HOME | DD
Kyle-Dove β Gen 6 Is in the MMO!
Published: 2013-01-08 23:20:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 50095; Favourites: 707; Downloads: 233
Redirect to original
Description
And once again, Fennekin is the most popular xDIt's really weird playing with new pokemon before the game is out!
Ok this has gotten really popular but I just want to clarify that THIS IS A FANGAME!
These are not screenshots of Pokemon X / Y. It's my own fangame, which is an mmo game (massive multiplayer online). These are screenshots of Route A1 in my fan-made region called Atlas, which has over 200 new pokemon in it. There is no planned release date yet but we're working on it every day and hopefully will release it some time this year.
NOTE: Vermini is not GEN 6! He's in my dex I just wanted to show a battle. He was created by the awesome and full credit goes to him! [link]
Related content
Comments: 455
Hehe, right now they all have tackle anyway~ I heard somewhere their personalities are like, chespin is a knight, fennekin is a maiden and froakie is like a thief haha.
π: 0 β©: 0
With some luck, in gen 6th will be a dolphin PokΓ©mon
I like how PokeMMO works, would be really good if I could play more often. I'm still new on it and unhappily I don't have so much time to play it.
The new ones look really cute as company when walking with you. Personaly, I like how Fennekin looks as a company but my fav one of those 3 is the water froggy ^^
π: 0 β©: 3
A dolphin! Yes! 
Also any water mammal pokΓ©mon would be awesome I really like wailord and lapras I would love to see more whale/narwhal/dolphin/beluga or any kind really!
π: 0 β©: 0
Yes, a dolphin would be nice I'm still waiting for a cheetah Pokemon X3
π: 0 β©: 1
I have a cheetah! hehe
π: 0 β©: 0
Are you on pokengine? Who are you on there?
AND YES They better do a dolphin for god's sakes!
π: 0 β©: 0
Good work, and I apologize on behalf of the entire comments section prior to this one
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks hehe, I appreciate that <3
π: 0 β©: 0
Omg! Teach me to make this PLLLEEASSE!
π: 0 β©: 0
Awesome pictures! *o* (the name of the fakemon looks a little french 
π: 0 β©: 0
YES NOW I CAN RIP THE WINDMILL
π: 0 β©: 1
LOLOLOL U!
Stop it! I dont know what I can do to stop people when the games are out anyway...
π: 0 β©: 0
A Pokemon MMO? Cool, now I can camp a location for a week for a legendary, and when someone else wanders by and grabs it while I'm not looking, another week of camping. XP
π: 0 β©: 1
Haha I have no idea how legendaries are going to work but it wont be like that, I can promise!
π: 0 β©: 0
That Rampardos is going to wreck everyones shit...
π: 0 β©: 1
LOL yup especially in the first route cos everyone is like level 3 lol.
π: 0 β©: 1
"Oh, what's that? Some kind of kindergarden party? Better bring my DINOSAUR!!"
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh I see, and it's not out yet?
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh boy, lotta nostalgia jerks incoming.
Before you guys - and I mean/intend no offense - BAAWWWing about gen six, consider this; Where would Pokemon be if it was to stick with just the first or second gens? Rusted out and forgotten, like countless others.
Loosen those nostalgia goggles just a smidge and accept change to the series. The first gen isn't going anywhere, and you have to have SOME variety instead of just the first hundred and fifty. If there wasn't any, Pokemon wouldn't even exist at this time, instead just be forgotten.
π: 0 β©: 3
I know right... if you love the first 151 then just stick to those games? No one is forcing you to play the new ones. I think it's awesome that each generation there's a new generation of kids growing up on completely different pokemon!
π: 0 β©: 0
I disagree with you there. Not all people criticising the new series are jerks stuck in 2001. I don't care if it's generation 1 or 6, but honestly, I think they're making them way too fast for anyone to enjoy properly and there is just no NEED for all these pokemon. Why make 15 bird pokemon that are just like Pidgey when you can just, I don't know, USE PIDGEY?
Keeping the series alive is ok, but making new pokemon this fast doesn't really allow anyone to get attached to them just like the older kids feel attached to Generations 1 and 2. Can you imagine in ten years today's kids complaining about Generation 16 and saying "Damn, I miss the old Pokemon like Fennekin"? I honestly can't.
π: 0 β©: 1
I disagree with that too. There are some people I don't really like the design of... but I can say that for the original 151 too. What is the point of having birds that are like pidgey? well.... What is the point of the variety of animals we have in real life? We have a variety of different house hold cats, dogs, etc. Why make variation? Why not just adopt a wolf? 
π: 0 β©: 3
We're talking about a game here, not adopting a pet. If a bird pokemon has the same moves as Pidgey, same stats and same usefulness in the battle, then it is essentially a Pidgey, I don't care if it looks different and is called Dipgey or something. Try raising a wolf and a Labrador, see if there's any difference there besides name and looks.
