HOME | DD
KaijuSamurai β Kaiju Combat - Macrosaurus
Published: 2012-11-10 03:37:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 63822; Favourites: 1165; Downloads: 1059
Redirect to original
Description
[link]Anyway. This is one of the monsters created for Kaiju Combat!
Info found here:
[link]
Related content
Comments: 150
π: 3 β©: 0
π: 4 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 0
So what we have here is a big, fat, transdimensional T.Rex that eats everything in sight...did I miss something?
π: 1 β©: 0
its funy cause its a fetish thing and nobody figured it out
π: 3 β©: 0
Is this your sketch by the way, just wondering?
π: 0 β©: 1
He remindes me of Erl Pug Sinclair from Jim Henson & Disney's Dinosaurs. But wider on both side, and with out a pluad sheet. And no Baby Sinclair beating him on the head He-he-he!
π: 0 β©: 1
Great minds think alike
π: 0 β©: 0
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntPu1Vβ¦
Eat all the Diabeetus
π: 0 β©: 0
And Macrosaurus looks exactly like a giant fat t-rex. Seriously, the humans gave him too much steroids and Mcdonalds XDD
π: 0 β©: 1
whoa! someone needs to go on a diet! sheesh!
π: 0 β©: 0
There are 6 levels
Skinny,Healthy,Fat,Fluffy,Dayum, and Oh hell no.
This is beyond any of those.
π: 1 β©: 0
Looks like Jurassic Park Fed their T-rexes too much goats.(and steroids)
π: 0 β©: 0
That looks like a Foothill Transit bus in Mac's mouth to me, and yes I was on those buses.
Am I the only one that knows it's Macroceli over on FA? Probably not.
π: 0 β©: 0
He's got a big head, and little arms //shot
I love this though it looks awesome
this is the weirdest comments section ive ever been in like wtf
π: 0 β©: 1
Big head and little arms. I'm not sure how well this plan was thought through.
...
...Master?
π: 0 β©: 0
Anyone else find it odd that a character literally designed to be fat-fetish porn is in this game?
π: 0 β©: 1
Fat-fetish-furry porn.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, just fat fetish porn. Seriously, not all non-human porn is furry related.
π: 1 β©: 1
By definition, it sort of is, by being non-human.
π: 0 β©: 1
Non-human =/= Furry. If it was pornography of a generic green alien with big eyes and no animal features, would you consider THAT furry porn? Macrosaurus is designed just with the fat aspect in mind, not any form of "furry" idea or anything.
π: 0 β©: 1
Pretty sure any anthropomorphic animal in a fetish context counts as a furry, is macrosaurus anthropomorphic?
π: 0 β©: 1
No. Bipedal =/= Anthro. He's also not an animal.
π: 0 β©: 1
You do realize that Macrosaurus is based on the character belonging to Macroceli, and that he's on furaffinity.net, and has a fursuit and everything.
π: 0 β©: 2
this coversatation is old but i like how it almost became a flamwar
π: 0 β©: 0
So? Doesn't technically make it furry. Please stop with your whole "anti-furry" ranting please.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm pretty sure that if there is a fursuit of something, it's a furry. This guy has a whole gallery full of macro/fat fetish furry art on his fur-affinity page, and Macrosaurus is clearly based on his character.
What is YOUR definition of a furry, then? Pretty sure an anthropomorphic animal in a vaguely sexual context is the only technical requirement for being considered a furry. You keep shifting the goalposts. I wasn't anti-furry ranting as such, you said it was fat and macro fetish, I simply stated that it was also furry, which it is. After that, you kept denying that it was furry, and I had to have the last word, because I'm stubborn. I have not at any point been explicitly hateful or anti furry, my original comment was negative, but this whole comment thread has been about proving you wrong, not being anti-furry.
π: 0 β©: 1
WHO CARES!? Ugh, you're basically just lumping all furries together by insisting it's furry porn, when it's NOT EVEN RELEVANT! The only thing relevant is that it's a fat fetish character.
If you're not anti-furry ranting, then why buy into stereotypes. "Furry" doesn't have to be even remotely sexual, for starters. Furry is someone who likes and draws anthropomorphic animals, WHETHER THEY DRAW THEM SUGGESTIVELY OR NOT! Not to mention the fact that you MUST insist it's furry, which Macrosaur himself really isn't (Even if the dude himself is a furry, the character isn't), shows that yes you ARE anti-furry. You're not proving ANYONE wrong, you're just being a douch-bag. Who care's if it's furry or not, all that matters is that it's fat fetish. Going ANY FURTHER THAN THAT is just stereotyping. Now shut up and get off my case. God!
π: 0 β©: 1
So you're telling me off for insisting it's furry, and then keep insisting that the fat fetish side of it is all that matters. So you're kind of showing a double standard by stereotyping fat fetishism, you hypocrite. Why is that "all that matters?"
I am of the opinion that any sexualized anthropomorphic animal is "furry" and any non sexualized one is "anthro", this was the definition when I first came onto DA about 7 years ago.
The Macrosaur Kaiju is not furry, but the fat fetish dinosaur character it's based on, by Macroceli, is clearly furry.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, I'm not a hypocrite, because just saying "Fat fetish" doesn't stereotype any group in particular, since it is indigenous to no group in particular, many different people have fat fetishes, NOT just SOME furries. Calling it "furry" fetish IS stereotyping because you're putting an actual group of people under a label. It really isn't a double standard OR hypocrisy.
No, any anthropomorphic animal, sexualized or not, is anthro/furry. Technically a furry is the guy who draws anthros, not the anthros themselves, and they do NOT need to draw sexualized furries.
Again, who cares? Like I said, by tacking on "furry fetish" to it, you're generalizing. You don't realize how offensive that can be that furries cannot go ANYWHERE without people acting like all furries are into yiff and porn? Because it's not fun always being put under that label. It's fat fetish, leave it at that or shut the **** up: PERIOD.
π: 0 β©: 1
Except, the furry that THIS character is based on DOES fetishize his characters, so it technically is fetish furry art. I'm not saying that all furries are fetish, I'm saying that some furries portray fetish or sexual content of their characters.
π: 0 β©: 1
If you're not stereotyping, then shut up about it! Is it that hard to understand that some furries do NOT appreciate being put under that label? The character itself is not "Furry" fetish, just fat fetish, leave it at that or shut the **** up.
Also, porn is not indigenous to furries.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>