HOME | DD

Published: 2010-10-22 21:56:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 5893; Favourites: 348; Downloads: 131
Redirect to original
Description
08 Toothless - How to Train Your Dragon - suggested by30 Character Challenge
Other Characters: [link]
Anna suggested Toothless which is a GREAT suggestion, especially since the movie came out on DVD only a couple days ago and I've been meaning to draw a picture of him that looked decent since I saw the thing in a theater.
Toothless is super-adorable brave and loyal friend to Hiccup, the twiggiest viking. If you have not seen the movie then redbox that bizzness because you must. And I dare you not to fall in love with Toothless because I don't think it's possible.
(ps, I think I know what everyone's gonna color in this round's coloring competition... because I wanna color it ^^)
But enough from me, Anna, what would you like to share about Toothless?
A: "HE'S THE CUTEST DRAGON EVER AND HE REMINDS ME OF MY CATS!!... and He's one of the most unqiue dragons I ever seen."
Related content
Comments: 39
carlzsays [2011-07-06 22:22:57 +0000 UTC]
I love this!
And the Animator admited that he based Toothless off of their new kitten
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jameson9101322 In reply to wosososo [2010-10-23 18:25:09 +0000 UTC]
I've heard they're very different than what was presented in the movie. a
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wosososo In reply to jameson9101322 [2010-10-24 03:06:15 +0000 UTC]
yea in the bookz toothless is a small dragon literaly like the size of a laptop
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IngwellRitter [2010-10-23 11:06:56 +0000 UTC]
I want to see this movie, the dragon is so cute
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nemonus [2010-10-23 02:16:49 +0000 UTC]
Gah, I love Toothless and the way he moves--those animators really did their research. I like how you've fit his wings and tail into the picture, like he's just spun around. Great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
spartan301 [2010-10-23 01:35:04 +0000 UTC]
is it funny that I am watching that movie right now?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SPARTAN064 [2010-10-22 23:56:12 +0000 UTC]
I would Redbox it.... IF EVERYONE ELSE DIDN'T! grr
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rad1986 [2010-10-22 23:38:13 +0000 UTC]
Wow...! What a coincidence, I watched that move last night for the first time!! What a great movie! And yes, love for the dragon!
~*~ Rad
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Allantsuki [2010-10-22 23:22:24 +0000 UTC]
AWW HOW CUTE
I wanted to watch that movie so much I didn't get to watch it D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jameson9101322 In reply to Allantsuki [2010-10-23 00:38:23 +0000 UTC]
Well, it's on DVD now so you can
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Allantsuki In reply to jameson9101322 [2010-10-23 00:44:07 +0000 UTC]
I'll try to find it here
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Anna-aurion [2010-10-22 23:15:56 +0000 UTC]
HE'S THE CUTEST DRAGON EVER AND HE REMINDS ME OF MY CATS!!
And you draw him so adorably!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jameson9101322 In reply to Anna-aurion [2010-10-23 00:37:24 +0000 UTC]
Well thank you, do you want that all caps section to be the part I transcribe on the pic?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anna-aurion In reply to jameson9101322 [2010-10-23 00:44:08 +0000 UTC]
No, you can take "away" the caps. XD I was spazzing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jameson9101322 In reply to Anna-aurion [2010-10-23 00:44:55 +0000 UTC]
^^ I was aking more for the content, that's all you want to say about him? Now's your opportunity to wax poetic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anna-aurion In reply to jameson9101322 [2010-10-23 00:54:42 +0000 UTC]
Um, He's one of the most unqiue dragons I ever seen. That's all I got, i swear
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Artoveli [2010-10-22 22:11:36 +0000 UTC]
Aww, Toothless! Thatwas a good suggestion. I've seen it about five times now overall (thrice in theaters and twice since Monday), and I still completely enjoy it every time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jameson9101322 In reply to Artoveli [2010-10-22 22:16:37 +0000 UTC]
It's a very very very good movie. I'm rooting for it for Oscars. I mean, I love Pixar, but if Toy Story 3 wins over Dragon I'll be a sad panda.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artoveli In reply to jameson9101322 [2010-10-22 23:35:22 +0000 UTC]
Toy Story 3 was also a very good movie. But Dragon really stood out from the crowd. From a purely technical standpoint, I found the visuals much more impressive too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jameson9101322 In reply to Artoveli [2010-10-23 00:39:20 +0000 UTC]
I thought it was better from every angle, myself. I had a real beef with ToyStory3's story...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artoveli In reply to jameson9101322 [2010-10-23 00:55:24 +0000 UTC]
I remember. You didn't like all the obvious reaches at your heartstrings. Personally, I find most of Pixar's movies to have that saccharin sweetness to them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jameson9101322 In reply to Artoveli [2010-10-23 01:07:36 +0000 UTC]
not that blatant though. Up got my heart but it got my heart legitmately- through emotion and building character. The tricks in Toy Story 3 lacked all subtlety. It lacked even the subtlety that existed in Toy Story 2. Everything was SUPER BIG and SUPER FAST and SUPER SAD... there was no time to breathe and there was not a lot of contrast. No quiet times like Jessie sitting by the windowsill dealing with the tough memories of her past, there was no Marlin taking Nemo's little fin in his hands the same way he held his egg when he was a baby, realizing that he's been too protective of him because of the love he has for him and the fear of losing him, there's no Sully having to say goodbye to Boo....