I'm not saying that Generation 1 was flawless or that variation is bad, I meant that having a thousand Pokemon is just too complicated for anyone to remember. The whole fun of Generation 1 was that you actually COULD catch them all. Or et least recognize them all to a reasonable extent.
π: 0 β©: 1
But the game is not a super hardcore game either. It is a fun game where you go out and 'make friends' and 'learn the importance of friendship'. You can twist it however you want and make it as serious as you want, but you have to realize this game, in the end, is designed for pre-teens and young teens. I'm 22. I still play pokemon. But I accept that it is designed for children. Having a ton of pokemon is not complicated either. I have very little problem with it, and I enjoy the 'difficulty' of having to 'catch them all' now. The breeding end of it is geared more towards an older audience - and I love to breed pokemon, so having all these different pokemon with their different egg moves and what not is really neat. The variety is enjoyable.
This is single player game (with some limited multiplayer) that is mostly geared towards young children, with some elements for the older fans - not a competitive online MMO where they stick to only a few classes to make sure everything is as well balanced as possible.
It sounds to me like you are caught up in the details. My 6 year old cousins play the new pokemon games and don't find it 'difficult'. Pokemon is about fun. If you don't find it fun anymore, don't play. But obviously the path they have taken it is successful. I do wish they would make a separate game geared for their older audience (me) - but I don't wish for the entire franchise to go that way.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't quite see your point here. I understand that it is a series for children, and simply switching 'new' pokemon to the 'old' ones wouldn't exactly make it an adult series. From what I understand, you're saying that things like stats, moves and usefulness is not the most important for the kids, ok. But then again, if someone would pick a "newer" Pigdey over an "older" one just because it looks better, then why can't I say I would prefer to play with Charmander over Tepig even though they're more or less the same? (yeah, I know they're not) And yet, newer games do not provide this opportunity.
Also, I do enjoy playing the new games too, which does not mean I don't get to criticise them.
π: 0 β©: 1
Each game takes place in a new area. The wild animals where I live are going to be different from say the animals in Australia. Now, it is true that these places are somewhat close together, and so a huge variance wouldn't be so likely... but welcome to the realm of video games.
My point about wanting a game oriented for the older audience wasn't about the new or old pokemon - it was that we all have our own desires for changes, but it doesn't mean it is going to happen.
You can get old pokemon in the new games through things like trading, safari zones, playing the radio on a certain channel, etc etc. Sure, it is limited, but so what? If you are attached to your old pokemon, trade them to your new game.
Of course you can criticize the game, but make sure your critique has value. You really sound like you are just complaining to complain - because you are mentally stuck in the first couple gens.
π: 0 β©: 1
What would you call a constructive criticism then? I don't hate the new generations, all I'm saying here is that they appear too quickly. It wasn't even two years since Generation 5 came out and I haven't even got used to that one yet. And now, bam, new generation. Designing a Pokemon and introducing it to the canon is not an easy business, therefore, WHY make this many Pokemon if most people end up forgetting them?
Pokemon is such a canonical series by now that even if they'd finally slow down on "discovering" new Pokemon, they'd still be able to produce new great games using areas and characters already existing. Most games follow the exact same pattern (pick a starter, defeat an evil team, get 8 badges, beat the Champion), the only difference being the kind of Pokemon you encounter. Maybe time to change something there?
Anyway, think about Mario or Zelda. They've been using the same characters for over 20 years now and somehow their games are still not dead. I wonder why.
π: 0 β©: 1
Mario and Zelda are very different games. They are not about collections.
Pokemon already experiments with new play styles through their other games like pokemon rancher or whatever it was, and pokemon mystery dungeon, colosseum, hey you Pikachu, snapshot, etc etc. And how do you know pokemon XY will not be so linear?
π: 0 β©: 1
Most of the games you listed have been released in the late 90s. As much as I liked them, they are all spin-off games. And I think it's safe to say X and Y would have a similar pattern, because they already have starters and a new Generation.
I see no point in discussing this further, really. I don't like the fact that they're making a new generation already, because I think it's rushed and unnecessary. I think the approach they're taking trying to refresh the game by making a bunch of new Pokemon is not working - Pokemon is still alive, but it has not been as popular as during the first generation ever again. Maybe I don't like the new generations as much because I'm being "stuck in the past" or maybe it's just because they are really worse. We'll never know, but in the end, why would it matter, really?
π: 0 β©: 1
You... ... Sigh. You really don't understand how these things work.
[link] NOT just from late 1990s. I listed the ones I played when I was little, that is why they are from earlier times - there are many I haven't played that have come out since then. Of course they are spin-offs, I was talking about experimenting with different game types.
They have made a new, main-line game every couple of years, this generation is nothing new at all.
