HOME | DD
KTWizard β Stop Abusing Sex Stamp
Published: 2010-06-08 14:26:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 5192; Favourites: 185; Downloads: 32
Redirect to original
Description
Rather simple compared to my other stamps, but this one has a message.It was request by my AmorissimΓͺ Puella, but this is a message we both agree on. Sex has become the equivalent to daily walks or conversations. People treat it as if it's nothing more than another outlet of for pleasure.
True, but it's so much more than that. It's a union of body and soul between two people, and act that can create new life. Something so sacred that some people (ME!) wait until marriage just to do it!
Seriously, there is a limit.
Related content
Comments: 370
What, the 'Brain in a Vat' theory? Platonian ideals should stay where they came from, in Antiquity.
π: 0 β©: 1
This world is a lie. That is all.
π: 0 β©: 1
Give me your... evidences Β¬_Β¬
π: 0 β©: 1
Please stop. When you die you'll die and be dead and everything. You won't see anything
π: 0 β©: 1
And you are happy with believing that...?
π: 0 β©: 1
Just, please stop, you are embarrassing.
π: 0 β©: 1
You cannot disprove something just because you have not experienced it.
You do not know that there is no afterlife.
π: 0 β©: 1
You remember the last time you experienced non-life?
Before you were born. Stop ejaculating pseudo-philosophy
π: 0 β©: 1
I do not.
Stop believing that you can prove that something does not exist anywhere.
For example you cannot prove that there are no dragons in this universe.
π: 0 β©: 1
Please stop. As a philosophy student, you're 'oh so philosophic' questioning of proofs are very stunted.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm nearly 12 and I find sex very very inresting I dont abuse it (even though I'm a child you would expect me to)
π: 0 β©: 1
You're right, I do expect you to. To not have it at least. That's literally illegal. In all states. And countries.
Who the hell is encouraging you?
π: 0 β©: 2
I once heard from a friend that they allow 13 year olds to have sex in Sweden...
π: 0 β©: 2
Japan is the only place I know that is allowed.
π: 0 β©: 1
Really? 
π: 0 β©: 1
I have never read about Saudi Arabia, nor do I intend to learn anything about it.
Islam = Not having opinions/a self/individuality.
π: 0 β©: 1
Understandable, I respect that.
π: 0 β©: 1
They even say: "How can we have opinions when it is all written down?".
π: 0 β©: 1
If you have ever tried to read the Bible you should remember the degree of headache it gave.
But the Quran is much worse.
The best way to compare the Bible and the Quran is to say: At least the Bible has a plot.
π: 0 β©: 0
no one is encouraging me I just feel that way about it, but yeah I never did actually do it...
π: 0 β©: 1
thank god for that
π: 0 β©: 0
It's things like these that make me feel that America's almost turning into a theocracy. And I don't consider that a good thing.
π: 0 β©: 0
Why should certain people have to be united in the eyes of a God they don't believe in or believe hates them, in the case of marriage? Maybe some people are against the entire concept, or maybe some people genuinely feel like they're ready. What's wrong with that? Yes, there's a limit, but your idea of what the limit should be is ridiculous.
π: 0 β©: 1
Saving sex until you love someone... yeah totally ridiculous, we should all just go out and have sex with all of our friends once daily. Why stop there? Let's also do it with the first person we think looks hot.
Just as your sick of people like me being against the abuse of sex, I'm sick of people like you saying that it doesn't matter. I have facts, documented researched facts, that say otherwise. Next to increasing happiness and literally encouraging married couples to say together, people who do so tend to be more focused on their work or business and maintain a higher atmosphere of confidence for a greater portion of their life. People who do abuse it, like try and have it near daily, live shorter, fall out of relationships faster, and tend to focus more on a physical realm.
Now please, walk, jog, or run away, and don't talk to me again.
π: 0 β©: 2
Old comment but, I agree with you so much and you cracked me up. You are so right. x)
π: 0 β©: 0
Ah, the classic 'MY GOD IS THE BEST GOD EVER' defense of, 'If you love somebody you have to marry them or it doesn't count', I see. Good to know your arguments aren't just ridiculous religious prattle an- Oh no wait sorry, they totally are. You can love somebody without having to marry them, you imbecile- As I said, some people are against the concept, and other people, (See: John Barrowman) don't feel they have to be united in the eyes of a religion that hates them.
