HOME | DD
KTWizard — Stop Abusing Sex Stamp
Published: 2010-06-08 14:26:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 5192; Favourites: 185; Downloads: 32
Redirect to original
Description
Rather simple compared to my other stamps, but this one has a message.It was request by my Amorissimê Puella, but this is a message we both agree on. Sex has become the equivalent to daily walks or conversations. People treat it as if it's nothing more than another outlet of for pleasure.
True, but it's so much more than that. It's a union of body and soul between two people, and act that can create new life. Something so sacred that some people (ME!) wait until marriage just to do it!
Seriously, there is a limit.
Related content
Comments: 370
Yknow what'd be horrible?
A currently dating couple have sex,
The next week, the boy dumps her
The girl's life is practically destroyed since she cannot take care of the child herself
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I wish everyone agreed with your mindset.
Too bad it doesnt work that way, the majority of humans dont.
I actually dont either lol, I agree until 18, but not until marriage, by the time people actually decide to get married with someone they're like 30 or 40 and all wrinkily and gross and old and ew. Unless, I mean every human being actually decides to marry by 18 or 20, but OH GOD.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Not everyone agrees with your mindset. People can use sex however they want.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
People talk about it too much. Is that all people think about? There is more to life than sex seriously.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Agreed. There are more important things, like overthrowing the bourgeoisie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It's a union of body and soul between two people, and act that can create new life. Something so sacred that some people (ME!) wait until marriage just to do it!
Im a pro-choice atheist so I don't care about any of that, what els you've got?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This is why I find it rather annoying to the point that people these days, even younger ones are so obsessed about getting laid they completely don't understand the meaning of what true love is anymore rather who's gonna get laid by who? Hell its a gamble a lot when woman end up being pregnant that both the child's parents are just fucking stupid enough to not learn from their mistakes and rather act freely like what they did doesn't matter
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I agree with you. And people shame virgins and talk about "Oh I'm gonna get so much pussy bro" and treat sex like a social status. That is partially why I had a somewhat hatred towards non-asexuals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I just don't feel the need to make a big deal about it. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That's how much I want to love a girl than treat her like a one night stand.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's an instinct-driven biological act that may or may not involve oxytocin. No need to involve unicorns and fairies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You are my new favourite person on the internet!💜
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Unicorns and fairies were not involved to begin with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's kinda hard to know for sure when there's all this "ooo its sooo saycriidddd!!!11!" stuff going on.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Unless a fairy or unicorn has been mentioned in Bible verses in regards to sex with them involved in the act, your statement about fairies and unicorns is a completely unintelligent one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yeah, 'cause if it's in the Bible, that automatically makes it objectively true no matter what, right? Pssst. I'm not a Creationist.
There's also this thing, this system of knowledge about the world, you know, that God also gave humanity. Y'know, that thing called science?
My point is that this "sacredness of sex" you talk about is just an attitude towards it, and there's no data to say that there's any magical (hence me saying "fairies and unicorns") properties about saving your penis/vagina until after a human marriage ceremony save the psychological effects of peoples' attitudes towards it. Sex is sex, inside or outside marriage. It doesn't magically become "clean" or "good" after marriage, nor is it "dirty" or "evil" before marriage.
And yes, there are unicorns in the Bible. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn#…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm not a creationist Neither am I. By automatically assuming I was, you have committed the Straw Man Fallacy. We were not talking about the creation story, anyway.
There's also this thing, this system of knowledge about the world, you know, that God also gave humanity. Y'know, that thing called science? Straw Man number two. I was not denying the usefulness of science, nor was I speaking negatively of it in any way.
My point is that this "sacredness of sex" you talk about is just an attitude towards it, and there's no data to say that there's any magical (hence me saying "fairies and unicorns") properties about saving your penis/vagina until after a human marriage ceremony save the psychological effects of peoples' attitudes towards it. Sex is sex, inside or outside marriage. It doesn't magically become "clean" or "good" after marriage, nor is it "dirty" or "evil" before marriage. Straw Man number three. The term "magical" is not the same as "sacred" or "holy". In fact, "holy" means "set apart". Also, I seem to recall a fallacy called the Appeal to Nature. Applying nature when discussing something of moral importance inevitably falls in on itself. In this case, I can counter your argument based on nature by saying it is also an instinct for a human to think things over, however thoroughly one might do so.
Besides, why would any reasonable person let their lust consume them, knowing the risk of STDs and pregnancy? That is two of the problems worth discussing here.
