HOME | DD

Published: 2009-12-10 10:30:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 531; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
my new red chucksthey is sexy as,
yes i know its getting to be a bit of a cliche, taking photo's of converse.
but well... get over it
hope you like
_________________________
© A l e x a n d e r | J o h n s o n
you may not use my art without my permission
and if you do, and i find out, ill hunt you down
and kick you, kick you really hard......
...in the shins!
have a nice day
Related content
Comments: 14
JohnsonAlexander150 In reply to eena-rey [2009-12-11 01:40:56 +0000 UTC]
yes, my feet were in ecstasy
i think they had an orgasm
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eena-rey In reply to JohnsonAlexander150 [2009-12-11 06:38:34 +0000 UTC]
but ecstasy isnt good D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JohnsonAlexander150 In reply to eena-rey [2009-12-11 08:49:06 +0000 UTC]
wait... oh, wrong one
extacy*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
philmud [2009-12-10 11:25:02 +0000 UTC]
I love this one- the red is so vibrant & really suits the texture of the chucks. Did you lift the red in photoshop? I'd also be interested to know if you added the blur - I think you did on the green, but the DoF seems way too shallow for an aperture setting of f/32. Did you add blur to the surface of the bottom shoe?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JohnsonAlexander150 In reply to philmud [2009-12-10 11:44:55 +0000 UTC]
thanks
nope, no added blur.
the only editing done was,
sharpening, i sharpened a bit.
and the brightness/contrast, just raised them a little, that is partly why the red is so vibrant.
other than that, its au natural babeh
glad you liked it
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
shortshelly In reply to JohnsonAlexander150 [2010-01-10 22:38:57 +0000 UTC]
You did not just steal my spelling of babeh!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JohnsonAlexander150 In reply to shortshelly [2010-01-12 12:52:38 +0000 UTC]
sorry
may have been talking to you on MSN when i typed it XD
thanks for the fav's shellybelly
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
shortshelly In reply to JohnsonAlexander150 [2010-01-14 10:20:47 +0000 UTC]
LOL
Excuses, excuses
Aww it's cool Panzeh
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
philmud In reply to JohnsonAlexander150 [2009-12-10 11:48:37 +0000 UTC]
Yeh- it's a great shot- think about it- it's hard to make a pair of shoes visually exciting.
I am convinced that the camera settings data for your shots is inaccurate (on the right of your shots DA lists the lens focal length, camera model, shutter speed etc) - there is no way you'd get such shallow DoF with f/32
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JohnsonAlexander150 In reply to philmud [2009-12-11 01:39:47 +0000 UTC]
aww, thanks
i love converse picks
lol, does it make a huge nerd that you can tell if the stats are inacurate from the image
nah, just skilled.
and if the "f/32" the aperture setting.
than your right, my camera will not reach 32.
or it will " A 3.4 F9 " thats what it reads at the top of my screen XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JohnsonAlexander150 In reply to philmud [2009-12-12 05:53:46 +0000 UTC]
tehe, well atleast you know it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0