And your facts and documented research are, I'm afraid to say, either non existent or not reliable, because there isn't a fact on this entire earth that says that Sex is for some reason bad for you if you don't adhere to the strict morals you obviously hold so dearly (and blindly). There are, however, a hell of a lot of studies and arguments suggesting Sex is one of the best forms of bonding and exercise. So your 'Documented research facts' are totally null, and just claiming you have them alone makes your argument ridiculous.
Because no, they don't live shorter lives, and no, they don't fall out of relationships faster, mainly because, A) Sex is scientifically proven to be good for you, and unlike you, I'll be happy to provide links and references, and B) If Sex encourages falling outs, then your idea of being married before having it just makes the idea of marriage tedious, as a wedding ring alone doesn't forge some chain of love. It's simply a wedding ring, a gesture. And in case you haven't noticed yet, the idea of marriage being beneficial is an subject dominated entirely by opinion, not your 'Documented Facts'. Please, go and research your argument, actually start giving a damn and retort with something worth reading, because your answer was basically denial incarnate.
And no, I wont 'walk, jog or run away', because I'm willing to discuss this, unlike you, in your... almost pitifully obvious state of denial. Feel free to ignore this if you want, I don't particularly care, but if you do reply? I'm replying right back.
π: 0 β©: 1
Apparently you didn't read to well the end of my message, so I'll say it again just for emphasis, cause MY god knows you need more of it.
I am SICK of people like YOU telling me I'm wrong all the time. If I'm so wrong for believing what I do, then what makes you any better for believing what you do? Can you even realize with that one track mind of yours that you are literally giving me a circular argument? I'm wrong because my faith isn't anything to base my morals off of, but then you turn around and say that you're right BECAUSE my faith says it. Or maybe it's just that you prefer it. I honestly can't tell, but either way, they are either equal to or LESS than the reasons I'm giving.
And no documentation? Please. Did you even look, or did you assume that this "preacher of god" just spewed out some information. Honestly, I'm kinda looking at you as a "preacher against god" doing just that.
Let me try this again, just to really hammer in that nail. I am NOT making my stance something based upon "I'm right your wrong." I am basing it on experiences past, lessons learned, observation of friends and my own family, and even, yes, the bible. And just in case you have it in the back of your mind that I've grown up sheltered and protected so my opinion is therefore invalid, let me clear that up to. My parents got a divorce because my father was having affairs, multiple affairs. I was 12 at the time. I was living between my mother and father for seven years with her trying to teach me to love regardless of the flaws and my dad having different women in the home almost every time I had to stay there. My brother followed my dad's methods to living, and now he's a bit of an alcoholic and college drop out. Who do you think I chose to follow?
And talk about it? Just read the other like 6 people who have tried to argue this point. If I have to do this on AND off the internet constantly, of course I'll snap like this. If that's the victory you want, fine, you have it. I'm pissed and angry at the world around me so you must be the better man.
One more time. Don't respond. Let me be. I have too much going on around me as it is to have the 1 pillar left in my life be challenged directly like this.
π: 0 β©: 0
Love isn't an excuse?
Love is the very reason most people even have sex.
Holy shit.
Are all of you anti-sex people virgins?
If not, you're all ignorant.
Love doesn't make someone a whore.
π: 0 β©: 1
What... the hell...
I can't tell if your as ignorant as you claim me to be or if your just mental defect. When the hell did I say having sex is bad? We would DIE as species without it. What I'm against is the LOVELESS fucking people do just to feel good, the glorification that it's that matters in life, that having is a right of passage to some hormonal teen.
Who's a whore? Did I even say that?
π: 0 β©: 1
Not you.
What you replied to wasn't even meant for you.
π: 0 β©: 0
hello theres a thing called rape??? and child molestationΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
Rape is forced sexual penetration, not quite the same as sex, as sex is consensual. Also, molestation doesn't usually involve penetration, so it wouldn't count as abused sex. If it did lead to penetration, it would be rape.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
actually yes it can smart ass
look it up
π: 0 β©: 0
Shh...
If you listen closely you can hear a SA Meeting in the distance.
π: 0 β©: 1
EXACTLY.