And yes, there are unicorns in the Bible. Straw Man number four. I did not say, "Unless unicorns are mentioned at all". I challenged you to find a verse about unicorns concerning sex. You are not that great at reading comprehension, are you? How did you pass English class?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Can you please quit nitpicking and just attempt to refute my main point like a normal person, which is "there's nothing intrinsically special about married sex"?
Also, I seem to recall a fallacy called the Appeal to Nature. Applying nature when discussing something of moral importance inevitably falls in on itself. In this case, I can counter your argument based on nature by saying it is also an instinct for a human to think things over, however thoroughly one might do so.
There's no naturalistic fallacy here, because I never said anything was good solely because it's natural. I'm simply stating facts. And the perceived moral importance here is more of a matter of cultural-religious attitude rather than utilitarian reality.
Besides, why would any reasonable person let their lust consume them, knowing the risk of STDs and pregnancy? That is two of the problems worth discussing here.
Who said it had to consume them? Sex is a basic human need; it seems less reasonable to suppress the drive like it doesn't exist. I'm not saying you have to be a prostitute, just that there isn't anything intrinsically wrong about extramarital sex so long as there's an element of responsibility involved.
There are several measures one can use to prevent STDs and unwanted pregnancy, e.g. blood tests and condoms. In the future, humanity will probably have figured out cures for the major diseases, and soon male birth control pills that prevent spermatozoa from receiving their tails will be a reality. Yes, what we have right now doesn't always work 100% of the time. But using that argument to never have extramarital sex is kinda like saying you should never go skiing or skateboarding lest you crash and seriously injure or kill yourself.
I challenged you to find a verse about unicorns concerning sex.
And I declined because it was ultimately irrelevant and gave you that link for fun instead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There isn't anything intrinsically wrong about extramarital sex so long as there's an element of responsibility involved. You've lost me with that statement. Cheating on your spouse is not responsible in the slightest.
Also, the part about giving a link for "fun" is irrelevant. We are not debating for fun. We are debating with a serious tone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You've lost me with that statement. Cheating on your spouse is not responsible in the slightest.
I didn't mean adultery, I don't condone that in any way. I meant "premarital sex", but that word implies everyone gets married. I was using my knowledge of Latin roots and not established definitions, so my bad.
And just who made you the boss of this debate? I can be as light or serious as I damn well please, thank you very much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
the internet is not a place where a person can effectively judge the seriousness or lack of from the person they talk to. In a debate, it is automatically assumed you are being serious because debates are very serious discussions. Maybe you didn't get the memo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The internet? Serious? You've must've been around here for a real long-ass time.
Anyway, are we gonna keep circlejerking or are you gonna tell me what makes married sex sacred?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am not new here (look at my profile and see for yourself). Besides, I came here initially to tell you unicorns and fairies got nothing to do with it. To appease your ego, however, look at this article on how sex is sacred from a neutral standpoint: singledatingdiva.com/2013/03/0…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I came here initially to tell you unicorns and fairies have nothing to do with it.
What are metaphors?
To appease your ego, however, look at this article on how sex is sacred from a neutral standpoint.
That article doesn't prove anything because it doesn't even set out to do so, it's merely a writing prompt for the people in the comments.
Here, take this. jezebel.com/5946349/8-reasons-…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What are metaphors? What is conceitedness?
Here, take this.
First paragraph in, and already I am seeing propaganda, specifically feminist propaganda. It is automatically assuming America does not look down on guys for having premarital sex while doing the opposite with women. If anything, America has been encouraging both genders. Commercials and the media blast us with all that everyday.
Point eight fails to mention that constant sexual activity can be addicting like a drug, the person within that lifestyle being hooked and not satisfied unless he regains that temporary high.
Point seven is nothing more than an Appeal to Nature fallacy, especially since the article is trying to make premarital sex out to be morally right.
Point six is just ridiculous from the start, and not at all professional.
6. Premarital sex leads to more stable marriages.
SPIT TAKE MONOCLE POP OUT RECORD SCRATCH SOUND. Sex, as in having it before you get married, is associated with longer, more stable marriages. Why? Because feminism. SOUND OF A PLATE BREAKING BECAUSE SOMEONE DROPPED IT OUT OF SURPRISE. This just confirms my initial suspicions that this is nothing but feminist propaganda. I'll continue reading, though.
The rest of point 6 is questionable, at best. I have read about couples, such as one about missionary work by Jim Stier and his wife from Against all Odds (true story, by the way), doing just fine without premarital sex. Even my mom and dad are doing well, and they did not have premarital sex.
