HOME | DD

#cain #fact #able
Published: 2015-06-22 22:39:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 843; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
A response to the Far-Left's war on the Second Amendment. The bible never mentions Cain killing his brother Able with and AR-15, shotgun or any firearms. Only a rock.Besides the Gun Control will only affect law abiding citizens as criminals will continue to find ways to get guns and cause terror on citizens. Even if we managed to use knives, swords, martial arts or even set traps, the Far-Left will go after them and side with the criminals with corrupted lawyers and cases against victims.
Related content
Comments: 11
Oatmeak [2017-02-21 04:12:44 +0000 UTC]
Comparing a rock to a gun is stupid, do you know how difficult it is to kill someone with a rock? If killing someone with a gun was as difficult as killing someone with a rock we wouldn't have a gun problem. Don't believe me? Walk into a school and try to massacre kids with a rock.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jax1776 In reply to Oatmeak [2017-02-21 21:59:17 +0000 UTC]
It's about rage that drives a human to kill another human, no matter what weapon they use. That's what this is about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oatmeak In reply to Jax1776 [2017-02-22 01:13:07 +0000 UTC]
I'm not arguing that you're getting off topic, what I'm arguing is that it's ultimately better for everyone if we make it harder for people to kill each other.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ImdaBatman [2015-12-31 05:56:09 +0000 UTC]
saying gun control stops violence is like saying outlawing spoons will stop obesity
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vader999 In reply to ImdaBatman [2016-08-15 20:37:22 +0000 UTC]
Outlawing spoons won't stop people from gorging on double-baconators and big macs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WickedPrince [2015-07-16 07:17:48 +0000 UTC]
When foul words are made criminal, then only criminals will have foul words.
Mankind has always been able to find ways to harm each other, so it's of course foolish to agree to give up even one single tool that could be used to harm another person. Because those same tools are the only and best way to stop another person from using such a tool. Every shooter who has ever been stopped has been stopped by somebody else with a gun - and more often than not it was NOT a police officer who stopped him. And especially now when the commissioners of major city police precincts are declaring that it's not their duty to protect us civilians, it's their duty to protect our society's laws - which is absurd considering that murder is the highest crime. And this goes directly against every cop car that reads "To serve and protect" - but now they only exist to serve and protect the people with enough money to make a big stink if they screw up.
In Great Britain the medical association has been pushing their House of Lords to criminalize sharp kitchen implements. Because since guns are illegal over there the weapon of choice for most crimes is various types of knives. If you really want to take away the weapon that is most used to cause harm to others, remove everybody's hands.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dragonrider1227 [2015-06-23 01:41:37 +0000 UTC]
I doubt Cain could've killed nine people with a rock. But I do get what you're saying.
I fear the second amendent gets misunderstood a lot. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The "well regulated Militia" part says to me that we have the right to arm and protect ourselves, but that maybe we still require some sort of controlling system and that maybe nutjobs shouldn't get guns as birthday presents.
I mean, I see your point. I really do. But I've seen the other side of this issue. They honestly think that tragedy could've been avoided if everyone at the church had guns. As if we live in a John Wayne movie and we're all John Wayne.
There's gotta be a middle ground somewhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
soulessone12 In reply to Dragonrider1227 [2015-06-23 04:30:14 +0000 UTC]
looks like I'm not the only one with the same thoughts
👍: 0 ⏩: 1