It's so abused nowadays, to where now kids are doing it.
Humans know nothing about sex, or what it's for. It's a reproduction system, not a fucking tool. You should only be having sex when you want a kid, not because you two whores "love" each other. "Love" is not an excuse anymore.
π: 0 β©: 3
Dammn, I pressed send too soon. Here:
Sexual intercourse is the biological process of creating a new life. It is not some sick act of βpleasureβ. Pregnancy is a miracle of life and such always be treated as such (though I am not saying rape is acceptable thought this).
Animals only have sexual intercourse for reproduction, so humans should as well. In my opinion, if you have sexual intercourse for pleasure, whether you are married, un-married, heterosexual or homosexual intercourse, you are a dirty, filthy little slut/whore/slag/skank. It shows that you have no control over yourself or your body.
It is disgusting that, nowadays, pregnancy, the whole point of intercourse, is considered a βriskβ of said action and is treating like another STD. It is seen as a BAD thing if a woman is pregnant. Oh yes, because bringing a new life into the world is such a horrible, bad thing. We have lost all respect for it.
In fact, feeling lust, primitive, primal lust, in the first place, in my opinion, makes you a slut, especially the person feeling it is female. While I understand contraception can stop STDs, I am still against them, as I think. βDonβt want STDs? Well, donβt have sex.β
Sexual intercourse for pleasure is what led to the invention of pornography and people becoming prostitutes. That is why it is called sexual reproduction. βSexual intercourseβ is quite a modern term. Nowadays, the miracle of life, what sexual intercourse is designed for, is seen as a βriskβ. If one does not want diseases or pregnancy, then one should not have sexual intercourse. If one does partake in sexual intercourse, and the woman becomes pregnant, they have no right to complain and then proceed to murder the child with an abortion. They should have to live with the consequences of their lust and lack of self-control.
Abortion is selfish. There is no other reason for it than selfishness. Excluding rape, it is the mother and father's fault for being so slutty and perverted as to have lust, and engage in sex for pleasure.
The woman selfishly decides to kill the child (yes, a foetus IS alive, as cells are living things. Even the tiny amebae is a living thing, even without my Roman Catholic beliefs), just so she can escape having to raise her own child.
I LOATHE the term βunwanted pregnancyβ.
I mean, think about it, if no one had sex for pleasure, only for reproduction, there would not really be any need for abortion. The rate of abortion would fall greatly (well, that is my theory anyway).
We should be focusing on how to make pregnancy as painless and non-dangerous as possible, not how to end it before the baby is even born. We should put money towards SAVING lives, not taking them away.
As for me, I am proud that my mind is clean, pure and free of sexual attraction/lust, if anyone is going to call me βasexualβ, as if it were not normal or good, then fuck off. Having no lust/sexual intercourse for pleasure is βnot being a slut/whore/slag/skank. It is being a real, strong woman who does not let a man (if heterosexual intercourse) dominate her and her body.
I am also not abstinent or celibate. I do not choose not to have sex, I naturally do not do not so, as I am not a slut. It is a unnatural choice to put on a condom to have recreational sex.
I only have romantic attraction: love. Love and lust are two different things. Sexual intercourse is not love, it is lust.
I am romantically bisexual, if you get what I mean. I do not when to sleep with either men or women, but I wonder what it would be like to hold someoneβs hand, take a walk with them, go out for a meal for them, or just watch TV with them. Never have I been as low and whorish as to think, βOh, sex with him/her would be great!β or βI wonder what it would be like to sleep with themβ.
I think anything good is better than sexual intercourse. I am most proud to proclaim βIβm eighteen-years-old, and Iβm a virgin! And I shall remain a virgin for many years to come, for I wish to adopt or foster!β I do not care if people think I am crazy. It is what I believe and it has nothing to do with religion. I am saying this as people tend to make assumptions.
To summarise: sexual intercourse is for the production of a new life, not pleasure, and pregnancy is the gift of life and should be treated as such. It is as simple, truthful and understandable as that.
π: 0 β©: 5
I know this comment is old, but psst: Homosexual couples.
π: 0 β©: 0
It is worse to put children in this horrible world.
Don't use the words slut/whore/slag/skank etc. as if you are better than anyone else.
