HOME | DD

KesslerProtus — Rotor internal combustion engine concept 2T2R3Ch by

#3d #alter #animation #combustion #ice #internal #rotary #rotor #alternative #amateur #blender #concept #conceptart #conceptdesign #conceptual #engine #engineering #blenderrender #blendercycles #blender3dcycles
Published: 2020-07-04 14:51:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 607; Favourites: 5; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Rotor internal combustion engine concept 2T2R3Ch (type 2 of rotor and hull, 2 section and rotor, 3 chambers in each)


I have no idea if it will work at all.

Maybe I'm wrong and it will never work.

I have no engineering education, so it's just my imagination.


Since the gas pressure is the same in all directions, but the force depends on the surface area, the rotor must rotate in the direction of the larger area.

Gas compression occurs outside the engine itself, outside its chambers.
The compressor can be activated both by the rotor, and by the exhaust gases (turbocompressor, turbocharger).

The division of the motor into chambers is quite abstract and is the same as the division in the Wankel engine - provided by seals at the external surface of the rotor (not contacting with engine hull, only seals contact).

Combustion chambers can be cooled by radiators that are part of the engine housing (not shown in the animation).

This concept uses two rotors, they are rotated relative to each other and around a common axis by 180 degrees. This creates a double effect on the rotation of the rotor in one direction with a small diameter of the rotor.


Forced ventilation of the exhaust chamber may be required ( by turbocompressor, turbocharger).


I assume that it can work from simply supplying compressed gas to the "fuel intake chamber". But the power will be small. In addition, you need to spend part of the energy on gas compression, so it is better to consider it as a partial compensation for energy losses on gas compression.

Related content
Comments: 2

Witsude [2020-07-04 20:26:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KesslerProtus In reply to Witsude [2020-07-04 23:25:32 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0