HOME | DD
KnightDigital — Bambi and Hunter
[NSFW]
Published: 2008-04-25 15:20:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 33849; Favourites: 841; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Bambi and Nikki Hunter..Shot this for a client few years back.Many of you will know both models.
Related content
Comments: 42
yeah... 2 girls, who re attractive, no denying that. open legged, boobs out and one is goin for the others boob with her tongue
da saddens me these days.
this stuffs meant for x rated sites. Is da slowly becoming a lease for free (in this case softcore) porn images?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I will reload the same image without her breast showing....but then again that would not be deviant art now would it....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yay for people jumping on the '
If people are going to jump on the '
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Not entirely correct. I've noticed this sort of stuff cropping up alot recently. Nude photography is usually about the beauty of the human form, using lighting and shadow or colour to accentuate the shapes, textures and parts of the human body. You are correct in saying that the nude form is erotic, of course it is. And i agree with you on terms of this image being vibrant in colour, of good quality and is well composed. But the content, whats happening within the image is pornographic.
The left models' legs are wide spread, and her breasts are out of her bikini. The right model's legs are also wide spread and she's got her tongue out near the other models breast, which is like she's gonna lick it.
Both models have a look of lust on their faces, you can tell by the eyes.
These are things that aren't usually found in Nude photography, if you actually looked trough the Nude Gallery you'll see that the photographer tends to focus more on the composition of the body within the image.
For example = [link]
The only problem is with nude photography there's a thin borederline of what people deem as "artistic"
Don't get me wrong, the models are attractive. But this type of photography isn't meant for deviantART. Unless they've added a porn gallery.
I only comment on this because, it's disappointing to see that images like these can be found in the Popular section of the DA homepage.
And the point of this community is to discuss and critique and comment on the deviations that are submitted to it.
Conclusion = Nude art is not always porn + Porn is not always artistic
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This if from a series of about 15 images that I did for a promo, the shot before this she had her top on with almost the exact same pose I am going to upload thet and replace this image..It should be under commercial as it was for a client..but what ever if this is porn so be it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yeah i like the colors too 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I once seen these 2 girls in a porno with a couple of horny monkeys and Zebras.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
when did deviant art become a porno site? this is ridiculous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
hm, I agree with nozo...this looks like straight up porn to me. none of the comments are about anything artistic, just how hot the models are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
so hot models make it porn?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thanks its just an old pro shot I did for a client
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's a little sad to see that DA is becoming more of a porn site nowadays.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
lol..ok SO tell me what is porn about this? Because they are good looking girls? Because her breast are showing? Because of their faces??
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
the one on the left needs to take some shot for me in front of my car lol this is mad hot tho nice work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The one on the left is nice; the one on the right scares me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EEEK! I'm Kaballah Juden Dude! LOL No offense taken
Menage a Trois the flavor of the month 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol..never meant to offend
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
To be honest I thought this was going to be one of your nature shots, when I read the title.
lol
Nontheless it's nice and hot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
