HOME | DD

k-a-i-s-r:blank:

Published: 2010-02-24 01:27:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 7975; Favourites: 365; Downloads: 87
Redirect to original
Description To honor the awesomeness that is , I made a revamp of it and (still practicing muh shading technique) here it is!

Original belongs to `weaponzero

**EDIT: Now with no hands**
Related content
Comments: 195

wisekidk [2010-06-22 23:12:50 +0000 UTC]

Ok, I can understand why people are so mad that this is a DD. It's only a revamp. It's only reshading. There are many more emotes worthy of becoming a DD.

In a way I can relate to them. This only a simple reshading.

But it's awesome. Yes, there are many more pieces that deserve DD's. Those will get DD's too.

People need to learn... just to shut up and let people have their special day.

I do quite like this. I understand the pain of reshading. Finding a shading style was such a pain for me. Should I go with pastels, or with extremely shiny? ect.

I do like this much better. You got rid of the annoying nose that the other one had, and I like how the mouth is much higher than the other one. It is more of which is (kinda) what I do when I go

I love the little blink, and the shading is extremely nice.

I do agree that this should get a DD, but I can still understand why people are not over enthustiastic.

But fantastic job. Me likey

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

somastardust [2010-03-05 20:34:37 +0000 UTC]

people are getting out of hand, but i really like this emote and would like to see it as a plz account
and i think it makes for a fine DD. i've seen worse, but i don't bitch about it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to somastardust [2010-03-07 21:04:04 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I appreciate it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

somastardust In reply to k-a-i-s-r [2010-03-08 01:46:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arrioch [2010-03-04 20:02:40 +0000 UTC]

Awesome, i'm glad it still has the same stare, despite the changes.

REPLACE NAO!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to arrioch [2010-03-04 20:18:46 +0000 UTC]

lol thank you but I don't know how to replace so I'll go with a plz account

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

arrioch In reply to k-a-i-s-r [2010-03-04 23:07:42 +0000 UTC]

lol, i meant for dA staff to replace it
plz account, yes!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to arrioch [2010-03-05 00:23:30 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure if they have time, I mean they're busy with important stuff and whatnot lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Paganfox [2010-03-04 08:01:53 +0000 UTC]

I think it's funny how many comment on the shading. Yet have not pointed out that you actually made it blink. I think it looks better blinking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to Paganfox [2010-03-04 14:56:05 +0000 UTC]

it's the animation that barely counts lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arcademan10 [2010-03-04 05:50:31 +0000 UTC]

congrats on the DD!

Flaming idiots... They shouldn't do that to you. From the FAQ 873: "In severe cases, if you "flame" or harass a featured artist, you may be banned." Looks like they've flamed a bit too much, in my opinion.

But still congrats!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to arcademan10 [2010-03-04 14:57:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks and you're right they should be banned for flaming, but it's not really high-level flaming so I'd just ignore or reply, ehhh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

arcademan10 In reply to k-a-i-s-r [2010-03-04 16:20:53 +0000 UTC]

you can hide their messages, but that'll make it worse...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to arcademan10 [2010-03-04 16:35:11 +0000 UTC]

How so?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

arcademan10 In reply to k-a-i-s-r [2010-03-04 16:50:12 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to arcademan10 [2010-03-04 16:51:05 +0000 UTC]

lol no one knows.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

arcademan10 In reply to k-a-i-s-r [2010-03-04 17:35:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ManiacalMuffin [2010-03-04 05:34:58 +0000 UTC]

Congrats on the DD

People who judge and whine obviously don't know the first thing about making emotes and how difficult shading them can be, and how amazingly you've shaded this one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to ManiacalMuffin [2010-03-04 15:04:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot it sure is.

Btw, I love you Dancing gallery, especially `Droneguard 's. Tell me, was it hard to make?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ManiacalMuffin In reply to k-a-i-s-r [2010-03-05 06:31:31 +0000 UTC]

My pleasure.

And thank you
Droneguard's was a little trickier than the rest because I had to coordinate all the different parts but in the end it wasn't too bad

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to ManiacalMuffin [2010-03-05 13:51:58 +0000 UTC]

Yeah it was hard to make him too just look at it! [link] I got it done though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Netbug009 [2010-03-04 05:06:05 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure how I feel about blank emote blinking; I almost found it funnier/creepier when it was static. Still, this is a very nicely done emote. Great shading. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to Netbug009 [2010-03-04 15:07:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZSW13 [2010-03-04 04:43:12 +0000 UTC]

Okay...I once commented on a deviation saying it doesn't deserve a DD, but an administrator explained to me a DD is not an award but a feature, and only now do I see how fucking stupid I looked. I'm glad I learned my lesson, I don't have to be grouped with these dumbfucks anymore.