You are very much stuck in the past. I have played every single version. Each version has its ups and downs but over all they are improving. I thoroughly enjoyed Pokemon Black/White 2. They are getting better, not worse.
You have to keep in mind the type of games they are. If they were a PC game or whatever, where they could just release patches and whatnot, it would be very different in how they develop the games.
Anyway. If you don't want to play the new generation, if you feel it is rushed, then there is no reason for you to even consider it. It isn't like they are pushing a new patch or content update on your previous games. You are complaining to complain.
Ciao.
π: 0 β©: 1
And you are determined to make me admit that, because you just can't let go of the fact that someone has a different opinion? Fair enough. I actually started by telling somebody else entirely that it is rather unfair to call those who prefer earlier games "nostalgia jerks", you were the one who pushed into the disscussion. And I am the one who complains to complain?
Seems that no matter what I say, you won't believe that there may be any other possible reason to like any older Pokemon version over a newer one, aside from being a stuck up idiot who likes retro stuff. Which is why I think there's no point in trying to convince you otherwise.
π: 0 β©: 0
Not to mention you could have a bird pokemon like pidgey that especializes in totally different things, like a speedy bird, a high hp bird, a defensive bird, an attacking bird, there is SO much room for variety and that's without going into the designs, which everyone feels so strongly about anyway.
π: 0 β©: 1
Talk about variation. If in Platinum you didn't pick Chimchar as your starter, your only other choice for a fire type was Ponyta. So what is the point of making all these Pokemon if in the end you end up stuck with just a few that you maybe do not like so much?
Keep the new Pokemon coming, just give them some time to sink in and don't kick the old ones out of the games.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah that's true, its not like they make it so you can't use old ones and they aren't in the new games!
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
What the fuck are these ugly weird-ass Pokemon?
π: 0 β©: 1
They are the new pokemon so you better get used to them! (not vermini he's a fake)
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank God Vermini isn't. Looks fucking retarded.
The Pokemon in Black and White were so different from all the others, but they're all alpha as fuck. Big, beasty lookin mother fuckers. Not sure I want a new gen.
Then again, I really don't give a damn.
π: 0 β©: 1
Excuse me but don't call the pokemon in my game ***ing retarded. I dont give a crap what you think of the newer pokemon. If you dont want a new gen then don't play it? It's easy to avoid, I wish I could opt out of talking to people like you as easily!
If you don't give a damn then dont go posting rude comments.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're 24 Bro. Don't take Pokemon so seriously. I didn't say any new gen Pokemons looked fucking retarded. I loved how beasty (as I said) the B and W gen was.
A "rude" comment would've been "Why is the new gen so fucking retarded?" which is what I didn't say.
Grow up, Bro, and read comments over before jumping to conclusions. You butthurt yourself; I merely praised how badass the latest gen was. Not my fault you misread what I wrote.
π: 0 β©: 3
"Thank god that piece of art you worked hard on isn't official, it looks fucking retarded"
Yes that is a perfectly polite and reasonable response and you are not a terrible person. Oh wait a minute I AM INCORRECT
π: 0 β©: 1
Wait, so you're implying I'm a terrible person because I think this worm looks dumb? Seems legit
π: 0 β©: 1
No, I'm outright saying that you're a terrible person, because you were rude to someone about art they worked hard on. Wasn't I obvious enough?
π: 0 β©: 1
He didn't make the worm though. He and I had a man-to-man discussion, and we've come to an understanding, so it's all good now.
π: 0 β©: 1
How nice. You're still a terrible, rude person! Plenty of pokemon are designed to look stupid (Slowpoke, Stunfisk) but "thank god it's not official"? smh
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm a terrible person? Aren't you just equally as terrible for judging me despite not even knowing me? That would be like saying somebody's cooking sucked, because they cooked you stew one day that you didn't like... You don't know if everything else they cook is good or not, you're merely being judgmental because they cooked a single dish you don't approve of.
If the metaphore is too difficult for you to understand, I said something you don't agree with; you got overly-emotional due to this comment made by me, somebody you've never met and know nothing about. You judged my entire being as terrible and "rude".
Shake your head all you want, doesn't make you any less wrong in this situation. Not sure if you know this: Pokemon's a game, people have different personalities and opinions. With those factors, you have to wear your big-boy pants and know everything isn't as it seems (quoting "The Karate Kid"). So if you'd calm down and let your jimmies un-ruffle (as I've somehow ruffled them for you), you'd perhaps think over this situation realistically.
"Plenty of pokemon are designed to look stupid (Slowpoke, Stunfisk) but 'thank god it's not official'?"
Wait... so you think I'm terrible and rude because I said a Pokemon looks stupid?
In case you didn't know, the user who posted this picture didn't create that Pokemon, so no feelings where hurt here besides your apparently, but besides that: if something's bad, it's bad. I could break it more gently, like "Doesn't look too good," or I could be the bastard to give the cold, hard truth.
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>