HOME | DD

jsrgomez — Myself for You

Published: 2013-01-09 13:22:58 +0000 UTC; Views: 15968; Favourites: 416; Downloads: 464
Redirect to original
Description This Lego work is named "Yellow"
The Art of the Brick Exhibit by Nathan Sawaya

The posting of this photo has approval from Mr. Nathan Sawaya, and the photo is owned and taken by myself.
Related content
Comments: 126

Bentheechidna In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 21:07:01 +0000 UTC]

Except it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CotterPasta In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 18:54:13 +0000 UTC]

^^this

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

monkeydluffy1 In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 18:44:58 +0000 UTC]

This is amazing *O* i wonder how many pieces of lego was used XD this must have taken aaaaages *O* absolute masterpiece

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Skelly-Bone In reply to monkeydluffy1 [2013-01-09 20:52:44 +0000 UTC]

It says who it's by in the description, it's not like stealing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bentheechidna In reply to Skelly-Bone [2013-01-09 21:07:28 +0000 UTC]

Except it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

1ma-Luvr-ana-Hater In reply to monkeydluffy1 [2013-01-09 20:45:32 +0000 UTC]

He fucking Googled it! It took him fucking five minutes!!! I could've posted a billion of other peoples pieces, none even this recognizable, but I LIKE being original! It would be comforting to think that I share this affinity with other human beings! (unless it's an imitation that he created, in which case he should have said it was a copy so he's not stealing)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Skelly-Bone In reply to 1ma-Luvr-ana-Hater [2013-01-09 20:52:39 +0000 UTC]

It says who it's by in the description, it's not like stealing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bentheechidna In reply to Skelly-Bone [2013-01-09 21:07:34 +0000 UTC]

Except it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

1ma-Luvr-ana-Hater In reply to Bentheechidna [2013-02-11 00:51:06 +0000 UTC]

I could SWEAR that description was not there when I first saw it. I suppose I could have over looked it, but I think I remember checking for any mention of the original artist before I called shenanigans. That would probably include checking the description. please correct me either way... I am confused.
Also, if I was incorrect in my assumption, I seriously am sorry for blaming jsrgomez, the photographer, for theft. My apologies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gandallff In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 18:43:13 +0000 UTC]

Can I has?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NHLoveDani In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 18:37:12 +0000 UTC]

This is spectacular. Great job *v* wow. I have no words, really...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Skelly-Bone In reply to NHLoveDani [2013-01-09 20:52:58 +0000 UTC]

It says who it's by in the description

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

NHLoveDani In reply to Skelly-Bone [2013-01-10 00:47:57 +0000 UTC]

I saw :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Skelly-Bone In reply to NHLoveDani [2013-01-10 00:50:47 +0000 UTC]

Your profile picture is so precious ;^;

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NHLoveDani In reply to Skelly-Bone [2013-01-10 00:55:23 +0000 UTC]

Awww thank you *V* >//v//<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Skelly-Bone In reply to NHLoveDani [2013-01-10 00:57:28 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome /)u(\

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bentheechidna In reply to Skelly-Bone [2013-01-09 21:07:47 +0000 UTC]

And it's stolen.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Skelly-Bone In reply to Bentheechidna [2013-01-09 21:16:07 +0000 UTC]

Stealing is taking credit for someone's work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

magty In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 18:34:44 +0000 UTC]

very beautifull

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wmCONCEPTS In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 18:30:10 +0000 UTC]

very cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

XxAutoconxX In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 18:20:30 +0000 UTC]

Honestly this is really cool.. D:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Erinsama In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 17:44:21 +0000 UTC]

Really evocative

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sorodisi In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 15:55:01 +0000 UTC]

amazinggggg~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Paulina135 In reply to ??? [2013-01-09 13:23:23 +0000 UTC]

I love it<3<3<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jsrgomez In reply to Paulina135 [2013-01-09 13:24:35 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |