HOME | DD

Published: 2007-10-24 19:33:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 1411; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Xenodream, using a Sierpinsky basis.I like how it's clean and almost carved.
XenoDream • Inkscape for frame and text.
Related content
Comments: 17
fractalhead [2008-01-05 22:12:50 +0000 UTC]
.....that is really cool!!!....splendid bit of work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mintyfresh [2007-10-29 21:02:44 +0000 UTC]
Definitely looks carved; the lighting is so effective!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fraxa [2007-10-28 22:59:32 +0000 UTC]
I love this image and have featured it in my journal this week. [link]
I do hope you don't mind but it you would prefer me to not show your work please let me know and I'll remove it immediately.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WiseWanderer [2007-10-25 10:16:36 +0000 UTC]
Yep, it's a great 3D representation of a Sierpinski curve!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fraxa [2007-10-24 19:48:26 +0000 UTC]
I've always fancied having a go with Xenodream - fractals like this are one of the reasons why - but I've heard it's really hard to master and I have enough trouble with UF and Apo. I like this a lot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kaeltyk In reply to Fraxa [2007-10-24 19:58:11 +0000 UTC]
Thank you !
Xenodream is easier if you have knowledge of 3D software, and even being an old 3D artist there was a lot to learn to know what I was doing . I also bought UF at the same time, and I wouldn't say it is easier or harder to learn following the tutorials. Maybe because I'm not used to layering as I don't use Photoshop a lot.
At least it's different.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fraxa In reply to Kaeltyk [2007-10-24 20:15:43 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for that info - I'm not very good with 3D - I've had a got with Bryce but not all that successfully - perhaps I'll just stick to what I know
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mistywisp [2007-10-24 19:39:22 +0000 UTC]
So clever! I have Xendream and I can't do a thing with it - I don't have a clue! This is really lovely - it's good to know what the software CAN do!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kaeltyk In reply to mistywisp [2007-10-24 19:48:23 +0000 UTC]
Thank you !
I just started XenoDream, and it was confusing (Holons, weird render method, so much parameters...) until I ran half of the 'usingXD2' pdf file found on the site. Now I start to know what I'm doing using basics, I still have a lot to see according to the document. And it's so good to see something else than Apophysis .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mistywisp In reply to Kaeltyk [2007-10-25 03:14:20 +0000 UTC]
You're very brave, Eric! I'll stick with my feeble attempts at Ultra Fractal for now! Problem is, I keep getting frustrated and it's too easy to go back to Apophysis!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0