HOME | DD

Jasdevi-Crack — More practice: Sybil

Published: 2012-08-23 19:24:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 91; Favourites: 0; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description Nice boobs Sybil

more practice

also trying to flesh out her design better

this is what is under her skirts and such

Sybil(c)Me

REALLY MISS HAVING A SCANNER
Related content
Comments: 36

Abacrius [2012-08-23 19:32:16 +0000 UTC]

Hmmmm....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-23 19:47:24 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-23 19:51:05 +0000 UTC]

I am being a pensive man right now....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-23 19:51:42 +0000 UTC]

Penny for your thoughts?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-23 19:52:46 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps... I do see a few issues with the proportions here. They're there, but you have the talent to fix zhem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-23 19:56:36 +0000 UTC]

sdksjfh ;A;
I knowwww

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-23 19:57:30 +0000 UTC]

is it alright if I state it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-23 19:57:48 +0000 UTC]

Yes please

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-23 20:22:47 +0000 UTC]

The biggest issues I see are the arms and legs.... Her legs are, in that pic, from the bottom of her sole to her hip joint, roughly the size of her torso, maybe a bit longer; in most women (and I'm going from an average anatomical way here) their legs are longer than their heads and torsos, from joint to sole. I don't know the exact difference.... But from what I can tell, about half her calf and from her ankle down are above her head, assuming she isn't long-legged. Also, your torso itself could use a little work... Her hips seem to utterly disappear into her legs without any indication of her pelvic structure (in other words the thing that gives women dem curves in terms of being a pear shape and whatnot). If you want I can send you a pic of a respectfully anatomically-accurate sketch, the same model I used to draw Lunixiana. Granted, I know Sybil is of a full figure so I'm taking a lot of what I'm saying as for the "hourglass" base body, but it also seems to apply to the "pear" base body. Also (please don't hate me for reaming it) her left breast looks a little.... Funky. Humans are by no means symmetrical, but we're usually similar enough that women VERY VERY RARELY have breasts of differing sizes. Now to move from legs, hips, and bewbs to her arms... I can see how you're trying to cross her arms behind her back, but with the way you have her torso and such drawn her arms look like they'd be super-long, and they just seem to poof behind her back... I try to draw through to avoid it.

And one final note about her pelvis/hips; don't take my word for it because I'm still a noob with female bodies; a lot of the times the hips SEEM to flow into the thighs, but they often have a curve of their own that gets overlooked.


Please don't hate me, love.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-23 21:22:00 +0000 UTC]

Oh and, something I learned a while ago was that the breast that's over the heart, is the one that's slightly bigger (because boobs are hardly ever perfectly symetrical, but the difference not usually THAT noticable OTL)

But looking at the picture, it's her right breast that's bigger asdf
which is actually plausible, because my right boob is bigger than my left (and I realize this because it's my body asdf)

but I usually like to draw boobs as symmetrical as possible. So I kind of bungled it OTL

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-24 00:21:09 +0000 UTC]

I know THAT.... I just meant that it's so freakin' rare for the size difference to be as noticeable as it is in this pic. The size difference is often pretty minimal; to MY knowledge, it usually differs by the number by a few integers but it's usually a congenital defect if someone has one C-cup and one A-cup breast. XD but don't worry, I see what you mean. I tend to make them pseudo-symmetrical due to aesthetic purposes. (blame the artists I've studied)


And you're right. But what I mean is that it's usually not THAT noticeable, as you said. XD breasts, like someone's face and legs, are hardly ever on a symmetrical plane.


I know what you mean OTL

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-25 20:49:41 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm sure there is cases where the cup sizes get all weird but yeah.
Yeah. It just looks better when they are.

Nope. Symmetry is for pussies anyway //shot

Still. I know the sizes are weird but I'm a little proud of their shape. sorta. I used to draw them really weird kgjlhdfkghkfjghkljh.
Pro tip with boobies: Breasts, not balloons kfjhkjdfhkdjf

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-25 22:36:07 +0000 UTC]

Pretty much. And like I said... It's rare that anyone but the owner of the breasts notices a non-massive size difference.


//takes the bullet


Precisely. I used to draw balloon boobs... Now I draw actual BEWBS.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-25 22:52:09 +0000 UTC]

yep. o3o

fghkdjhkfjgh /revives

ME TOO
HOORAY
and Sybil's will be fun to draw. yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-25 23:08:16 +0000 UTC]

Yeah.


I LIVE!!!


Yup.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-26 08:26:59 +0000 UTC]

o3o

WHOO

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-26 14:43:51 +0000 UTC]

FEESHY


hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-28 06:43:16 +0000 UTC]

GLUB GLUB

teehee

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-28 23:07:08 +0000 UTC]

DON'T SAY GLUB GLUB.... MENTAL IMAGES OF MARKUS SHAHKRIS KILLING HOMESTUCK TROLLS.... XD


hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-30 06:48:24 +0000 UTC]

Oh lord. xD

teehee

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-30 20:14:52 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-31 06:47:29 +0000 UTC]

|D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-30 20:13:31 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-23 20:30:41 +0000 UTC]

why would I hate you
I keep saying I need this kind of thing, how the fuck else am I going to improve?

thank you, by the way. I appreciate it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-23 20:32:01 +0000 UTC]

I know, I'm just used to people who get feelinghurt over my critiques....


I'm taking anatomy... I might sketch up an anterior diagram of both genders.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-23 20:36:29 +0000 UTC]

For the longest time I've asked for people to pick apart my work and tell me how I can improve and they just ignore me
I LOVE getting critiques.

That would be extremely useful OuO

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-24 00:21:56 +0000 UTC]

I see. I try to be constructive... Only issue is I hold everyone to the same standard, with a few exceptions OTL


I'm working on getting there. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-25 20:46:28 +0000 UTC]

Ahhhhhhhh

xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-25 20:48:36 +0000 UTC]

So please DO NOT HATE ME FOR THAT!.


Hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-25 20:50:26 +0000 UTC]

Pffft I don't hate you

ouo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-25 22:29:51 +0000 UTC]

*superduperhug* I try to hold people to the highest standards of their talent...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-28 06:44:02 +0000 UTC]

//hugs back
I know

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-28 23:09:32 +0000 UTC]

So yes. Critiques from me shred your work apart.... But it's because I KNOW you have the talent to do better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-30 06:47:48 +0000 UTC]

I want you to nitpick.
Again, how else would I learn?
So yes, exactly. Yes good.

You're never a butt about it so don't apologize when you critique me! o3o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Abacrius In reply to Jasdevi-Crack [2012-08-30 20:14:40 +0000 UTC]

True....


okayyyyy

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jasdevi-Crack In reply to Abacrius [2012-08-31 06:47:37 +0000 UTC]

There you go!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0