Point five is just begging for trouble. I will quote from the article I showed you before: "Where it becomes a problem is when people use sex in a non-committal way to get close to other people because they don’t feel fulfilled. The thing is, these casual encounters, instead of fulfilling their need for intimacy, typically make them feel more alone and, in many cases, used."
Point four has nothing to back it up. Refer back to what I said about point six.
Point three appeals to nature, the same fallacy as in point seven.
Point two sounds a lot like the objectification of one gender or another, something that contradicts the article's original assumption that women were seen as dirty. This link will explain it better than I can. www.boundless.org/advice/2012/…
Point one is the lousiest of them all. It basically amounts to, "Most everyone else is doing it, so why not I?" Just because the crowd is doing something does not make it right. This is nothing but an Ad Populum, an Appeal to Popularity fallacy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sex nowadays is lustful it has no passion anymore they want to screw someone senseless and move onto the next person they can find.
To me the old tradition was you wait until after marriage to have sex.
That's why it's so hard to find a good person to stay in a committed relationship w/o them ditching you for another.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
too many sluts out there. that's the problem.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
I feel terrible for saying this but it is true.
Get over yourselves, people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lmaoo 'LIKE' to that comment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Also, why must people be so black and white? either 'omg must fuck everything' or 'must not have sex ever ew'. why not simply having sex with your significant other and be happy? ¬¬ sex is the best thing ever. it's just like children play, except for adults.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Old comment but, I agree with you so much. Exactly. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yaay aheihaue xD
just to be clear, i don't judge people who sleep with a lot of people or people who don't have sex at all, i just see that people often go to these extremes for the wrong reasons, or with the wrong attitude (like thinking they know better or some shit) and then it's harmful to everybody o/
omygosh thank you so much for the watch!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I see. And that's understandable. You're welcome. I really like your style. ;u;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Completely ignoring any religious belief here [i'm not religious at all], i believe how we view sex it's personal, it's a matter of opinion [an opinion we shouldn't judge anyone for]
I'd ague that often one can get emotional existential issues from trivializing sex/being promiscuous. and other issues like becoming shallow, becoming afraid of commitment, seeing people as objects, becoming cold. and the one that should be the worst: appreciating sex a lot less [when you can have it in any corner]
I've never been promiscuous but i bet anything that promiscuity is not a good deal to women [and that alone, to me, would be enough reason not to be. i want my sex mindblowing tyvm]. i found men tend to be selfish in bed even when in a relationship, i don't really believe many men would give a flying shit about pleasuring a one night stand. i don't imagine anyone, for instance, giving oral to woman they just met, and most women cum from that.
I think it's almost an universal notion that sex with feelings for the partner is always better so why not stick to thaaaaaaat
About the affects of how most people view sex on society, i don't even know anymore if it's a result of objectification of people or the cause of it. i think it's a result, or both, LOL, so it's bad either way. Sex being trivialized puts pressure on people, to look like this and act like that, all the time. it makes everyone products, it takes the focus from ourselves to our bodies and that's not good, that's brings body image issues and others.
we all are becoming more and more shallow and promiscuity absolutely adds up to that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Meh, I disagree. Sex to me is just another outlet for pleasure, and not really a big deal considering almost all animals reproduce that way. Not sacred or any dramatic stuff, and no limit to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hmm...could you say the same about drugs?
Alcohol?
All natural ingredients from Earth, yet people can abuse those things all the time.
In truth, everything needs moderation, whether you like it or not.
You can't have too much of everything.
sex can be just as dangerous as those things I have mentioned, it's not just an "outlet for pleasure"
It's rather dangerous and can be a root to many evil things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
you know, while i don't at all agree with the 'sacred' bullshit or any religious view on the matter, i do think the trivialization of sex and objectification of people is not good for society or individual. example: body image issues. self-worth issues - women already are told how they look and sex appeal is all that matters and that's not good for ya, in many ways. plus, lol, not a good deal to women to have one night stands. it takes more than 5 minutes to satisfy a woman let alone make her cum. of course it's a great deal to men. but i bet they eventually appreciate sex less when they can get it in every corner. plus doesn't everybody agree that sex with feelings is better?
so i do agree with you, but while i think we should have no problem admiting loving sex and all, i think promiscuity is not the answer o .o
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Flagged as Spam
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well...yeah xD The fact that someone HAD to make this stamp kinda is depressing. But the fact that someone DID make this stamp kinda brings me a little hope.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Flagged as Spam
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>