HOME | DD
KimJSinclair β Untitled
Published: 2010-03-16 03:28:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 26321; Favourites: 1614; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
My images are not stock so please do not alter them in any way without my consent, thank you.Related content
Comments: 197
Yayyy,like a porcelain doll 
π: 0 β©: 1
My pleasure ^__^.
π: 0 β©: 0
She reminds me of a mix between a geisha and a porcelain doll.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hopefully a good comparison?
π: 0 β©: 0
So weird, I want to sing at it but I don't think it can hear me.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm just a little confused with this comment, sorry.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thank you.
π: 0 β©: 0
I love it. The flawless symmetry of the face really spotlights the doll-like perfection. The only part that bothers me is the hair, it seems...very synthetic and out of place.
Otherwise, awesome.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you & thanks for your honesty.
π: 0 β©: 1
It looks so perfect though! Very doll-like.
π: 0 β©: 0
This is awesome! wow kim you look amazingly pretty 
By the way peeps there is no way this is a manipulation. Photomanipulations are images that have been composed of two or more photographic elements.
There has been some editing to the original which gives the photo something very different to the normal. Like playing with the lighting!
Anyway i think its a great photo and a top job!
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you.
At least someone agrees with me about the category aha.
π: 0 β©: 0
the photoshop is done wonderfully !
i love the color tones
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you. There seems to be a bit of controversy on this image because of the editing but at least the editingβs been done, as you say, wonderfully. I appreciate it.
π: 0 β©: 0
I must say, that this took my breath away. Instant favorite. Nicely done.
π: 0 β©: 1
This doesn't look like photography, slight editing in colors are acceptable but this is full photo manipulation, It doesn't even look real. I would have put that under Photo manipulation for sure, not photography.
π: 0 β©: 2
I'm just going to say what I said to someone else.
Sorry, but I'd have to disagree. It's edited but not as far as being a manipulation. When browsing the galleries the little 'i' next to Photomanipulation states, "Photomanipulations are images that have been composed of two or more photographic elements to create something new."
I haven't used more than one image so technically it's not a manipulation.
Here's the original if you'd like to see it:
Click here for the original image.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ok...understandable but;
Definition of photography;
Photography is the skill, job, or process of producing photographs.
Definition of photograph;
A photograph is a picture that is made using a camera.
What you're doing is more digital art then actual photography. Photography is simply using a camera. You're using much more then a camera. You're manipulating the photo into your liking, this which is, photo manipulation ( very good in this case ).
------------------------------------
On a second note the definition on photo manipulation is;
Photo manipulation is the application of image editing techniques to photograph in order to create an illusion or deception
You're making the illusion of perfection, making it photo manipulation. This is more digital art, less photography
By the way the original is quite beautiful.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ok I understand your point but I'm just going by the definitions used on DeviantArt, after all it is the site I've submitted it on.
& thank you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well I cannot control where you put your content, and your opinion on the matter is your opinion but I still think its more photo manipulation then photography
and you're welcome
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually, photographers have manipulated their works from the beginning. Photoshop is just a digital dark room, so this is basically photography, not photo-manipulation.
π: 0 β©: 0
By the way I'm not saying it looks bad, it looks great but wrong category in this kids opinion
π: 0 β©: 0
She really reminds me of snow white.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hopefully that's good?
π: 0 β©: 1
it was edited but it turned out to be fantastic.
good job
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh my God, you look like a doll!
Perfect!
π: 0 β©: 1
She's beautiful. Just stunning. Very crisp and clear. Kinda amazing.
π: 0 β©: 1
Perfect. And flawless. Amamzing.
π: 0 β©: 1
This is nice, but it's heavily manipulated. I wouldn't consider it photography. It's a photo manipulation.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry, but I'd have to disagree. It's edited but not as far as being a manipulation. When browsing the galleries the little 'i' next to Photomanipulation states, "Photomanipulations are images that have been composed of two or more photographic elements to create something new."
I haven't used more than one image so technically it's not a manipulation.
π: 0 β©: 1
You've manipulated the original photo and it's deceptive to call it a photograph. Nobody looks like that. I'd like to see what the original actually looks like. We can agree to disagree.
π: 0 β©: 1
I still think it's not a manipulation since I haven't used more than one image. Take a look at the original & you'll see I've only changed colours along with very few touch-ups on hair & makeup.
Click here for the original image.
Now be honest, the most dramatic difference is the change in colours, does that really technically make this a manipulation?
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks for showing me the original. Most people will not do that. I based my definition of Photo Manipulation from wikipedia.
"Photo manipulation is the application of image editing techniques to photographs in order to create an illusion or deception (in contrast to mere enhancement or correction), through analog or digital means.[1] Its uses, cultural impact, and ethical concerns have made it a subject of interest beyond the technical process and skills involved."
You are correct about DA's definition of a photomanipulation.
The image you edited has more than a few touch ups. She no longer has freckles or blemishes. There is no more roundness underneath her eyes to show the fact that there are eyeballs under her eyelids. The sides of the nose has lost a lot of it's form making the face is more flat than the original. The creases on both sides of her lips have been removed. Now the lips float on top of the chin and look superimposed. It also appears you have painted the lips to look smoother.
DeviantART's description of Photography is this:
"Photographs taken with a film of digital camera featuring a minimal amount of color and exposure adjustment."
Maybe deviantART needs a different system of labeling the work that you do. Don't get me wrong, your work is very well done. I just don't think it is right to label it "Photography" when you have altered the image so dramatically.
π: 0 β©: 1
I understand your point however I personally feel it doesn't belong under manipulation.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you.
I'm not quite this pale in real life though.
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>