HOME | DD

jbeverlygreene — False Flag In Ukraine Copy

Published: 2014-08-09 12:54:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 767; Favourites: 12; Downloads: 2
Redirect to original
Description notice how the media has stopped talking about "how putin shot down the Malaysian airliner", since it's been debunked as another in a long list of false flags perpetrated by the West.
Related content
Comments: 9

katiejo911 [2015-02-06 06:24:51 +0000 UTC]

I think the whole point of a false flag is that it can not be proven who did it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Neetsfagging322297 [2014-08-12 13:27:10 +0000 UTC]

Liar liar, plane on fire!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

autogestion [2014-08-10 14:57:03 +0000 UTC]

scgnews.com/flight-mh17-what-y…


this was not a normal flight path
it was 300 miles off course
normally planes this flight path keep significantly farther south
and the decision to allow mh17 to fly over donetsk was ultimately the decision of the authorities in kiev


kiev initially claimed that they were acting under the assumption that this route was safe as long as the flight stayed above 32000 feet
which is out of range for man pad surface to air missiles
but that statement was later contradicted by ukraine officials who said they knew three days before the downing of mh17 that the separatists had the buk missile system
which is capable of hitting aircraft at much higher altitudes
so either the ukrainian government is lying about the separatists having the missiles
or they routed flight mh17 300 miles off course
knowing that it could be easily shot down


after russia challenged the u s government to produce the satellite imagery to back up their accusations
what washington released to cnn isn t a recent map at all
in fact the map itself has a date written right on it
2010


russia
on the other hand
has released satellite images
these first two images dated july 14 show buk missile launch systems located about 8 kilometers northwest of the city of lugansk
an area under the control of the ukrainian military


the last image shows them in a new position 5 kilometers north of donetsk


washington has not responded to this information
and interestingly has lowered its tone since


russia also released a radar image showing an su 27 fighter jet in close proximity to flight mh17
ukraine had previously denied that there were any military aircraft near mh17
but they then reversed their story and said that the su 27 was escorting the flight


video later taken down by the bbc shows that eye witnesses saw military aircraft approaching flight mh17 right before the crash

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

Neetsfagging322297 In reply to autogestion [2014-08-12 13:25:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jbeverlygreene In reply to autogestion [2014-08-10 21:28:11 +0000 UTC]

thanks for all that info
plus reports came out that the plane was all shot up! that wasn't from the ground. it was being followed by Ukrainian jets & they were too quick to blame Russia.
bottom line: false flag! I could be wrong, but that's where the evidence leads. qui bono, who profits?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bragon-the-bat In reply to autogestion [2014-08-10 16:59:55 +0000 UTC]

There is a picture reconstituing the Boeing cockpit by a drawing where photographies of the pieces pierced by 30mm bullets are put in.
Seems the pilots has been shot, then (or before) a missile shot in the plane by a fighter jet. Rebels don't have fighter jets. 
Further, I read a few days after the plane was downed that a BUK missile couldn't have done the damages as we see them on the ground as these missiles are designed to hit a plane engine to create an explosion (and fire), and central pieces of the plane aren't charred.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LordXavamros [2014-08-09 18:19:56 +0000 UTC]

Russians have destroyed the evidence so we'll never know the truth.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SamuraiTaiga [2014-08-09 15:38:01 +0000 UTC]

It hasn't been proven that the Russians or the Separatists did it, and the lies from the USA-UK look so idiotic, it should embarrass them

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PosterGuy2014 [2014-08-09 14:48:17 +0000 UTC]

It has not be proven who did it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0