: Nikon D90 + Tokina 11-16mm.
Edit: re-processed August 2011. New version is much better
Related content
Comments: 134
The whole picture is stunning and the reflections in the lake are marvelous
π: 0 β©: 0
This looks so serene and beautiful
π: 0 β©: 0
I totally love these photos. Very emotive; I can see I am going to have to visit British Columbia, Garibaldi Provincial park: and I'll definately be taking a good digital SLR with me!!
π: 0 β©: 0
The water is so remarkably clear! 
π: 0 β©: 1
Nothing to pollute it
π: 0 β©: 1
These photos are definitely some of the best I've ever seen. You really have a serious talent.
π: 0 β©: 0
these shots are simply breathtaking..you really know how to capture the beautiful essence of mother nature<3
π: 0 β©: 0
I am also into Landscape work, please dont take this the wrong way but are any of ya pix photoshopped? eitherway they are AMAZING where did u take most of em???
π: 0 β©: 0
Love all your photos... it's breathtaking! Contemplating in buying the Tokina 11-16mm. Do you recommend it over Nikkor, Sigma or Tamron?
π: 0 β©: 1
Sigma 8-16 is where it's at right now, I think
π: 0 β©: 1
OK thanks. I will look at it. The Tokina 11-16mm sells for $719 now.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's expensive. I got mine for $500 barely used.
π: 0 β©: 1
I will look around for a used one. The Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 did not have a good review. They say that the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 is much better.
π: 0 β©: 1
Does it really matter at f/8 or f/11? I don't think so..
π: 0 β©: 1
Ken Rockwell says..."This Tokina 11-16mm is the world's fastest and sharpest ultrawide lens for small format digital cameras (Nikon DX and Canon 1.6x)."
π: 0 β©: 1
I know, I read his reviews. But he's the one to point out that stopped down most of these lenses are the same. f/2.8 makes no difference whatsoever for this type of lens.
π: 0 β©: 1
So you recommend to buy the Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 which sells for $699?
π: 0 β©: 1
I would, because it's 30% wider
π: 0 β©: 2
What can you say about the cons on the Sigma 8-16mm lens?
***CA towards edges of the frame at 8mm
***Falloff at 8mm
***No way to attach filters
π: 0 β©: 1
CA and vignetting is pretty easily corrected. Filters are a problem, I forgot about that.
π: 0 β©: 1
I am ready to follow your recommendation about the Sigma 8-16mm over the Tokina 11-16mm but I saw the problem with filters on the reviews.
Maybe someone will make adapters to use filters on this type of lens.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm sure it will vignette like crazy.. That's too bad
π: 0 β©: 1
Maybe I should stick with the Tokina 11-16mm.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thanks. I will read the reviews on the Sigma 8-16mm.
π: 0 β©: 0
I simply don`t know what to say. Feel I want to skip my exams just to go British Colombia = )
π: 0 β©: 1
Why not do it after the exams?
π: 0 β©: 1
Your HDR pictures are just amazing. I have a question for you. The park where you have been taking these gorgeous pics, is it possible to camp in the there or you just go for a hike?
π: 0 β©: 1
Campsites 100 meters behind me
π: 0 β©: 1
OMGGGG~ btw, did you use a tripod in that shots? I heard I can do some HDR shots with different exposures without one. Do you recommend?
π: 0 β©: 1
I usually don't use a tripod for day time shots. Photomatix can correct small shifts.
π: 0 β©: 0
that's because there's nothing more complex and different than the Earth combined with our eyes.
this one looks mysterious...
π: 0 β©: 0
You have requested critics, but these pictures cant be better Oo
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>