HOME | DD

Published: 2010-08-18 10:48:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 9218; Favourites: 405; Downloads: 217
Redirect to original
Description
Inherent time is the time an object experiences when traveling close to the speed of light, acording to t=t'*sqrt(1-v²/c²), witch is different to the time a spectator experiences watching the moved object. A moving clock is ticking slower than a local one. (Theory of Relativity)Well somtimes I think I do experience inherent time even if I'm not moving ^^
Model: Sarah
Feel free to comment !
Related content
Comments: 133
L-Netz In reply to ??? [2010-08-23 08:41:20 +0000 UTC]
yup!
Please send me a link of your work when you submit it !
š: 0 ā©: 1
assica In reply to ??? [2010-08-21 20:39:19 +0000 UTC]
wow, the effect is fantastic! brilliant concept
š: 0 ā©: 0
Dreamsthatkillme In reply to ??? [2010-08-20 16:06:08 +0000 UTC]
This is really nice. I love how everythings blurred out and just focused on the girl
š: 0 ā©: 0
str4yk1tt3n In reply to ??? [2010-08-19 13:47:07 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful shot. Really gorgeous.
š: 0 ā©: 1
tudup In reply to ??? [2010-08-19 00:03:18 +0000 UTC]
Nice one! Like the idea of moving...
š: 0 ā©: 0
Niiara00 [2010-08-18 23:22:46 +0000 UTC]
how did you do that effect? I mean, everything is moving, including the environment, but not Sarah. This is an effect I'd like to do, but have no idea about how :s
š: 0 ā©: 1
L-Netz In reply to Niiara00 [2010-08-19 07:01:01 +0000 UTC]
It is a "long time" illumination of 1/10 second. That is enough to make the walking person becoming 'blurry' and short enough so that the model can stand still. To increase the effect I used some kind of motion Blur on the entire image, but Sarah.
š: 0 ā©: 1
hello-123456 In reply to L-Netz [2010-09-04 18:24:29 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for explaining, was wondering the same thing
š: 0 ā©: 1
hello-123456 In reply to L-Netz [2010-09-04 20:28:00 +0000 UTC]
Coincidence: You answer something with '-time' in it, just when I'm uploading a wallpaper with a watch on it. xD
š: 0 ā©: 1
L-Netz In reply to hello-123456 [2010-09-04 20:52:45 +0000 UTC]
There no coincidences are !
Nice shot btw!
š: 0 ā©: 1
CrestofHealing In reply to ??? [2010-08-18 14:37:37 +0000 UTC]
I love this idea, and can definitely relate to it. Great shot!
š: 0 ā©: 1
Mister-0 In reply to ??? [2010-08-18 12:49:32 +0000 UTC]
The picture is a little dark but I like the idea
š: 0 ā©: 1
L-Netz In reply to Mister-0 [2010-08-18 13:23:24 +0000 UTC]
Just wrote 4 exams in physics, I think it has a bad influence on the way I name my pictures
š: 0 ā©: 1
Mister-0 In reply to L-Netz [2010-08-18 13:40:31 +0000 UTC]
You got to slow down a little with physics lol... But thanks to you i'm "smarter" now
š: 0 ā©: 0
<= Prev |