π: 0 β©: 0
Your comment gave me cancer.
π: 0 β©: 0
1. What's with this "pleasure is sick" idea? If we did not feel pleasure from eating or having sex and such, we wouldn't do any of those things, and we would all die off. And by this same 'logic,' we are scumbags with no self-control whenever we eat when we are not hungry, play any sort of game, or do something purely for enjoyment.
2. "Animals only have sexual intercourse for reproduction, so humans should as well."
OH REALLY NOW, HMM? Then I guess all those scientists who study animals were lying when they said they'd discovered that many species of animal including chimpanzees and dolphins (which are some of the most intelligent creatures on the planet mind you) have sex when it isn't mating season. Not to mention all the animals having gay sex, which doesn't produce offspring either. So your argument here is a blatant lie. Moving on.
3. I find it hilarious that you claim you hate sexism, yet you make incredibly sexist remarks.
"In fact, feeling lust, primitive, primal lust, in the first place, in my opinion, makes you a slut, especially the person feeling it is female."
Do I genuinely need to point out what's wrong here? This is a complete double-standard. You still sport the ancient belief that women are meant to be the pure and chaste ones and if she has any sort of unclean thought, she is a whore.
"Having no lust/sexual intercourse for pleasure is βnot being a slut/whore/slag/skank. It is being a real, strong woman who does not let a man (if heterosexual intercourse) dominate her and her body."
I'd also like to mention, not once did you explain why it's so horrible for a woman to have a sex drive. Anyways, the belief that men are the "winners" in sex, and women the "losers" is also incredibly stupid. If both parties consent, no one is being "dominated," simple as that. Fair trade.
4. People don't view pregnancy as a horrible or disgusting thing. They simply recognize that it is an enormous responsibility and they worry that they may be unable to give their baby a decent childhood. It is not some selfish "Oh, if I have a child I won't be able to party anymore" thing.
Lastly, I'd like to mention that after reading your post and then seeing the first quote in your signature... I damn near died of laughter. It was at that point I seriously considered the possibility that you are an enormous troll.
π: 0 β©: 2
Thankyou for correcting what needed to be corrected.
π: 0 β©: 0
Sorry I took so long to reply. I had more inportant things to do.
1. Only sexual pleasure is sick, because unlike other forms of pleasure, it serves no purpose other than have the desire to pointlessly do it again. The only reason this 'pleasure' exists is to make the process of reproduction not entirely unconfortable, especially for the woman.
2. Do not take me for a fool. I know that. The diffrence is, dolphins and chimpanzees have the intelligence to not selfishly stop the natural outcome of sex - a new life - from occuring. Do not take things so litterally.
3. It is not sexist or a Double Standard in the slightest, and here is why - I do not WANT to dislike women doing it more, I cannot help it, due to the way sex naturally works. No strong, real, intelligent women would desire such a thing β a man invading and dominating her. No real woman would want a flithy penis inside her (not that I have anything against men, with most of my friends being male).
Exactly. She is consenting to a man dominating and defiling her body for his own pointless pleasure. He is dominant as he is entering her body and claining it for that digusting pleasure. And you are honestly telling me there is no 'dominant' partner in a sexual realationship? Please, you make me laugh. Women are indeed the 'losers' in heterosexual intercourse for pleasure as they throw aside everything that makes you a good woman.
As for the man, he is disrespecting the male/female target, as he is looking at the them as something to stick his penis into. No intelligent, strong, respectful, dignified, real man would desire that.
4. Even if that were the rare class. that matters not. It is still selfish, it is still her fault, and she has no right to decide there and then whetjher the child will have a good life or not. That is for the child to decide. No one can predicted the future, and no one has any right to govern a life before it has even had a chance to see the light of day.
*Sigh* Can you not take a joke? I found it funny. How does liking a joke make me a troll. In fact, I am sick to death everyone calling any opinion with disagree with the masses a troll. At least we falsly-named 'trolls' are not mindless, brainwashed sheep.
π: 0 β©: 2
Not having sex does not mean that you are more intelligent or better.
Would you force a woman to give birth...?
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh hey there, I almost forgot about this. As much as I disagree with you, there's no point in arguing, neither of us are going to change our opinion on the matter. So with that, have a nice day. :3
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>