... but How to Train Your Dragon had those things. The scene at the end when we realized he'd lost his leg and seeing that he and Toothless were the same - and that they completed each other... that was an awesome moment. It was both surprising and moving and in a way very 'real'. The end of toy story 3 where Andy nearly cries when Debbie(?) makes Woody wave at him? That was campy to me. It didn't help that I was pissed that the whole message of the movie was "You have to leave your childhood behind when you grow up" either. I'll be the first to admit that part of my resistance to it was that it was lecutring me about how I wasn't an adult because I still have the dolls I played with when I was little.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artoveli In reply to jameson9101322 [2010-10-23 02:37:57 +0000 UTC]
Hm, I don't quite agree with you on all of that. See, I find stories about inanimate objects always have an undercurrent of... hmmm, impending tragedy? I think that describes it. Growing up, I personified everything around me. I still do, it's just automatic. Heehee, I could tell you the life-stories of all the cutlery and cups in our kitchen, to say nothing of the toothbrushes in the bathroom! Toys, well, that's a no-brainer of course. But over the years we've lost a few. (er, toothbrushes especially) And I don't know about you, but my family moved around a lot while I was getting older, and every time it was a battle to hang onto our toys through another move (a rather stressful battle that usually involved hiding our favorites among the rest of our stuff so Mom wouldn't find them after she'd already put them out in bags for us to give away). Incidentally, we've finally hit upon the perfect excuse: "We babysit all the time Mom, and you know the best babysitters are the ones with a full toy box!"
Sooo my point is, right from the first Toy Story there was this dreadful feeling that things were not always going to be this way for the characters (in fact, doesn't Woody say something about that right at the end of the first movie? "When that day comes, I'll have old Buzz Lightyear to keep me company"). I got that same feeling from The Brave Little Toaster actually. So when Toy Story 3 decided to tackle that topic, the only way to do it justice WAS to make it super sad and largely traumatic, cause that's true to life.
It's how I felt every time we lost one, only this was showing it from the side of the toys themselves.
Also, I didn't really get that the point was that you need to give up your toys and move on from your childhood; the point I got was more along the lines of "If you're not using your toys, then instead of putting them in the attic maybe you could see about giving them to a kid who might get more use out of them?"
Not that I intend to follow that advice either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jameson9101322 In reply to Artoveli [2010-10-23 02:54:40 +0000 UTC]
I wasnt trying to belittle the idea of giving inanimate objects personalities or saying that the idea was a bad one. I just didn't like how it was done. We can have tragedy without the swirling vortex of fiery death, and we can have Andy giving his toys away at the end without making it go so far that I got sucked out of the movie.
Whatever my argument is, the fact is that when the really mushy stuff was happening, I wasn't feeling it. I was watching the movie going "golly this is mushy". With the fabulous track record that Pixar has had so far and with all the tears they've make me shed there has to have been some way for them to tell the same story with the same themes without crossing that line from emotional to campy. I might just have a finer line than some.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artoveli In reply to jameson9101322 [2010-10-23 03:17:48 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps it's just a matter of people having different camp-thresholds... There are parts of Finding Nemo I find hard to stomach for that reason, and I don't even KNOW why Cars did so well... There's an amount of campyness in every animated film even remotely connected to Disney (certain Ghibli films aside, but they don't really count cause Disney's just the Western distributor). Sometimes I'm willing to play along and sometimes I'm not. I related to Toy Story 3, so while I was not blind to its tactics, I played along.
All in all though, HTTYD was better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0