As much as I usually don't like DD's featured that are simply redone versions of something else, I like this one. The emoticon is one of my personal favourites and it's nice to see a redux of it. The new shading makes it look softer and I noticed the orangish shade is a bit darker and less straining.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to ZSW13 [2010-03-04 15:12:41 +0000 UTC]

Amen to that, and thanks. I tried to not to screw up with this one and after minutes of thinking about the shading color, I just threw it in.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

metalgearhead123 [2010-03-04 04:14:58 +0000 UTC]

If you cocks don't thik it is deserving just click this FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature? and stop spamming your crap here.

Its incredibly assholeish of you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to metalgearhead123 [2010-03-04 15:09:06 +0000 UTC]

Thank you...?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

metalgearhead123 In reply to k-a-i-s-r [2010-03-06 02:58:43 +0000 UTC]

people seem to think there complaints are entertaining

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

raeraychan [2010-03-04 04:05:49 +0000 UTC]

Congrats! I like the shading .

For the people who are blaming the artist for getting the DD it's not really like they asked for it. So stop being trolls and jerks and get a life.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

k-a-i-s-r In reply to raeraychan [2010-03-04 15:09:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dewzilla [2010-03-04 03:31:31 +0000 UTC]

I... really don't see why this is a DD?

I have nothing against the picture itself but it seems odd to feature a emoticon that already existed and was simply shaded when there are so many amazing things on this website that have yet to be DD'd.

Oh well. .-. I do like the shading.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

k-a-i-s-r In reply to Dewzilla [2010-03-04 15:18:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dewzilla In reply to k-a-i-s-r [2010-03-04 16:18:24 +0000 UTC]

<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

metalgearhead123 In reply to Dewzilla [2010-03-04 04:12:57 +0000 UTC]

FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dewzilla In reply to metalgearhead123 [2010-03-04 04:34:27 +0000 UTC]

I wasn't being rude or anything, so don't go shoving rules I ALREADY KNOW ABOUT In my face.

Kthnx. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

metalgearhead123 In reply to Dewzilla [2010-03-04 09:26:49 +0000 UTC]

are you sure?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dewzilla In reply to metalgearhead123 [2010-03-04 16:17:49 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I'm quite sure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

metalgearhead123 In reply to Dewzilla [2010-03-06 03:00:10 +0000 UTC]

well prehaps you didn't understand it try reading it again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dewzilla In reply to metalgearhead123 [2010-03-06 03:11:04 +0000 UTC]

Well, perhaps you need to calm the hell down?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

metalgearhead123 In reply to Dewzilla [2010-03-10 01:48:14 +0000 UTC]

oh i think im pretty calm lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dewzilla In reply to metalgearhead123 [2010-03-10 03:01:27 +0000 UTC]

Ahuh.

Calm down more.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VanillaBeast In reply to Dewzilla [2010-03-04 03:35:40 +0000 UTC]

The same reason why you see a big titted blonde that can barely talk in complete sentences get promoted to Vice President of a company... Favortism.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Dewzilla In reply to VanillaBeast [2010-03-04 04:36:34 +0000 UTC]

.. So lovely. .-. But yes, true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

metalgearhead123 In reply to VanillaBeast [2010-03-04 04:13:03 +0000 UTC]

FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VanillaBeast [2010-03-04 03:12:27 +0000 UTC]

I'm going to go take a huge crap on my front lawn and take a picture, add a little shading to it and I bet it gets a DD from this catluvr2 joker.

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

k-a-i-s-r In reply to VanillaBeast [2010-03-04 14:39:20 +0000 UTC]

good luck

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ManiacalMuffin In reply to VanillaBeast [2010-03-04 05:34:04 +0000 UTC]

Before you judge, I would honestly like to see you try to shade an emote this well

Just because the piece is small, doesn't mean it didn't take time, effort and talent. Shading emotes this well can be one of the most difficult concepts of creating them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HaDou-Ken In reply to ManiacalMuffin [2010-03-11 17:38:14 +0000 UTC]

Agree, the emote shading make me, DIE!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dewzilla In reply to VanillaBeast [2010-03-04 03:25:25 +0000 UTC]

Even if it's mean, it still made me laugh. xD;

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

metalgearhead123 In reply to VanillaBeast [2010-03-04 03:15:21 +0000 UTC]

what a shitty thing to say...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>