HOME | DD
JakeSutton7 — Largest Hadrosaurs
Published: 2020-02-09 05:15:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 2862; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Left to rightMagnapaulia laticaudus
Shantungosaurus giganteus
Edmontosaurus annectens
Hypsibema missouriensis?
Saurolophus angustirostris
Amurosaurus riabinini
Parasaurolophus jiayinensis
*note Magnapaulia isn't longer then Shant or Edmont but given its impressive height that is why it is at the front
Skeletals by
paleosir
Gregory S Paul
randomdinos
GetAwayTrike
Paleop
UPDATE 2/09: Magnapaulia has a better skull shape and Saurolophus has been upscaled
Related content
Comments: 9
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GAT's Magna suffers from improper shoulder placement and thus has biped syndrome
However the skull works just fine
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gat's magna seems to have near identical shoulder placement to the skel you used (provided it's not an edit)
it's also not that hard to fix.
Also why do you refer to the resulting shoulder crunch as biped syndrome and by doing so are you trying to imply hadrosaurs aren't bipedal?
The proportions on Gat's are also closer to H. altispinus, which afaik is Magna's closest relative.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh not in that, it is fact that Hadrosaurs were capable of bipedal movement however the way the has them reconstructed makes them appear to be oblique bipeds
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thank you for clearing that up
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You either misscaled the Amurosaurus or the Saurolophus. I haven't checked your scaling rigorously but I know my Saurolophus is about 3.8 m tall at the hip (illium height), compared to 3.6 m of Amurosaurus (also ilium height).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, the scale I had was not using the larger Saurolophus specimen and so it was updated
👍: 0 ⏩: 0